The Evil Penis

Manginas and White Knights are Everywhere

2011-11-25T12:58:00.000Z

I might have thought before leaving the femosphere (aka the anglosphere) that other men who follow the same path as me might have similar ideas and/or experiences. No such luck I'm afraid. It seems that every western man I meet out here constantly complains about how women are so badly treated and that they have no rights blah blah blah. At least in England the men I have spoken to about the issues I talk about here are open to discussion. It would seem that the guys over here are either so convinced by feminism and its lies or that they see an opportunity to be some kind of 'ultra white knight'... they think that if they be overly chivalrous that their chances of getting laid will increase. They implore the local women to get their asses over to the west so they 'can be treated right' and 'get a fair deal'.

L
M
F
A
O

I have several problems with this. Firstly, these stupid tactics work no better over here than they do in the west. I would say that they are even more useless. The local men here are strong, the vast majority of them have served their country in the military. The mangina brigade seem to forget the fact that national service here is only for men. The women here are accustomed to having someone masculine, not a pathetic pussy-begging mangina. I, being me, find no difficulty challenging these types. Even in front of a large group of people it is much easier to make them look foolish here, and I often do. The women here respect men and what they must do. I said before and I'll continue to say it...

It is men's responsibility to protect women. Ask the men on the titanic. Ask any man who has done national service or been conscripted.

Fortunately, I have yet to meet a Turkish man who shares these feminazi views. Anytime I have confronted a white knight about the problems in the west owing to feminism I have been wholeheartedly supported by the men AND women who are present.

Life for me couldn't be better. I'm surrounded by beautiful young women every day. I have a cute 19 year old girlfriend who comes to my house and cooks for me, cleans my flat, gives me massages, pleases me sexually and generally does anything reasonable that I ask of her. She respects the fact that if somebody tries to attack her or enter the house that it is me who must risk my life for her... and the nice things she does for me are in gratitude of this fact.

Keep your western sluts who expect you to do all of these things and more as a matter of course and give you nothing but abuse in return.

Remember this... you have to risk your life to save that of the woman in your company. Why do that for some ungrateful spoilt bitch when you can very easily come to a place like this and actually get the respect you deserve for it?

Never Coming Back

2011-10-31T13:20:00.000Z

I´ve been here in Istanbul for a few weeks now and have come to the somewhat inevitable conclusion that the deal men get here is much better. So much better in fact that I almost wish I had been born here, but I guess that if that was the case then I wouldn't appreciate it as much.

You idiot feminists think that the west is a patriarchy? This, my deluded ones, is a patriarchy... and the social cohesion here is plain to see. Conclusive evidence, in my humble opinion, that a patriarchal system is the only one that works. People dont get divorced here (or very rarely, it is shameful for the whole extended family). Young men grow up with discipline from their fathers that their mothers cannot provide. I´m 6´3... I was this height when I was 15 years old. Do you really think that my mother had any ability to control me? I can hear the feminists now saying 'you don' respect your mother blah blah', you must remember that a 15 year old BOY is not morally or politically conscious so to speak... he is a child that is overrun by hormones telling him to compete and to be strong. I was fortunate enough to have my father around when I was that age. And guess what, I was afraid of him. Had I not been, like most of my friends at school weren't (because he wasn't there for whatever reason) then I think it is quite likely that I could have gone off the rails and ended up a drug addict or career criminal like many of my schoolfriends.

It has been very interesting to hear the opinions of the Turkish men... It is quite ironic that they mostly mirror my own vıews on family. Here, the most important member of a family is the father. He is shown the upmost respect because he is the one who is expected to risk his life for the benefit of his family. Do you not find it strange that in the west the father is still expected to fulfill this role but gets absolutely no kudos for it. In the west the father is seen as a cash machine and/or abuser of his so-called (non-existant) power and privelege. Here he is the brick and the woman is the mortar... 'Socially constructed' gender roles are the norm.

I am still a young man, and I was under the impression that I might never be able to have a family of my own and be happy. Well here in Turkey I know I can. My children will listen to me. I can't be evicted from my own house because my wife decides she feels sad this week. I can discipline my family without fear of being labelled an abuser. I can expect my wife to act like a woman and fulfill her responsibilities properly.

The women here are so much better than western women it is almost laughable. One of the things I didn't really expect to notice is that very very few women here are overweight. In England I would say that around half of the women between 18 and 40 are overweıght, if not completely obese. Here, I would estimate that around 1% of the women in the same age bracket are even slightly overweight. If you were to come here it would be preferable that you like brunettes though lol. Here is a good example of a typical Turkish woman:

If you are a man who is dısgusted with the treatment of men in the west and can't see yourself playing the feminist game then get your ass out here pronto. Perhaps you are a MGTOW advocate, perhaps you want our own family and don't wish to be a slave to your 'wife'... Either way I suspect you would be far happier here... Or anywhere else in the muslim world to be honest.

Obviously I still have lots to learn about the culture here but one thing is for certain, there is absolutely no way on Earth you will ever catch me living back in England.

Well, Here I Am

2011-10-18T19:35:00.000+01:00

Greetings!

I was in two minds about whether to tell people where I was going but have decided that it wouldn´t be anywhere near as valuable to people that follow this blog and are interested in my new adventure if they didn´t know. So here goes...

I was offered a job in Istanbul, Turkey. Seeing as I didn´t have a job I thought ´why not?`. I already knew a lot of people here and knew quite a lot about the culture so it wasnt a difficult decision to come here.

I still did a little research before I came and found out some interesting things... for example (and correct me if you can fınd out otherwıse but I believe the dıvorce rate here is around 5%. Not 50% like in the west. Im not great at maths as Ive said before but by my reckonıng that means that if you get married here you are ten times less likely to get divorced. I looked for some information about dating here and found this from escapeartist.com:

Turkey
If you're a woman who hasn't turned a head in a while, get yourself to Turkey. Turks are blind with lust over Western women regardless of their weight, advanced age, complexion, whatever your perceived faults back in America, Turks will make you feel beautiful.
They also see no conflict with having several girlfriends AND a wife, a holdover from the days of the harem, when you could tell a man's wealth by how many wives he had. The word monogamy does not exist in Turkish male circles, and the women just “don’t ask”. On the other hand, there are few divorces, as the wife tends to remain the “primary” for life.
If you are a western male, cross Turkey off of your list, at least for the near future. Turkish women do not go out with Western men.

I know what you are thinking, the first part about men sounds great but the last sentence not so good. Fortunately I can inform you that I highly doubt whoever wrote this has ever been to Turkey. English is a very important language for people here (so if you are a natıve speaker you have a distinct advantage over other the locals when it comes to attracting the Turk women) and they absolutely love anyone with blue eyes, which I have. It is true that the Turkish men go mad for western women, sımply because they think that they are easy, which lets face it they are. The game is different here, you cant really go to a pub/bar and pick up a girl to fuck her that night, but if you think that it is impossible to get them ınto bed then I dare say that you are doıng something wrong (I had already slept wıth nıgh on a dozen Turkish women before I came here).

There were certain things that I knew about this country before I came. Not all of them are positive from a male perspective. For example...

I was aware that men here are forced to do national service (2 years if you dont go to university and 3 months if you do go), which women are excluded from.

Women are expected to do all of any domestic duties such as cleaning and cooking. I find it quite ironic that if you look at any informatıon regarding womens rights here then you might be led to belıve that this is some kind of barbaric patriarchaş society where women are treated like shit... they always leave out the fact that it is only men that are forced into the military. Strange that.

The women here really are stunningly beautiful. Do a google search for Turkish women and you will see for yourself....

More to come.

I'm Off

2011-10-09T11:14:00.000+01:00

I've been majorly busy lately getting my life sorted. You may or may not be pleased to discover that now I'm saying bye bye and a massive fuck you to England, the anglosphere and the rest of the feminized world.

Good bye.

Fuck you.

No, I've not become suicidal. I've noticed many MRAs get comments asking them 'why don't you go to live in a muslim country if you hate feminism so much?'

Well, that's exactly what I'm doing.

Sexual Offenses and Children

2011-09-29T19:17:00.000+01:00

By Dulantha

Why parents love their children? All of children have born as a result of natural sexuality. That is why parents really love their children. If all the children have born without a sexual intercourse between parents, there will not be a real love between parents and their children too. The sexual pleasure which is generating between two parents is strongly attached with the love which is generating between parents and their children.

If parents really love their children they must build up their children’s sexuality in a successful healthy way which is natural from the younger ages. Then they will be able to set up the society and also they will be able to create their next generation. Masculinity is a paternal inheritance and it determines the male sexuality as well. On the other hand femininity is a maternal inheritance and it determines the female sexuality as well. That is how parents of a person become the most responsible people for determining that particular person’s sex drive. Shaping the gender rolls of children with correct specifications is the main factor of this. Real fathers must rise up their sons in a masculine way and they must let mothers to rise up their daughters in a feminine way too. Keep in mind; children will become adults in future. Parents with social responsibilities must teach their children to accept the natural sexuality from the younger ages. They must teach their children what there must be an acceptable sexual life style which is natural in the society too. Then they will realize that they must spend their lives according to those particular conditions.

We must protect children from sexually abusing. That is for protecting their sexual life in future and that is not for joy of people who are trying to deform the natural sexuality. It is wrong if a grown man sexually abused an underage girl, when that particular girl is following a real feminine way of life according to the society and if she is accepting the natural sexual life style. But if children are being sexually abusing by homosexuals, that is too dangerous. If we considered an incident of a man sexually abusing an underage girl and, if we considered another incident of a gay man is sexually abusing an underage boy or a lesbian is abusing an underage girl, these incidents are not similar. First one is wrong just because of it is causing to collapse the acceptable sexual lifestyle of the society. But the second incident is wrong, not just because of causing to collapse the sexual lifestyle; it is not the natural way of sex and it is abnormal. So that is why it is too dangerous. We must protect the children from sexually abusing them by adults while we are protecting the natural sexuality and the acceptable sexual lifestyle.

Show Men Some Respect

2011-09-20T11:24:00.000+01:00

Feminists often harp on about how men should respect women. They deserve it, we hear. Well newsflash hunnies, men have always respected women. Look up chivalry, idiot.

What about respecting men? We never hear anything about that.

Is it not men who sacrificed their lives during two world wars to maintain the western way of life?

Is it not men who have always broken their backs to pay for their families?

Is it not men who were expected to give their lives so that their families may live?

Is it not men who stood as women entered a room?

Is it not men who offered their chairs to women?

Is it not men who opened doors for women?

Is it not men who refrained from foul language in the presence of women?

Is it not men who have created the world we live in?

Is it not men who created justice?

Is it not men who created medicine?

Is it not men who created music, art, literature, the internet, television?

Is it not men who protect and provide for women and children, and who have always done?

Is it not men who created welfare, and continue to contribute most to it?

Is it, or isn't it?

Well?

Rather than make this a male versus female question, as in 'who deserves respect more?', I'll make it very simple for you...

Do men DESERVE respect or not?

Thank you.

Feminists are HOT!!!

2011-09-05T12:19:00.000+01:00

Reading MRA literature can become quite depressing so here is a video that might just make you smile.

I wet myself!

What is an MRA?

2011-09-01T11:18:00.005+01:00

Hopefully, if you typed this question into google you have found this page somewhere near the top.

There are many conflicting ideas as to what an MRA is.

Men's Rights Activist, Men's Rights Advocate.

It doesn't really matter what the letters actually stand for, the basic gist is the same. An MRA is someone that recognizes men's issues, and wants to do something about them.

If you read something really negative about MRAs then in all likelihood you have stumbled across a rabid man-hating feminist (although you can find some negativity within the manosphere) such as this one.

In her/its FAQ section you will find this charming attempt to describe us horrible people, comments in parentheses are mine:

Q: What’s an “MRA”?A: Massively [W]rong Asshole. Or ‘men’s rights activist’.
Q: Why don’t (doesn't) the Odd Lady want none (any) of them in her car?A: MRAs are patriarchy-deniers. The ideologies of this violent (unsubstantiated rubbish) and knobbish subset of the Male Dominion spring from male fear of women’s personal sovereignty, and manifest in practice as active misogyny. Men suffer, O how they suffer, at the hands of subhuman conniving bitches who seek world domination through insane women-are-human (men are evil) propaganda and the misguided attempt to claim their own internal organs as private property (WTF?). The MRA imagines that women’s interests control and abuse him in an ever more feminized world; he erroneously sees himself as a battered victim of women’s agency , rather than what he actually is: a moron.
The goals of the men’s rights “movement” include, but are not limited to:
• supporting legislation that would give men an edge in child custody battles.

(It would have to be some pretty extreme legislation to 'give men an edge'. As far as I can tell, MRAs tend to ask for equality in family courts. How dare they?)

• the right to hijack another human being’s personal uterus if the MRA suspects his sacred genetic material is involved in an embryo contained therein.

(Where she writes 'sacred genetic material', I think (but am not sure) that she means child or children. I told you she was charming. Read: men want something to do with their own children. How very dare they?)

• promulgating baseless claims that men are in constant danger of physical assault by legions of villainous females, and that there exists some kind of vast matriarchal conspiracy to cover this up.

(Well, men are in just as much danger of assault by women as vice-versa. Who needs a conspiracy to cover up anything when the feminazi gang just keep shouting about how violent men are? It's not a cover-up, it's a drown-out.)

• the practice of beating up women, kidnapping her kids, going on the lam, convincing family court judges that the woman is crazy, and summarily escaping jail time.

(It's amazing but this is exactly what feminists are fighting for on behalf of women. I dare you to find a single MRA who advocates beating up women or not holding men accountable for their crimes. All feminists do this for women)

Anyone who cries “what about the men?” in a radical feminist forum is, whether he likes it or not, an MRA sympathizer.

So there you have it...

Defend men and you are a 'moron', apparently.

It might be worth noting that this woman is a self proclaimed spinster who looks like this:

Larf...

Credit to stoner with a boner for finding this idiot.

Another Evil Child Abuser, Sex Liar

2011-08-31T18:09:00.000+01:00

Here is her face, be careful if you live in Ireland.

Why is she not in prison?

Read the full story here: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2011/08/23/racehorse-trainer-vicky-haigh-coached-her-daughter-to-falsely-claim-her-dad-was-a-paedophile-high-court-rules-115875-23365076/

Excerpt:

A GIRL of seven at the centre of a custody battle was coached by her mum to make fake claims that her father was a paedophile.
Former jockey Victoria Haigh, 41, also launched a public campaign against her wholly innocent ex-partner David Tune, a senior High Court judge said yesterday.
After a series of private hearings, Sir Nicholas Wall decided to make his judgment public yesterday because “scandalous allegations” were put in the public domain “via email and the internet”.

Rape Liars, Sex Offenders

2011-08-31T15:57:00.000+01:00

How can anyone say that a false rape allegation is not a sexual offense, and shouldn't be treated as such?

Men who are convicted of sexual offenses are placed on a register to protect possible future victims. I would agree that a man who is, as anyone must be to commit rape or feel attracted to pre-pubescent children, a pathological criminal should be monitored in this way.

The same applies to rape liars. To make such an accusation a person must be, as with rape, criminally insane. How could someone have such little remorse to do such a thing?

It isn't as if women who lie about rape don't do it repeatedly...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1280926/Student-cleared-rape-emerges-second-man-committed-suicide-falsely-accused-woman.html

http://www.mgtowforums.com/forums/red-pill-blue-pill/4126-bbc-personality-made-40-false-rape-allegations-against-her-ex-boyfriend.html?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed

Unfortunately there isn't a precedent for registering female sex-offenders...

Or is there?

If you don't know about it yet there is a website called register-her.com, where you can make sure that nobody else suffers at the hands of these sex-pest perverts.

Been abused? Go check it out!

Risk and Reward: The Great Sexual Misconception

2011-08-24T12:06:00.001+01:00

It has long been accepted that the risks of having sex fall disproportionately on women. It seems obvious that the answer is yes, but is it really that obvious? Is it even true? I would argue that sex, in the modern world, is far more dangerous for men. Or, at the very least, it isn't as clear cut as one may assume. This may be counter-intuitive, but bare with me...

It is not surprising that feminists may make the claim that sex holds greater consequence for women, they do after all claim that women have it worse in any and all situations - regardless of the evidence. I dare you to try telling a feminist that sex is more dangerous for men, without armour and a shield, lol. As you will know if you have been reading this blog for any amount of time, or any of the sites on the right sidebar; our chivalrous, misandric media tends to go along with the feminist opinion. But even within the manosphere you will find this notion. You might read some pseudo-scientific-evolutionary-theory PUA advice that tells you this is why women 'test' men and why they are more picky.

Let us look at the relative risk factors to get a better understanding...

Risks for women:

Pregnancy.
STDs.
Tarnished reputation eg. slut-shaming.
Being 'used' for sex.
Rape.

For all of these there are safeguards in place that render them seriously less significant. There are many forms of contraception for women (including abortion, a woman only ever has a child in the west if she chooses to), being a slut is now ok, rape is punishable by life in prison. If a woman feels used or manipulated she need only tell the police that she has been abused/raped and she will receive a significant financial compensatory package, while destroying the man's life.

Rewards for women:

Motherhood.
Guaranteed public housing.
Guaranteed income.
Excuse to never get a job.
The bragging rights of having 'the hardest job in the world'.
State sponsored power over the father.
Improved social status.
Sexual satisfaction.
Security.

Millions of women take advantage of these benefits. If I were a woman, and being honest, I probably would too.

Risks for men:

'Fatherhood'
Financial slavery.
STDs.
False rape allegations.
Unwitting paedophilia.
Assault by female's partner.
Social stigma (sexual predator, player, user).
Paternity fraud.

Fatherhood is in inverted commas because it doesn't exist in the west anymore, unless the woman allows it to.

Rewards for men:

'Fatherhood'.
Sexual satisfaction.
Bragging rights.

I think the lack of balance is clearer now.

We all, if we think about it logically, know the risks involved in sex. It seems obvious looking at the evidence that anyone should refrain from having sex, or even being in an environment where sex is possible (i.e. being alone or spending the night together) until they are sure about:

1. The sexual history and health of their new sexual partner.
2. The trustworthiness of their new sexual partner.
3. The age of their new sexual partner.
4. The relationship status of their new sexual partner.

So why are men more inclined to dismiss the dangers and try to have sex at all costs? If you think they aren't then just look at the number of dating and PUA sites there are and how much they charge. Men will pay through the nose to have sex. Remind me, what is the oldest profession in the world?

There are many, many resources for women telling them about how dangerous sex can be for them. The mainstream media also tells them that they should be chaste at every given opportunity.
'Don't put out'
'make him work for it'
'you are worth more than that'
etc.
Women are constantly bombarded with messages telling them to be careful about sex.

Men, on the other hand, are given no such information. On the contrary, men are constantly bombarded with information telling them that they must have sex, shamed if they don't. Not only this, but the strong male sex drive is constantly being abused and exploited for financial gain. Watch television for one hour and tell me that there wasn't some allusion to sex designed to excite men.

I would recommend that before you have sex, as a man, read The Evil Penis' Guide to Safe Sex

Kellet, again...

2011-08-21T09:08:00.000+01:00

Evil misandrist Mary Kellet has been at it again.

As I reported on recently, Mary Kellett, the Ellsworth, Maine prosecutor notorious for pursuing flimsy cases, always against men accused of sexual or domestic assaults, has put her foot in it again. Only this time it appears that her misstep has put her ankle deep in a bear trap.
A recap of the most recent case goes as follows. Keovilaisack Sayasane, 44, was charged with threatening to harm his wife with a hammer in their home. A problem for the prosecution in the case was that Sayasane’s wife was scheduled to testify for the defense. As the only eyewitness and alleged victim in the case it could have proven to be an insurmountable obstacle to a conviction.
But the wife had a change of heart about testifying when she was told by Mary Kellett that Sayasane had been convicted of killing his first wife some 25 years earlier. The Bangor Daily News reports that when the judge in the case, Justice Kevin Cuddy, learned of this, he ultimately declared a mistrial, which ended the current proceedings against Sayasane, but allows the prosecution to retry the case.
Sayasane, however, had not killed his first wife. He was convicted of manslaughter in the 1987 stabbing death of a man in Hampden, Maine.
Court transcripts reveal that both defense attorney Jeffry Toothaker and Mary Kellett informed the court that they were both given the erroneous information on Saysane’s conviction by Deputy Attorney General William Stokes, head of the Attorney General’s Office’s criminal division. But Stokes has a strikingly different story. Namely that it never happened.

This is Stoke’s version according to the Bangor Daily News:
“Stokes said he never provided any information to Kellett that indicated that the victim in the manslaughter case was Sayasane’s previous wife, or even that the victim was a woman. Stokes said he had no prior knowledge of the case before Kellett contacted him about it, and so had to go look up the information in case summaries that are kept on file at the Attorney General’s Office in Augusta.
The summary, Stokes said, indicates that the victim in the 1986 stabbing was a 21-year old man named Boudone Meuaneboutdy who was a friend of Sayasane’s. He said that is the information he forwarded to Kellett.
“Where the wife part came in, I have no knowledge,” Stokes said.

Now, assuming that Stokes is not lying, Mary Kellett has just been dropped into the fryer. On the merits of his statement alone, two factors become abundantly clear.

Mary Kellett engaged in witness tampering by lying to the alleged victim in the case thus coercing her to withdraw exculpatory testimony.

Mary Kellett further perpetrated a fraud on the court by misleading the judge to believe that she had been furnished information from the state AG’s office, when in fact she had been furnished no such information.

There may well be other violations that become apparent as this case is investigated further. But these two points of interest do serve as grounds for further complaints to the Overseers of the Bar in Maine, as well as to the office of Governor Paul LePage and the Office of the State Attorney General.
There is a pending bar complaint on Mary Kellett stemming from the Vladek Filler case that was filed by the National Coalition for Men. That complaint has been investigated and referred to the bar with the recommendation that sanctions against Kellett were warranted.
It was originally the position of AVfM that before a complaint was filed with the bar against Kellett for the Sayasane case that the Filler complaint would be allowed to come to conclusion. These recent revelations by the state AG of Maine are grounds to revise that decision.

The time for action is now.

On behalf of the people of the United States and in the interest of justice, AVfM will now proceed with a bar complaint against Mary Kellett for the willful fraud of a court of law and for witness tampering in a criminal proceeding. We will also be sending letters of protest and pleas for justice to Governor LePage and to the Attorney General of Maine.
I am also going to call on readers of AVfM to assist with these vital actions as quickly as possible. Please write Governor LePage and the State Attorney General and ask them why, after such demonstrated malfeasance on the part of a Maine state functionary, is she being allowed to continue prosecuting in Maine.
I am also writing Ellsworth District Attorney Carletta Bossano, Mary Kellett’s direct supervisor and the individual that holds the ultimate responsibility for actions that emanate from her office, to demand that Kellett be suspended from duties until her actions are thoroughly investigated. I ask all those interested in justice to do the same.
Finally, if you have a blog or website, no matter how large or small, I ask you to please help us go on the offensive against the Orwellian nightmare happening in Maine by posting this article, in its entirety to your site. Facebook and twitter users, please do the same, and thank you all for helping us turn up the heat on an ongoing miscarriage of justice.
Remember, if we can just take one corrupt prosecutor out it will send reverberations throughout the system of feminist governance and will correct an absolute evil going in the state of Maine. Even the Bangor Daily News, previously hesitant to fully address this story, is now smelling blood. Let’s finish this. Let’s FTSU, and I mean NOW.
Contact Maine’s State Attorney General
Contact Governor Paul LePage
Contact District Attorney Carletta Bossano

Urban Dictionary: Misandry... WTF?

2011-08-17T12:40:00.000+01:00

I don't know how I missed this until now but, have you seen the number one definition for misandry in the urban dictionary? A charming racist misandrist apparently named 'bigdaddyknowseverything' writes:

A term created by a group of straight white men who habitually confuse their "brain" with their anus. These men's rumination are usually too moronic for anyone without brain damage. They use this word to refer to what they perceive as "hatred of men" by the government, the media, and society at large.

Firstly, let's take the race issue out of it right now. Misandry has nothing to do with being black, white pink or yellow... It is about the hatred of men you imbecile.

What these white men conveniently ignore is the fact that the government, the media, society, and any system of representation is run by white men for white men and used to marginalize women and minorities.

WRONG! These things are run by (mostly) white men FOR PROFIT, you utter idiot. Women and minorities are given special privileges. It might be worth mentioning also that 'white men' invented the government, society and any system of representation.

These white men keep on complaining about "misandry" despite the fact that:
- according to the most extensive studies by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (2003), US Department of Labour, International Labour Organisation, the United Nations, the World Bank, the European Commission, the UK Equalities Office (2010), the OECD, and various sovereign governments, universities and NGOs, women earn significantly less than men EVEN WHEN ADJUSTED for differences in work experience, education, occupation, parental and marital status, hours worked, tenure, etc.;

You cannot be hated because you earn more! How ridiculous! So what if men are higher achievers, they always have been and they always will be, this has absolutely zero relevance to whether people hate them or not. In fact, it is a reason why 'white men' are hated.

- women are the primary targets of gender violence and men are the primary perpetrators of gender violence (e.g., U.S. Bureau of Statistics 1999, 2004), CDC (2000) WHO, UN, tribunal statistics worldwide, etc;

Nonsense, bogus feminist statistics. Everyone now knows that women are just as violent as men, as is shown by study after study after study. Even if that weren't the case, your stupid retort doesn't do anything at all to show that the hatred of men isn't real. So some men hit women, does that mean that people don't hate men? Well, no, it doesn't. It is completely irrelevant.

- men dominate all spheres of power from the military, government, economic, social (slut shaming, dual burdens, attacks on women's capabilities and other sexist gender roles, etc), religious and reproductive rights (in most countries and states of the world).

Again, one of the reasons for misandry. And again, does nothing to show that misandry isn't real.

- white men have a disproportionately large share of power although women outperform men in school and college in all OECD countries (e.g., PISA 2001);
- white men disproportionately control all systems of representation (religions, movies, songs etc.) and constantly depict the world and women and minorities from their point of view.
- 99% of the definitions of gender sensitive subjects on this site are something violent towards and degrading of women and women's bodies.

What does this have to do with misandry? I'm beginning to think that you are just jealous.

How about you take it easy straight white men? Your white, male and heterosexual privilege isn't going anywhere, so RELAX.
"Misandry"?! LOL.

It is not a privilege to be a white man. Because of all of these things you mention it is actually a burden...

Numbskulls like you think that because some powerful people have the same colour skin as me and happen to have a penis, that I'm (and anyone unfortunate enough to be like me) invulnerable to hatred, that oppression isn't as bad for me. This attitude IS MISANDRY. And people are waking up to it. Enjoy your ability to denigrate men (and apparently whites), because it won't last much longer.

It is rather ironic that a piece of garbage like this pertaining to explain why misandry doesn't exist is a perfect example of misandry itself.

Who is Responsible?

2011-08-16T14:58:00.000+01:00

A man and his wife take a leisurely stroll along the cliffs. The woman, for whatever reason, falls off the cliff and to her rocky demise A total accident, you think.

BUT NO!

The police would like to know what happened to her. The poor guy, still reeling from the shock of watching his pride and joy splattered across the rocks below, and with the seagulls still frenziedly feasting on her fresh remains, now must face ‘questioning’ to ascertain if he is a ‘suspect’. ‘Why did you let her fall?’ What if the police had ever been called to a ‘domestic incident’ (i.e: argument) between the two... that would give him a ‘motive’, identify him as ‘violent’ and an ‘abuser of women’. Now all we need are some ‘signs of a struggle’ and the poor widower now faces life in prison. Because his wife insisted on wearing pumps instead of hiking boots, as they clash with whatever overpriced animal remains she might be wearing, our friend the responsible adult failed in his obligation to protect the woman in his care. So he must pay the price of his negligence.

Let’s say that the same couple go along the same cliff, and the woman, for whatever reason, decides to push the man over the edge. Let’s say that the police had again been called to an earlier altercation between the two. Let’s say even that they had had sex before coming on their petit sejour.

All the woman need do is claim that she was a victim of domestic violence, and that her boyfriend had raped her, and guess what?!

Not guilty! Your murderous ways are excused, you poor little victim.

So, to answer the question in the title of this text...

You are! If you are a man that is. You are 100% accountable for any and all actions that you (or she) chooses to do. Being drunk is no excuse. Being ignorant is no excuse. In fact, if you are a man, THERE ARE NO EXCUSES AT ALL, ever, for anything. Most men (i.e: adults) are rightly unconcerned with this. It is, after all, your life and you are free to make most decisions. If you make a bad choice it seems logical that you may receive some form of negative consequence for your bad judgement. Such is life!

The opposite is true for women. It seems anything a woman does is somehow NOT her fault. They are not held to anywhere near the same level of accountability as men. Ergo, being an accountable man, you are responsible not just for yourself, but for any women in your life too... legally, morally and financially.

But how can I be responsible for another?’ I hear you ask. Well, my friends, you better believe that you are. You are responsible for the well being, physical, mental or otherwise, of any woman you choose to spend time with...

Privileged Feminists and the Victim Mindset

2011-08-16T02:17:00.002+01:00

Some people just don't get it. They get so wrapped up their own super-entitled world-view that they can't see the wood for the privilege trees.

A link was put up to this blog from a "queer single mother" who also purports to be a militant feminist, and from her comment aimed at me you must wonder if she can even read:

because nothing inspires faith in your concept that sex equality already exists like your reinforcement of rape culture, and the idea that us little ladies just need a good deep dicking to set us straight)

I'm actually really chuffed that she typed misandry into google and got me lolz. Where exactly have I stated that gender equality exists, darling? And how exactly am I reinforcing your mythical 'rape culture'? Where did I mention fucking sense into 'little ladies', and not (rabid man-hating) feminists? (you DO realize that feminists and women are not synonymous, don't you?)

I’ll issue a challenge: Share with me a demonstration of misandry, and I will explain how it is actually a demonstration of misogyny.

Challenge accepted :)

After being falsely accused of rape by my ex-wife, I was sent to prison despite the fact that the police and prosecutors knew:

   That we had had sex since she made the allegation
·        That she had tried to destroy my evidence, but that I still had recordings that would prove my innocence
·        That she had been calling me constantly for months (we obtained her phone records, which showed her calling me 125 times, after the allegation!)
·        That going to prison would destroy my life, and stigmatize both me and my whole family
·        That her story was littered with inconsistencies and outright lies
·        That she stood to gain citizenship by making an allegation of abuse
·        That she had contacted my ex and specifically asked her to say bad things about me
·        That the only evidence they had was the rebutted word of a single person
On top of all of these seemingly obvious indicators of my innocence, the police:·        Lied during the interview
·        Hid evidence from my legal team
·        Refused to investigate my story
·        Completely ignored all the evidence that I had
·        Lied at the bail hearing ( they insisted they had evidence that I had been calling my wife, which they obviously didn’t)
When the case finally got to court, it was dropped like a hot iron. Yet that didn’t stop the good old government:·        Compensating my wife to the tune of £12,000
·        Giving her a council flat
·        Paying her incapacity benefit to the tune of £300 per week for over a year
·        Giving her a free place in university
·        Granting her citizenship
Why? How could this happen to such an obviously innocent man? How could the law be so skewed that this could happen? I asked the officer in case after… and you know what he said? And I quote:“The police are heavily criticized when it comes to the rape cases. Women’s groups insist that the maximum number of alleged rapists are prosecuted, our hands are tied”

How is the destruction of my life in the name of feminism an example of misogyny, and not misandry?

Also, to be honest, your own choices of examples of misandry and attempted rebuttals weren't exactly convincing. They did more to show just how prevalent misandry is, when you can find such misinformation so freely.

Very few people hate women, you are confusing the hatred of women with the love of women.

Of course women get less harsh sentences, almost always get custody, get far more healthcare benefits, get many legal privileges, get affirmative action... because EVERYONE hates them! lol! It goes to show how twisted some people can be that they count a privilege as an example of hatred.

Chivalry = hatred

Protection and provision = oppression

Lorena Bobbit?

Mary Kellett?

Valerie Solanas?

All fervent misogynists, eh?

You can abuse, attack and even kill men with impunity. You can rape a man and force him to pay for your child while never allowing him to see it. You can use the police to destroy a man for whatever reason you choose and get help doing it, without any evidence other than your lies, then get rewarded for it. You can get a job or get into college despite there being more capable men. You can deflect any criticism levelled at you by shaming your critic as a misogynist (I know you have done this one lol).

All of these things amount to what the situation REALLY is for western women at this time, whether your privileged mindset can cope with it or not....

You are the most protected, pampered, spoilt class of people that has ever existed on this planet, with far more privileges than any other group... ever.

But that's because the world hates you! lmfao.

Everyone Takes Drugs = Woman is 'Victim'

2011-08-12T14:04:00.003+01:00

Full article here. Emphasis mine.

A JURY yesterday cleared one of three men accused of raping a teenage girl.
Matthew Lodge, 19, was found not guilty of rape atTeesside Crown Court.
The jury is still considering its verdict on the other two defendants, Mark Gallagher, 19, and Scott Duggan, 20.
The prosecution alleged that Mr Lodge, of Manor Grove, Cockfield, County Durham, had taken advantage of a teenage girl, who is not named to protect her identity, after a three-day binge in December 2009 in which she had taken the stimulant mephedrone, leaving her unable to consent to sex.Mr Lodge admitted having sex with the girl and maintained it was fully consensual.
He said Mr Gallagher had sex with her after him outside a pub in Cockfield at her invitation.
The case against Mr Duggan centres on him shouting encouragement at Mr Gallagher as he recorded the incident on his mobile phone.
Mr Lodge said the teenager agreed to have sex with him outdoors, several days after they had consensual sex, while the others watched.
He said: “She asked me if I fancied going for sex.
“Mark had sex with her after I did. She was definitely consenting. I am not a rapist.
I would not rape anybody.”
Mr Gallagher, of Wellgarth, Evenwood, and Mr Duggan, of Bridge Street, Bishop Auckland, deny rape.
The jury will resume deliberations today.

So a little slut decided to go on a three-day-long bender, get completely trashed and have sex with several men (who, I might add, were most probably on drugs too) in public.

Then she wakes up in the morning and thinks 'I can't believe I did that, I am such a slut'.

Driven by the notion that she 'wouldn't normally have done that' if she wasn't wasted, and probably going onto a bullshit rape crisis website to find out that 'if she wasn't sober, she couldn't consent'

And there you have it, she decides that she is a 'victim' of brutal 'rapists' because she doesn't have the self-discipline to maintain her faculties.

Then, after months, after ruined lives and reputations, after god knows how much public money wasted, the jury comes to the conclusion that she is a lying slut and that this man IS NOT A RAPIST.

I'll say that again for anyone that doesn't understand, and for the benefit of the true victim here...

Matthew Lodge is an innocent man, he is NOT a rapist.

Just like the other 94% of people that are accused of rape, and declared innocent.

UPDATE!

The other two guys in this case have been found guilty.

Gallagher said he lost his virginity that night, and said during an interview with police: “If she said no, I would not have.”

That's a bit of a stinker isn't it? The first time you have sex, you go to jail.

Gallagher described her as a nine-out-of-ten on a scale of intoxication, but

told the jury: “She said aye, so I had sex with her... she said I could, so I did.”

Duggan told the jury that throughout their time together, the victim was “laughing and joking on” and that he had no concerns about her state.

You silly boy. This is why the jury have convicted you. Let it serve as a lesson to others....

Don't have sex with drunk women, and if you do, don't admit you knew she was drunk. Furthermore, do not watch your friend have sex with anyone, or you might become a rapist as well.

Come to think of it, I have been raped several times due to my being unable to consent. I'm going to the police now, what do you think they will say?

Alphas are Untouchable? Yeah Right!

2011-08-10T14:43:00.000+01:00

I've just read the new post over at Delusion Damage about alphas, and I thought I should clear things up a little bit for people that may think they can escape misandry and anti-male laws by simply 'being alpha'.

No chance LOL!

In particular this little paragraph is what I'm talking about:

The man who controls a woman’s emotions is beyond the reach of the newly lengthened arm of the law. He doesn’t get falsely accused of rape. He doesn’t get divorced. He doesn’t get sued for child support. He gets what he asks for in the backseat of his pickup truck and then he gets to drive off to his other baby mama’s house where a home-cooked meal waits for him like it’s still the fifties.

I have honestly never read such nonsense in all my life. Don't get me wrong, I think DD is a good writer and writes some nice pieces, (and if you are a gamer then maybe his blog is one of the better ones devoted to game) but this one is way off the mark... WAYYYYYY OFF.

It interests me to know exactly how an alpha can stop false rape accusations. I'm sure Kobe Bryant, DSK, Mike Tyson et al would like to know as well. Are these not alphas, then, DD? I have been a student of game in the past and got about as close to an 'alpha' position as anyone I have ever met. I thought I was untouchable, who gives a fuck what women say/do to other guys when I'm spoilt rotten with female attention?

Am I an alpha male?

Having a woman who is totally in love with you find out you have been philandering 'in the back of your pick-up truck' might just push her into the hands of the feminasty crew, mightn't it? It is almost impossible to control another person's emotions that much within the law.

Then she's smothered with sympathy and told how much of a bastard you are and how she doesn't deserve this treatment and how she and her kids would be better off without you and that to get custody she has to do this and that blah blah. The abuse industry injects the hamster into her brain and before you can say alimonycadabra you're in courts of just-us being told how much of an abusive controlling patriarch you are.

Your 'alphaness' will be the evidence against you, not your saving grace.

Comments Fixed

2011-08-08T15:17:00.000+01:00

For some reason Blogger wasn't allowing anonymous comments here before...

All sorted now though, fire away!

I Hope You Trust Her

2011-08-07T09:57:00.000+01:00

Is your girlfriend going to report you?

I know that you have been abusing her...

How do I know? Well, looking at this list of things that constitute abuse, it is unavoidable!

Notice the fair and gender neutral language. My comments in red.

Choking
Driving dangerously whilst she is in the car
Having her children taken away from her
Undermining her - disagreeing?
Physically preventing her escape
Throwing her
Driving the car at her
Getting information about her from her children - "Daddy, mummy took us to a restaurant and we had fish"
Telling her what to wear - I prefer the black skirt
Withdrawing affection - saying no?
Throwing objects at her
Driving the car at her children
Sending her unwanted gifts - THIS is abuse?
Criticising her appearance - Does my bum look big in this?
Ignoring her - I'm trying to watch football
Attacking her with a weapon
Being violent to others as a lesson to her
Being obsessionally possessive
Criticising her abilities
Refusing to talk to her - I'm trying to watch football
Stabbing
Hurting her in front of her children
Being obsessionally jealous
Criticising her sexual performance - yes darling, it was great the way you bit my penis
Repeatedly interrogating her - one more time, where did you last see the car keys?
Stripping her of clothing and making her stand there
Hurting her children
Watching her at home or work - eyes closed at all times soldier
Criticising her work or housekeeping - great job cleaning the floor darling, I'll go over it again just to make sure :)
Behaving unpredictably - maybe I'll walk home from work today
Forcing her to hurt herself
Hurting her children in front of her
Destroying her letters
Making her do housework in the middle of the night

Keeping her constantly on edge
Forcing her to drink alcohol
Telling stories about how he has hurt others
Sending threatening letters
Making her lick the dinner plates clean
Making her afraid to go to sleep
Forcing her to take drugs
Telling her how he would like to hurt her
Phoning her and making her feel afraid
Criticising her in front of others - thou shalt never be critical of her majesty
Making her afraid to wake up
Withholding medication
Locking her out
Not letting her use the phone
Telling her she is mad

Continually breaking promises
Withholding care if she is ill, disabled or elderly
Keeping her locked in
Cutting off the phone
Telling her she is ugly

Making her do things she doesn't want to do to prove her love
Holding her head underwater
Keeping her locked in a room
Mocking or humiliating her - no jokes please, ever
Telling her she is stupid

Telling her nobody else would want her
Drowning
Keeping her locked in a cupboard or under the stairs
Mocking or humiliating her in front of others
Telling her she is a disgrace
Telling her no-one would believe her
Attempted murder
Taking away her possessions
Abusing her in front of others
Telling her she is a slut - I thought being a slut was ok?

Telling her that his behaviour is normal - What if his behaviour is, and hers isn't?
Murder
Destroying her possessions
Intimidating others so that they do not intervene to help her
Telling her she is useless
Making her accept that his behaviour is normal - even if it is true
Rape
Taking away her clothes
Allowing her no privacy
Telling her she is worthless

Telling her he only abuses her because he loves her
Forced oral sex
Destroying her clothes
Spitting on her
Telling her she is a failure
Minimising the harm that he has caused - do not try to help her!
Forced anal sex
Saying 'next time it will be you'
Urinating on her
Telling her she is a bad mother - even if she is a bad mother

Denying that any abuse has taken place - even if it hasn't
Sexual assault
Vandalising her home
Degrading her
Doing so in front of her children or others
Telling her that it is her fault
Having sex with her when she is asleep
Setting fire to her home
Brainwashing her
Making her think she is mad, ugly, stupid, a disgrace, a slut, useless, worthless, a failure, a bad mother
Making her believe that it is her fault - even if it is

So let's recap quickly...

If (and only if) you are a man. And unless you have followed every single instruction to the letter, and not complained or ever disagreed. You have abused your female partner.

You evil Bastard.

Evolution and Sexuality

2011-08-06T13:08:00.000+01:00

By Dulantha

The purpose of sexuality is reproduction. There are non sexual reproduction methods can be identified among simple beings and as well as within the world of plants. However when the evolution of beings becomes advanced, Sexual reproduction method has promoted well and it became the dominate feature. As a result of transforming beings towards a progressive path, the world of creatures appeared. The world of creatures is superior to the world of plants. Dominate feature of the sexuality of plants is hermaphroditism. But within the world of creatures, unisexual creatures are the dominate group. And the reproduction method also limited only to sexual reproduction within the world of creatures.

In the primary stages of evolution, the method of reproduction is simplex even though it is sexual reproduction. Male and female sex differentiation was also simple and that was only for generate the gametes. Most of simple beings were aquatic. Fertilization between simple male and female gametes occurred. When the creatures become evolutionally advance, the sexuality become advance too. The reproductive organs and tissue became complex. Growing the embryo inside a womb is the most advanced feature of reproduction. External genitals which can be well recognized were appeared. External genitals and the internal reproductive organs are pre determining by the sex chromosomes, so the genetic sex determination has taken the priority. Biochemical functions such as actions of sex hormones are also important in sex determination.

One group of sex, either male or female is dominating the whole species of creatures. The capability of interact with the natural environment more actively is the fact of determining that. Dominating of male creatures is the most recognized feature. Female domination is rare and it is not evolutionally advanced. Mammals are the most advanced creatures in evolution. At last human beings are evolutionally superior to all other creatures. Human sexuality is more advance and it is complex too. Most outstanding feature of human sexuality is the psychological factor and this is known as gender. Physical and genetic factors of sex are common for both human beings and other creatures. If we considered about the hominid evolution, there can be identified a special path of psychological transformation. Human beings created cultural environments and civilized due to this reason. In any culture, gender specifications are conspicuous. Human beings are wearing clothes and this feature is unique to human beings. In any culture there are specific male clothes and specific female clothes. Gender specific human activities can be identified within any culture and they are common. Finally all of these specifications are for better attraction between two sexes. Matching up male sex drive and the female sex drive is an important and essential part of any civilization. Advanced gender specifications are advanced in evolution too.

Back Online!

2011-08-06T13:01:00.000+01:00

After a tortuous period of being back in the dark ages, which lasted far longer than I had anticipated, I'm glad to say that I'm now back online and normal service is resuming :)

(Tip: if you move house make sure the internet and phone line is already installed)

Natural Sexuality and the False Intelligence

2011-07-11T11:04:00.000+01:00

By Dulantha.

This is about human sexuality. We know that gender is the psychological sex of a person. Gender specifications are biologically advanced and also they are progressive according to the hominid evolution. Specifications which are based on the sexuality and sexual attraction between two sexes can be identified within the world of creatures too. But today there is a false intelligence which is teaching people to deem these gender specifications as wrong things. Male gender specifications are representing masculinity and it is strongly attached with the natural male sex drive. And female gender specifications are representing femininity and it is strongly attached with the female sex drive too. Naturally there is a sexual attraction between gender specifications. So what is wrong with specifying human activities according to the gender and matching up male and female sex drives?

A group of people are trying to show their intelligence by spreading out an unpleasant attitude about that and fighting against the natural sexuality. They are bashing heterosexual related activities. But they are very keen to generalize homosexuality. Not only do males have male brains, females have female brains too. Men cannot establish the whole society based on masculinity alone. There must be a corresponding formation which is setting up by women based on the femininity (Real femininity). Gender specifications are actually important for that. So what is wrong with this gender based categorizing of human activities, if we are speaking words like men, women, male, and female….etc? According to the false intelligence, gender based categorizing of human activities is wrong and it is a social injustice for women. Why aren't these intelligent people giving any chance for women to think as women based on their natural femininity and female feelings?

All of the specific female activities are corresponding to specific male activities. Women who are really feminine know how to establish the female community corresponding to men’s social creations. The false intelligence teaches everyone to deem all of the gender specifications man made and they are injustice for women. Have women no feelings to respond to male feelings? According to the false intelligence, women are there to fight with men and hate male feelings.

The other thing is falsely intelligent people are bashing the family foundation. According to nature the male body type and sexual characteristics are designed to interact with the environment more actively and efficiently. The female body type and sexual characteristics are designed for growing an embryo inside a womb and nourishing babies by breast feeding after birth. So what is wrong with men working hard, protecting and maintaining their families while women are nurturing children and staying at home? If all of these things are wrong and the whole structure of the society is injustice for women... why do they exist? Because they are accepted by nature.

Stealing words and giving wrong definitions for them is another fraud of these false intelligent people. Now they are trying to bash natural sexuality by using the words like “Rape”, “Sexual abuse”, “Sex offender”, “Child abuse”, “Sexual assault”…….etc. We know these things are wrong. But these wrong things are relative and they must be compared with a well established acceptable sexual lifestyle which is natural. The false intelligence teaches this sexual lifestyle is wrong as well. According to the falsely intelligent people, women and girls are sex objects of men and boys. They deem it is wrong. These hypocrites must apply this logic to their mothers and their wives. The false intelligent hypocrites are using the above mentioned terms as their weapons to fight against the acceptable sexual lifestyle.

There is another important thing. It is that false intelligence is always opposing gender specifications and the gender based categorizing of human activities. But they want to talk about the gender based violence against women. If the violence is related to sexuality, women are suddenly reminded that they are women. We must remember one thing. That is, all of us here in the human society are born as a result of natural sexuality. Now it is time to think wisely and give up the hypocrisy. Falsely intelligent people are cheating on themselves. Finally they are stupid, selfish, lazy and irresponsible. They know only how to eat, drink and sleep. They are pretending and misleading the society by misusing words while they are unable to set up the society. They do not know what will happen to their own sexuality in future. They are destroying their own nationalities by themselves as well.

Real Risk Assesment

2011-06-30T11:27:00.000+01:00

By AfOR

Any man who has been dragged into Family Court by his skank ho ex will be introduced to the subject of Risk Assessment before he is allowed anywhere near his own children, and indeed Risk Assessment will be used to justify keeping him away from his own children.
This is what Risk Assessment ACTUALLY is, so that you can spot the difference when you get to Court.
I’ll have to start out with TRUE risk, and TRUE Risk Assessment though…
There is this bridge like structure, you want to build a house on it, you have the house designed, you just want to know if it will all be safe.
First of all there is the physical real world, where the only way to know for sure is to do it (the difference between practice and theory being greater in practice than in theory) and see what happens, which is why I can take you out and show you 500 year old buildings still in daily use that look like they are going to fall down in the next ten minutes, and why I can show you the ruins of where buildings did collapse that “shouldn’t” have.
Up until 1900 that was pretty much how the world worked, you’d go out and build that house on the bridge, and if it was still standing today you were right.
Today we would do a risk assessment, what is the weight of the house you want to build, what is the strength of the bridge, but the fact is that this is a model, not reality, it is at best an educated guess, but it cannot account for a hidden flaw in the bridge structure or subsequent re-purposing of the house as a store to store very heavy items, or a million other factors.
It is a model of reality, not reality itself.
A competent engineer will not merely admit this fact, he will hammer it into you at the outset, he will hammer into you the FACT that by definition no matter how good the model and modelling is, it ALWAYS, BY DEFINITION, fails to accurately mimic the reality.
A competent engineer will also hammer into you the FACT that the amount that the model differs from reality is also, BY DEFINITION, an unknown factor, which is of course quite logical, everything that is not unknown is simply factored into the model, the trouble is, is you make a model based solely on know for a fact factors, you end up with a useless model, so people stick in a whole pile of fudge factors and rules of thumb, that are, BY DEFINITION, not physical laws which have anything at all to do with the reality, and which only relate to how models differ from reality, in an attempt to make the models more useful.
The fact is, for fairly simple things that work on fairly simple and well known and understood physical laws, such as building a house on a bridge, we have gotten fairly good at this, in fact we have gotten so good that we no longer build bridges with enough excess stability and strength to carry a house at some later date…. we no longer build static structures with massive deadweight, we build dynamic structures with very little effective mass at all.
We no longer build bridges that will last 500 or 1,000 years, we build bridges that will last 50 or maybe 100 years.
Our modelling has become so good that we have cut excess strength and therefore cost and material away, and now we survey the bridge every year, to ensure it is still safe for human use.
Our modelling has, in effect, allowed us to build crappy cheap stuff that is inherently more dangerous in the long run, for periods starting say 50 years after initial construction onwards.
So, back to the family courts…
In reality, I pose “X” danger to my kids, that is reality and it cannot be changed, I am either a predatory paedophile aiming to sexually abuse my own children or I am not, and statistically speaking children are safer for sexual or violent abuse from their own biological fathers than from anyone else on the planet, including their mothers, but even that does not affect single cases such as me and my kids, or you and your house and your bridge.
The statistics and modelling affect the odds of someone wanting to make a bet on the unknown factor of whether I will bugger my own kids, or whether your house on a bridge will collapse, but they do not affect the reality of me buggering my own kids or your house on a bridge collapsing one iota.
Compared to weather prediction, building a house on a bridge is child’s play, and compared to calculating the risk of me buggering my own children, weather prediction is child’s play.
Calculating the odds on your house on a bridge collapsing is trivially simple, given around 1,000 data points I can calculate the odds on any crappy old personal computer in a couple of seconds.
Calculating the odds on there being a storm next week is much, much much harder, it takes hundreds of millions of data points and supercomputer computing power running in realtime at world speed, and it is still hopelessly imaccurate even one or two months in the future.
Calculating the odds of me buggering my own kids would take quadrillions of data points and quantum computing power, and would be hopelessly inaccurate 12 hours in the future.
Nevertheless, in the Family Courts you will have so called self appointed “experts” who have perhaps 100 data points, many of which will be completely false and misleading as supplied by your psycho skank ho ex, and instead of giving the only possible answer, which is “vastly insufficient data” they simply proceed.
This is itself a telling characteristsic, the so called structural engineer who was prepared to venture an opinion of whether your house on a bridge will collapse based upon ten data points, half of which are not data about the subject, but slanderous and unsupported accusations about you, the builder is nothing more than a charlatan who should be imprisoned for fraud and banned from every going anywhere near the subject ever again on pain of death.
Yet in the family court this is exactly what the so called “expert” risk assessor does, they go right ahead on zero data and then proceed to pass judgement on a subject that is so complex that it makes detailed long range weather forecasting look like adding 2 + 2.
But wait, it gets worse, far, far, far worse….
Build a house on a bridge is a simple binary yes/no question, many questions, such as child custody and access are not binary, they are closer to questions like this;
If we build this new road, X people per year will be killed on it, but it will allow the transportation of ambulances and fire engines and police cars which will save Y lives per year… is Y sufficiently greater than X to justify building the road?
In THIS question the engineer has to FACTOR IN HIS OWN DECISIONS into the final outcome, it is not simply a case of playing safe and saying NO to the guy who wants to build a house on a bridge, thus guaranteeing nobody is killed, saying NO to this road means saying yes to Y killed every year, and we don’t know what Y is, until we do the study….
But wait, it gets worse, far, far, far worse.
Let’s just say we have done all the math to the best of our ability and integrity.
Let’s say 10 people a year will be killed on the road, and 100 people a year will be saved by the road.
While we are at it let’s say there is a 1% chance the house on the bridge will collapse any one year, and if you think that is high, think again, no modern bridge is built to last 100 years, so actually you calculate it more like APR interest rates, 1.1% compounded per year.
The big problem is that all these numbers are about playing the odds, the odds are X that SOMEONE will be killed on a road, that a house will collapse, that a child will be buggered by their own father.
But, BY DEFINITION, you cannot apply these odds to a single individual, you cannot work out what the odds are that one Johnny Smith will be killed on the road, saved by the road, killed by the collapsing house on the bridge, saved and sheltered by it, buggered by his daddy, or saved from his psycho skank ho mummy by being with his daddy.
If you COULD, you could simply go into a betting shop and place the same bet at 10:1 odds ten times in a row and take them to court and win when they did not pay out…
This is why when people take companies to court for negligence, a massive part of the case is spent in arguing that the claimant is not some random statistical person, but an individual known to the company in question, eg John Smith who has twice complained about the brakes on the company vehicle before being injured in an accident with a company vehicle with defective brakes.
NOBODY ever won such a court case by saying “the projections during the consultation period said that 3 people a year would die on this new road, and my husband was one of them, so pay me one million dollars compensation”
And yet, this is EXACTLY WHAT THESE SELF PROCLAIMED RISK ASSESSORS ROUTINELY DO IN FAMILY COURT.
The known and very real statistical risk posed by removing a child from the biological father, who we know for a fact is statistically the safest person on the planet they can possibly be with, is simply dismissed because that is statistics and you are an individual, yet ten minutes later this same argument will be turned on it’s head and used against you because you are an individual and these statistics say you will bugger your own children the first chance you get.
Nota Bene;
DNA evidence is EXACTLY THE SAME THING.
There is NO SUCH THING as a DNA match or DNA fingerprint, nobody has ever been found with duplicate fingerprints for another living or dead human being, but WITHOUT EXCEPTION, ALL DNA ANALYSIS in the legal system is nothing more than statistical analysis and modelling based upon assumed odds and assumed probabilities.
NOT PHYSICAL SCIENCE.
Not actual physical artifacts of any kind are actually examined for a match, instead the shadows cast by certain minute fragments of DNA are compared with the shadows cast by other equally minute fragments, and the rest is PURE STATISTICS based largely on assumptions that have themselves never been proven or verified to even the slightest degree.
I keep going back to quote Carl Sagan on what happens when you have a society based upon science and technology which is run by stupid cunts who lack clue #1 about science and technology.
Your family court risk assessor is not merely utterly incompetent at the whole subject of risk assessment and probability, even before she brought her own misandric prejudices to the table, she is too fucking stupid to even begin to understand just how incompetent and fucking clueless she is.
The police and prosecutors who start citing your “DNA match” as proof you were the murderer are also too fucking stupid to even begin to understand why they are too fucking stupid to be allowed anywhere near the job they have.
To be clear on this point of DNA.
You can use current DNA technology to CATEGORICALLY exclude any connection between two samples, so you can say this sample and this sample are without any doubt quite different and separate.
eg; there were plenty of fingerprints around the crime scene and one the murder weapon, but none of them match Mr Smith’s, substitute DNA for fingerprints.
eg; there were plenty of semen samples in the alleged victims’ vagina, but none of them match Mr Smith’s
are inaccurate and dishonest, albeit truthful as far as they go… they should say, and none of them match Mr Smith’s, nor could they belong to Mr Smith’s children, or parents, or cousins, nor could they belong to anyone from Mr Smiths lineage or historical genetic location / region where his ancestors lived.
That would be truthful and accurate, because statistics, analysis and modelling are really good at 0.000% answers, 0.000% is not really close to 0.001%, you can divide any number by any number except zero, and 0.000% is zero.
Statistically speaking there is a 0.000% chance that a male dog can inseminate and impregnate a female human… it doesn’t matter how often you try, it can never happen…
Statistically speaking every analysis that simply omits huge chunks of relevant data, such as the fact that kids are safer with their biological fathers than anyone else on the entire planet INCLUDING THE FUCKING JUDGE, has a 0.000% chance of coming to either a safe or accurate conclusion.
Statistically speaking every analysis that simply omits the effects of the modelling itself on the subject is doomed to failure and has a 0.000% chance of coming to a safe or accurate conclusion.

Despite no priors, not even arrests or suspicions, not even peripherally involved with anyone who was either, for anything at all, my family court case decided, on the basis of precisely zero physical evidence, nothing whatsoever except the accusations of the psycho skank ho ex, corroborated by said self appointed “experts”, that I am extremely violent, that I am a rapist of adult women, that I am a raging heroin addict and alcoholic (of course, I am in denial of all of this…) and that I am also, contrary to ALL psychological material and data on the subject of sexual deviancy, an extreme sexual risk to my own kids, from toddler age upwards, irrespective of their sex.

So there you have it.
Statistically speaking dude, I have to tell you that you have exactly a 0.000% probability of getting an accurate risk assessment of your potential (and your ex’s potential) risk to your own kids in a family court.
You have been warned… so get used to it, shrug, and walk away, much better than failing to grasp the reality and going postal.

You can read much more from AfOR at wimminz.wordpress.com

Women Against Feminism

2011-06-26T11:10:00.000+01:00

A recent comment from stonerwithaboner led me to this great article, by a woman, discussing her rejection of feminism.

So here is my rationale for why I oppose ALL and EVERY FEMINIST THEORY. If you are a feminist but do not subscribe to any of these assumptions/beliefs, then let me know. But I expect there is not one feminist who doesn’t broadly speaking accept these tenets:
1) Feminism is based on an assumption that overall, men as a group hold power in society and this power, damages women as a group.
2) The above assumption, no matter what feminists say, relies on a belief in and a reinforcement of the essentialist binary view of gender (i.e. that male v female men v women masculine v feminine are real and important distinctions. That is how feminists justify their belief that ‘men’ hold power over ‘women’)
3) This means that in order to present these assumptions as ‘fact’, men are demonised by feminism as a whole. Feminism is, by its very nature, misandrist. e.g. concepts such as ‘rape culture’ and ‘patriarchy’ and ‘violence against women and girls’ and ‘the male gaze’ and ‘objectification’ rely on making out men are not decent people, in general, as a group. To be accepted as decent human beings, the onus is placed by feminists onto men to prove their worth, and to prove why they differ from the (socialised or innate) ‘norm’ of dominant masculinity.
4) The focus on men’s power over women in ‘patriarchal’ society ignores other divisions between people and is essentially, ‘heteronormative’. It makes out the division between heterosexual (cis) men and (cis) women is the one that is dominant in society, and the one that is most important for feminist analysis/critique. So feminist theorists such as bell hooks and Julia Serano and Beverly Skeggs, even when they are referring to other divisions such as ethnicity, class and transgender identities, are still relying on the reification of the man v woman binary to support all their arguments about gender.
5) Feminism does not allow for these above challenges to be made to it without it having a hissy fit or banning its critics from websites/fora or saying ‘but you don’t understand’ or ‘feminism is not monolithic’. Feminism cannot stand up to critique.
6) Feminism is based on self-interest. The adoption of a feminist analysis of women in society is presented by feminists as in women’s interests. This is why feminists are able to look with contempt and/or pity on non-feminist women. As if they are somehow not valuing themselves as women and as people. But making a whole political ideology out of self-interest of a particular group in society, is, in my opinion, conservative and selfish. When feminists mock people who ask about men’s discrimination with their ‘whatabouttehmenz’ taunt, they are mocking women who think and care about others, and men who think about and care about each other and themselves. So feminism expects women to be selfish and men to be self-less. And people who do not or will not fit into the binary, to not exist at all.

More and more women are jumping off the femboat and realizing that it is damaging everyone.

I'm sure by now you have seen ChristyOMisty's youtube videos, no?

I think this is definitely the way forward. The more women we have against feminism the quicker it will die.

Hurrah!

UPDATE!!!

Check out this great youtube channel with no less than 50 (yes, FIFTY at time of writing) videos of women that are opposed to feminism... great job!

Campus Rape is a Total Myth

2011-06-25T23:59:00.000+01:00

Yes, I know. This subject has been beaten to death from both sides of the argument on numerous websites. However, right now I’m going to do something different, I’m going to disprove (or at least make you seriously doubt) all the hysteria about mass rape on American college campuses simply by asking you three questions, which I’m yet to hear ANY answer to. Do YOU have any?

To give you some background in case you are uninformed on the subject, the myth of mass campus rape has been spread for decades in the United States. It’s earmarked by widely spouted, widely accepted statements like, “1 in 4 girls will be sexually assaulted during their college career.” Feminists regularly espouse that between ¼ and ½ of girls are raped at college (yes really, I can’t even type that without shaking my head at how untrue that really is, but this is commonly said throughout the country as if it were as true as Newton’s laws of gravity). Everyone from the vice president of the country to pop singers to women at Ivy League colleges in their valedictorian speeches repeat this without question as if it were as true as the sky is blue.

As has been discussed elsewhere no one can even settle on what “1 in ___” phrase is actually correct to use. I’m not getting into that because regardless of what plainly inaccurate phrase some spew, the message is the same; there is mass rape on US campuses. Sure. So, if you earnestly believe there is mass rape on US campuses, please read on, and ask yourself the following questions.

So you are saying “1 in _____ women are raped at college.” Really? Even at colleges that are 90% women and 10% men? Even at incredibly strict religious and military colleges where men and women aren’t allowed to bunk together, have consensual sex or even hold hands in public? Even at colleges where alcohol is banned on campus? Even at Catholic colleges? Even at colleges that have 380 students? How can ANYONE say that “1 in___” phrase is true across the board?

If “1 in _____ women are raped at college,” why the FUCK would girls en masse voluntarily go to such a place where they KNEW for a fact they had such a high percentage chance of being raped? Is a stupid degree really worth a lifetime of mental and emotional trauma? If the above phrase is true WHY do women go to colleges that are male majority or are known as “party schools,” knowing such a grievous crime is likely to occur to them? Doesn’t that seem incredibly unsafe in retrospect?

If “1 in ___ girls are raped at college” is true why would loving mothers (oh and fathers too), feminists, and everyone else who buys into the aforementioned phrase send their beloved daughters, nieces, cousins, etc. into such rape hell holes (aka US college campuses) KNOWING ahead of time that there is such a high chance that they will suffer the worst fate outside of being outright murdered?

Here some more things to consider…why aren’t women doing more to protect themselves (like carrying guns, knives, tasers, pepper spray, etc. instead of silly little “rape whistles) if they KNOW they are in the “mass rape zone” that is a college campus? Why isn’t there more security of every kind on college campuses if mass

rapes akin to the ones of the Rwanda genocide are taking place on site? Why DOES everyone keep repeating the cycle of how things are right now if they KNOW it’s leading to mass rape of all the women of the country? Why all of these points and so many more?

There is no answer. Just reality.

I have nothing else to say, because nothing else needs to be said.

THE WITCH QUEEN SAYS IT IS WRONG

I’m now going to tell you about a bunch of ridiculous things my acquaintance Morgan the Witch Queen (who left several comments on this site), a self-described hardcore feminist said to me and how insanely double standard they all are, revealing that feminism, is really not about equality.

Old Morgan told me it’s WRONG/TOO BAD for a woman to marry/be with a male police officer or a soldier because she has to sit around all day wondering if they were killed in the line of duty and that is NOT RIGHT for a woman to have to go through that. Really, Morgan? So is it then okay for all the husbands and boyfriends of female police officers and soldiers to sit around all day and wonder if their spouse/partner was killed in the line of duty or is that also NOT RIGHT? Oh wait should they all just “suck it up” because they’re men?

Old Morgan told me it’s WRONG for a woman to get on her knees to give a man oral sex, it establishes the dominance of man over woman, its degrading, and blah, blah. Really, Morgan? So what if a man gets on his knees to give a woman oral sex? Is that psycho domineering and degrading or is it “empowering” and “liberating?”

Old Morgan told me a man ejaculating on a woman’s face is also psycho domineering, degrading, the marking of territory like an animal, blah, blah, blah. Really, Morgan? So what if a woman ejaculates on a man’s face? Is that also psycho domineering and “the marking of territory” or is it again…just “empowering?” Hmm, Ihave a feeling I know how many women and feminists would answer.

Old Morgan told me that women who make false rape claims should get fined and face a lawsuit because that is where “precedent sits” and accusing someone of someone of something terrible is still less bad than the actual heinous act occurring. Really, Morgan? I guess we should have never ended slavery, integrated schools, ended alcohol prohibition, or any other landmark case, because guess what? There was no precedent there either. Sometimes you have to make precedent, when things are just flat out wrong and outdated. Hey everyone we SHOULDN’T have changed those laws on stealing sheep because precedent sat on the side of “you steal my sheep you die.” You also need to make precedent when it becomes clear your punishment is ineffective. Giving someone a fine for knowingly destroying or severely damaging another’s life and causing mass panic and rape hysteria, is hardly an effective punishment. Anyone would say that.

I don’t think Old Morgan knows just how insanely damaging and society destroying a false rape claim can be. I’m going to go on the record and say this, if there was a false rape claim where an African-American girl said a Caucasian male raped her in the city of Newark, NJ (a city I’ve been commuting to for 3 years and attended university in)…there would literally be riots, assaults, ACTUAL sexual assaults, and people being murdered in the street. That’s not an exaggeration to say and you can ask anyone who knows the city of Newark the same thing and they will give you the same answer.

This has happened before, cities have been under siege and actual crimes have been committed due to false rape claims. Actual murders have taken place due to false rape claims. A false rape claim many times does not just stay between two people and one courtroom; it breaks free to cause hysteria and chaos elsewhere. This is just the reality of rape hysteria and what happens when people get caught up in it. I caused riot, fine me please.

Until next time,

Dr. Capt. Stownwhal Jaxson

R.I.P. Thomas Ball

2011-06-24T15:08:00.000+01:00

Seeing as the mainstream is ignoring his tragic tale, here is his last chilling statement in full. Don't worry Thomas, we are continuing the fight for you.

Last Statement
by Tom Ball

A man walks up to the main door of the Keene N.H. County Courthouse, douses himself with gasoline and lights a match. And everyone wants to know why.
Apparently the old general was right. Death is not the worst of evil.
I am due in court the end of the month. The ex-wife lawyer wants me jailed for back child support. The amount ranges from $2,200. to $3,000. depending on who you ask. Not big money after being separated over ten years and unemployed for the last two. But I do owe it. If I show up for court without the money and the lawyer say jail, then the judge will have the bailiff take me into custody. There really are no surprises on how the system works once you know how it actually works. And it does not work anything like they taught you in high school history or civics class.
I could have made a phone call or two and borrowed the money. But I am done being bullied for being a man. I cannot believe these people in Washington are so stupid to think they can govern Americans with an iron fist. Twenty-five years ago, the federal government declared war on men. It is time now to see how committed they are to their cause. It is time, boys, to give them a taste of war.
There are two kinds of bureaucrats you need to know; the ones that say and the ones that do. The bridge between them is something I call The Second Set of Books. I have some figures of the success of their labors. You and I are in these numbers, as well as our spouses and children. But first let me tell you how I ended up in this rabbit hole.
My story starts with the infamous slapping incident of April 2001. While putting my four year old daughter to bed, she began licking my hand. After giving her three verbal warnings I slapped her. She got a cut lip. My wife asked me to leave to calm things down.
When I returned hours later, my wife said the police were by and said I could not stay there that night. The next day the police came by my work and arrested me, booked me, and then returned me to work. Later on Peter, the parts manager, asked me if I and the old lady would be able to work this out. I told him no. I could not figure out why she had called the police. And bail condition prevented me from asking her. So I no longer trusted her judgment.
After six months of me not lifting a finger to save this marriage, she filed for divorce. Almost two years after the incident, I was talking with her on the phone. She told me that night she had called a mental health provider we had for one of the kids. Wendy, the counselor told my then wife that if she did not call the police on me, then she too would be arrested.
Suddenly, everything made sense. She is the type that believes that people in authority actually know what they are talking about. If both she and I were arrested, what would happen to our three children, ages 7,4 and 1? They would end up in State custody. So my wife called the police on her husband to protect the children. And who was she protecting the kids from? Not her husband, the father of these children. She was protecting them from the State of New Hampshire.
This country is run by idiots.
The police sergeant Freyer screwed this up from the get go. When I got the Court Complaint form the box was checked that said Domestic Violence Related. I could not believe that slapping your child was domestic violence. So I looked up the law. Minor custodial children are exempted. Apparently, 93% of American parents still spank, slap or pinch their children. To this day I still wonder if Freyer would have made this arrest if it had been the mother that had slapped the child.
Labeling someone's action as domestic violence in American in the 21st century is akin to labeling someone a Jew in Germany in the 1930's. The entire legal weight of the state is coming down on him. But I consider myself lucky. My family was destroyed. But that poor bastard in Germany had his family literally annihilated.
Arrests are mandatory for the police in New Hampshire for domestic violence. That is not law. That is police department policy. Laws come from the Legislature and the Governor's office together. God only knows where these policies come from. The State's Attorney General also has a mandatory arrest protocol for domestic violence. I call these policies, procedures and protocols The Second Set of Books. You never cover the Second Set of Books your junior year in high school. That because we are not suppose to have a Second Set of Books. This is America-we have the rule of law.
I am a regular guy, a coffee and cheeseburger type of fellow. As remarkable as my life has been, I figure that what happens to me must be happening to others as well. I was 48 years old when I got arrested here for my first time. So I went looking for the arrest numbers for domestic violence, this new group that I had unwilling joined. I could not find anything. So I wrote the U.S. Dept. of Justice in Washington. They wrote back that they did not keep track of domestic violence arrests. The FBI keeps track of all other crimes. How come not domestic violence? I thought some low level clerk was blowing me off.
At the time, I had mailing addresses in both New Hampshire and Massachusetts. So I wrote to all six Congressional offices, the two Senators from each state and the two Congressman. They like doing favors for constituents hoping you will favorably remember their name in the voting booth. All six offices reported back the same thing. They do not know how many arrests for domestic violence have been made. I immediately knew something was wrong. And I also knew this was not going to be good.
Improvise, adapt and overcome. The Army teaches that to every soldier it trains. They say that no battle plan survives the first five minutes of combat. So your people on the ground had better be able to think for themselves. Taking casualties in war is just an occupational hazard. Taking casualties and not accomplishing your mission is a disaster. After 21 years of Army service, I am pretty good at improvising.
The first thing I found was a study not of domestic violence arrests but of domestic violence injuries for 18 unnamed states and the D.C. in the year 2000. In the study 51% of the injuries were 'no injuries'. So I knew I had a study of police reports. Who else but a police officer would record no injuries? I populated that out to the 50 states and came up with 874,000 arrest in the year 2000.
I had originally populated the number back to 1994 when the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) was enacted into law. I would later find out these arrests stated with the U.S. Attorney General's Task Force of Domestic Violence ten years earlier in 1984. As individual states data became available for various years and states, I would incorporated in to my informal study. The number I have now in 2011 is 36 million adults have been arrested for domestic violence. I have a gut feeling this number could be as high as 55 million. But I only have data to 36 million. So 36 million it stays. And there is a really cool trick you can do once you have this number. You can find out how many American men. women and children ended up homeless because of these arrests.
Most of the domestic violence statistics I have seen break down with 75% male and 25% female being arrested. So I am going to used the male pronoun for the one arrested spouse and the female pronoun for the victim spouse. That should make the domestic violence feminists ecstatic-man bad, woman good. But that is okay because that is probably the last nice thing I am going to do for them today.
When then a man is arrested for domestic violence, one of two things can happen. If they are only dating and have separate apartments, then he can head home. But if they are living together, then this fellow has a real problem. Bail conditions and then a possible protective or restraining order prevent him from being with her. So he needs to find a new place to live, at least until the charges are resolved. The King of his Castle is no longer allowed into his castle. A feminist name Pence who wrote that was absolutely giddy at that outcome. So he can get his own place if he has enough money. Or he can move in with his mother, his sister or another relative. He might have a girl friend who would let him stay with her. And if none of this is possible, well then I guess he is sleeping in his car down by the river.
If he has minor children, money will soon turn into an issue. Most men I know do not mind paying child support. They want their kids to have food on their plates, clothes on their backs, and a roof over their heads. But it does stress that man's finances. Child support is usually 33% of the man's gross income. Withholding for taxes, social security and health insurance can range up to 28% of his gross paycheck. So a man making $500 a week gross has only $825 monthly left over after withholding and child support. That is not enough money for an apartment here in Central Massachusetts. That does not include other expenses like heating, electric, gas, groceries, telephone, cable, car payment and car insurance. So he is in a financial hole. Estimates of homeless men run 82% to 94%. I am going to round that down to 80%.
After the King has left his castle, his wife runs into a problem. She was use to getting his whole paycheck for the household. Now she get a third for child support. Figure they both work and made the same money, her budget went from 100% down to 66%. If she was running the house on $3,045. a month when the King was home, now without him she only has $2,220. Most households in America cannot withstand a 27% hit on the household account. She'll juggle the bills but eventually most wives figure out that they can pay all the smaller bills if they just does not pay the big bill. That would be the rent or the mortgage. So six to nine months after the King is out of the castle, the Queen, the Princes and the Princesses are also on the street. Domestic violence feminists state that 50% of victim spouses of domestic violence end up homeless at some time in their lives.
The last group of homeless from these arrests are children. The domestic violence feminists state that 70% of domestic violence couple have children. So 50% female times 70% children equals 35%. But children is plural. So we will double to 70%.
(Odd isn't it? They know that 50% of victim spouses end up homeless and that 70% of them have children. How can they know the percentages when they do not know how many total arrests were made? Those people at the U.S. Justice Dept. cannot even pull off a credible cover-up. )
Men are 0.8, women are 0.5, and children are 0.7 for a grand total of 2.0 homeless Americans for every domestic violence arrest. Multiply that by 36 million and you get 72 million men, women and children ending up homeless at some point in their lives over the last 25 years because of these domestic violence arrests.
That is a really large number even by Washington standards. That is almost 25% of the entire population of the U.S. using 2010 census figures. Which begs the question did these homeless people contribute to this latest economic meltdown, or did they cause it? Because if they did cause it then the recovery will not be measure in months or years but in decades.
Some of the boys in the Father's Movement think Congress might have shot themselves in the foot over this one. Personally, I think they shot themselves some place anatomically higher. No wonder the Speaker of the House is always crying. The Dummies on the Potomac.
Twenty-five years ago the federal government start pushing these arrests on state's legal systems. Now, we have an economy on the rope. They have thrown a huge amount of money at banks, big business and local and states government. And we are still in the mud. But no economist either at the Treasury Dept., Federal Reserve, universities or think tanks are even looking at the impact of all these broken families. If that 36 million arrest is correct, then 72 million men and women, have been throw out of the middle class into subsistence living. Or is the number 55 million and 110 million? No one knows and no one is even looking. But why should look? According to the Attorney General, we do not know how many arrests we have made.
And if the Tea Party is any indication, insurrection is brewing in the land. Just a coincident? Not likely. This is what happens when the government wipes out the middle class.
The idea for these arrests came from something called the Minneapolis Police Experiment (MPE) of 1981-82. In the experiment police offices were given pads with one of three words written on them; counsel, send or arrest. Counsel meant the officer was to try to mediate the couple's spat. Send was to send one of the spouses out of the house for eight hours as a cooling off period. Arrest was arrest one of the two spouses. The officer was to do as the top paper on the pad said to do. The experiment was set up by the Police Foundation and Lawrence W. Sherman was the lead researcher. The results show counseling resulted in a future assault in 24% cases, send was 19%, and the arrest option resulted in a future assault in only 10% of the cases. Perhaps a cheap way of cutting down future domestic violence.
In 1984 The U. S. Attorney General's Task Force of Domestic Violence recommended arrest as the primary weapon in domestic violence assault. Lawrence W. Sherman recommend not using the arrests because the MPE was just one study and it could be wrong. They ignored him. And by 1992, 93% of the police departments in the nation had adopted some form of mandatory arrest in domestic violence cases.
But by 1992 five more addition studies similar to the MPE became available. Lawrence W. Sherman reviewed all five studies. Then once again he wrote that the police should not use arrest. In two of the five studies, they found the same result as they did in the MPE, that an arrest cut down the odds of a future assault. But in the other three studies an arrest actually increase the odds of a future assault. So arresting someone in a domestic violence situation to cut down on future assaults did not work any better than just flipping a coin. I do not know if Lawrence W. Sherman is still alive. But fortunately he wrote a book call Policing Domestic Violence that was published in 1992.
So we have 800,000 American police officers arresting one in every six adults in the country and throwing 25% of the men, women and children out on the streets in an effort to enforce a policy that they knew did not work back in1992. And I had always assumed that you needed a man to really screw something up. Oh well, there goes another glass ceiling.
Why would they push an arrest policy that does not work? There are two schools of thought on the reason why. The first comes from Lawrence W. Sherman. He calls it the Law of Just Desserts. Revenge for slights and offenses, real or imagined. I am sure there are some that would argue that women are not vengeful. But what is that old saying? Hell hath no fury.....
The second idea comes from the mother of the second wave of feminism. I do speak of the brilliant Betty Friedan. In the Epilogue Chapter of the 20th Anniversary Edition of her book The Feminine Mystique, Betty relayed why she resigned as the first president of the National Organization of Women in 1970. Betty wrote that she, "was unable to openly fight the man haters and unwilling to front for them any more..." So man hating bigots no only existed 40 years ago, they were also grabbing power. Now Washington is funding them. Makes you wonder what bigots they will fund next. Maybe the Klan?
Feminists had always claimed that when women took over, we would have a kinder, gentler, more nurturing world. After 36 million arrests and 72 million evictions what we got was Joe Stalin.
The third wave of feminists do not like to call themselves feminists. The word feminist could be perceived as gender oppression. These third wave of whatever-we-call-you got that right The treachery of our legal system over the last 25 years may end up giving all feminists a bad name. Which would make us as bigoted as the man-hating feminists who got us into this mess to begin with.
So let us talk about those bureaucrats that do. These are the ones that actually carry out the evil deeds. I like call them the do-bies.
Any one swept up into legal mess is usually astonished at what they see. They cannot believe what the police, prosecutors and judges are doing. It is so blatantly wrong. Well, I can assure you that everything they do is logical and by the book. The confusion you have with them is you both are using different sets of books. You are using the old First Set of Books- the Constitution, the general laws or statutes and the court ruling sometime call Common Law. They are using the newer Second Set of Books. That is the collection of the policy, procedures and protocols. Once you know what set of books everyone is using, then everything they do looks logical and upright. And do not bother trying to argue with me that there is no Second Set of Books. I have my own copies at home. Or at least a good hunk of the important part of it.
I got my Second Set of Books when I sued the Jaffrey NH police department. Under the discovery rule, I write them with the material I wanted and it would arrive in the mail a few weeks later. I got the Police Academy Training Manual. I got the Department's Policy and Procedure Manual. I got the no-drop protocol that the attorney general sent to all his or her prosecutors. I even got the domestic violence protocols for the court system, one hundred pages worth. Once you read it the material, then you will know what the police, prosecutors and judges will do. They are completely predictable once you know what set of books they are using.
The police academy training manual states that an arrest in a domestic violence call is the preferred response. They cite the Minneapolis Police Experiment (MPE) as its justification. But the author of the MPE, Lawrence Sherman, said do not use arrest because five follow up studies show that it did not work. The would be a violation of the 4th Amendment in the First Set of Books against unreasonable search and seizure. Then there is that whole issue of whether the police have the right to arrest for any reason other than they believe a crime was committed.
The Jaffrey Police Department Policy and Procedures Manual states that if a wife says she does not want her husband arrested, the police are to ignore her, arrest the husband, and get with the prosecutor to see what they can work out. In other words, make the arrest and then see if you can Mickey Mouse it. The wife is eligible for spousal immunity. If she invokes it, then no statement she mades, written or oral, are admissible because she cannot be cross examined about it under oath. ( Did you say that? What did you mean when you said that?) With no statements the police have no probable cause in most cases to make an arrest. Also a violation of the 4th amendment in the First Set of Books.
The actor Nickolas Cage was drunk in New Orleans with his wife. Everyone else is drunk in New Orleans, so why should Nick be any different. He and his wife were arguing over which house the rented for their stay. Nick grab his wife's arm and started to lead her to his house. The police arrested Nick for domestic violence. His wife was stunned. That was not domestic violence. "Nothing we can do," the police explained to her. "Just following orders."
That is an accurate explanation for victims, even if they do not think of themselves as victims. The police have a zero tolerance towards any physical contact. Things might get worse in the future is the feminist logical for this present iron fist approach to domestic relations. I would have to agree with them. After all the arrests, poverty, homelessness and misery, I can assure you-things are going to get worse.
But that nothing we can do, just following orders the officers explain always sounds so timid and lame. The police need to punch their explanation up a bit, make it more authoritarian. And there is a quick, low cost way of doing it. The police officers only need to say it in its original German.
The state Constitution in NH said the prosecutors job is to promote justice. The Attorney Generals protocols said that domestic violence case are no-drop cases. (Unless, of course, they take the Deal. Continue the case for a year, go to counseling, and everything falls off the books after the year. They did after all find some way of getting rid of all these cases.)
The Attorney General can hire, fire, layoff, promote, demote, commend or award bonuses. The constitution is some old, quaint, dusty document up in the Statehouse some where. So which one do you think is going to get obeyed?
Prosecutors are funny. Some, maybe most, have egos the size of Cape Cod. But of the three, police, prosecutor and judges, prosecutors have the least protection. Micheal Nifong, the prosecutor in the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case, was fired, disbarred, convicted of a crime, and actually jailed for trying to enforce the no-drop prosecution protocol for sexual assault in the Duke case.
The prosecutor in my criminal case fared a little better. I filed a complaint with his boss for summoning my two daughters, ages 7 and 4, to court. I had already conceded that the facts were not in dispute. The trial would be about the law. No witness were need much less a couple of toddlers. He still summoned them. (The Second Set of Books tells the prosecutors to get a sympathetic face in front of the judge or jury. What's more sympathetic than toddlers.) The prosecutor could not refute my allegation because I enclosed a copy of the trial transcript. I had to pay for the transcript. When the prosecutor read it, he gave his two weeks notice and then blew town. That transcript was the best $46 I had ever spent in this life.
There is a name for what happens when a bureaucrat is destroyed by the First Set of Books for attempting to enforce the Second Set of Books. It is called the Abu Ghraib Syndrome. The people within the law enforcement community no longer seem to know the difference between the law, with its checks and balances, and the policies, procedure and protocols that constitute The Second Set of Books. In some cases you do not even know who wrote the policy, procedure or protocol. It could have been the local high school gym teacher for all anyone knows. Many of these bureaucrats are eventually going to learn the different between the First and the Second Set of Books. And my guess is that many of them are going to learn it the hard way. Because the only checks and balances in The Second Set of Books is The First Set of Books.
Judges routinely use our children as bargaining chips. Get the adult into counseling, continue the case for a year, and then drop it. This will open up the docket for the new arrests coming in next week. These judges that use our children are not honorable. Which is why I never use the term 'Your Honor' any more. I just call them judge.
Alex Baldwin, the actor, wrote that you have never seen a coward until you have seen a Los Angeles County judge. I call my judges-Sullivan, Arnold and even Runyon-cowards, too. When I first started observing them, nothing made sense. Arnold was completely infuriated when he was maneuvered into ruling not guilty. He verbally went up and down me so many times I lost count. What was the big deal? If I was not guilty just say and then we could all go home. But that was back in the days before I knew about The Second Set of Books.
I lost visitation with my two daughters when I got arrested. One was the victim-the other was the witness. After a not guilty, I expected to get visitation with my girls. But the divorce judge, Sullivan, decreed that counseling was in order and they would decide when we would reunite. I told the judge that the decision on whether these two girls had a father or a fatherless childhood was not leaving this courthouse. There would be a couple of reason for that decision.
First, by then I knew of the Second Set of Books. As much as I had prayed for the return of my children, I knew that this counseling might get thrown in the way. Judges are addicted to counseling like a meth-head is addict to crystal meth. Sullivan wrote in the divorce decree that he envision only one or two meetings with the counselor. There is no counseling done in the first meeting or two. It is intake-who's the players and what are the issues. But Sullivan was not interested in counseling. He merely wanted to unload the decision out of habit. And if we do not shut them down now, they will be doing it to our kids in twenty years from now when they have little ones running around the house.
Second, just exactly where does the buck stop with our legal system? Police have to make an arrest. The prosecutor has to pursue the case. Judges now also walk a away without rendering a verdict, and passing the buck does not constitute a decision. Can those mental health counselors slide the decision over to someone else? Just where does this end? Who is responsible? Who is accountable?
The mental health crowd is the third reason I said no. Some people think they are geniuses with their Masters and PH D's. Others think they are so wacky that they call them fruit loops. Well, I have a third name for them. Suckers. They did not get hired for their medical ability. They got these because they were willing to take these cases off the judge's hands. Which has done nothing for the credibility for their profession. We are not here to help-we are here to unload. And they created a liability that did not previously existed. If a judge releases a defendant and he goes kills someone, that judge or the judiciary cannot be sued. But a mental health worker, and their employer certainly can be held liable. Our judiciary is now using the mental health field like a ten dollar whore.
I sued Monadnock Family Services to make them go away. I told their lawyer Byron that they were a legitimate target for men. We settled for no money. They would have nothing to do with this reconciliation. The counselor was released. And they would no longer get involved in any domestic violence cases.
Every time we ended back in court over whatever squabbles, I would ask Judge Sullivan for my children back. The decision belong to the counselors he would tell me. But he knew he had screwed up. I could see it in his face. But he would not fix it. He would not step out of that box those domestic violence/sexual assault advocates had built for him. After five years, he retired to a part time position at the Littleton courthouse 120 miles away.
So when guys like Alex Baldwin and I call judges cowards, we have legitimate reasons for doing so. It is not good for judges to be called coward. It is unlikely that it is good for the rest of us.
I do not claim to have all The Second Set of Book. I know of one book that I do not have. And I would have love to read that one. That would be the seminar that the domestic violence and sexual assault advocates put on periodically for legal personnel including judges. These advocates are camped outside every state, not federal, courthouse in America. The U.S. Dept of Justice provides 50-100% of their funding depending on the program. They have three day seminars at resorts where everything is paid for except the liquor. Judges in NH are ordered to attend. Neither Sullivan or Arnold would confirm or deny they had attended. They actually said nothing. It must be like the Masons where they will not say anything about the organization until you show them the secret hand sign.
Supreme Court Judge Louis Brandeis once wrote that the best description of a judge is the impartial guardian of the rule of law. How does three days of wine, women and song contribute to impartiality? It does not. So it should not have been any surprise that they would not answer me. After all, they were not on trial. I was. But they are going to be. They were suppose to protect to rule of law not collaborate in its demise. They have failed miserably.
A guardian ad litem is an attorney appointed for a child. The attorney solely represents the child. I got one when I was first separated to get a neutral pair of eyes and ears on the family. I was disappointed in his findings.
A few years later, another guardian was appointed for one of the kids. A regular report filed with the Court painted me as some sort violent psychopath. I thought that was uncalled for seeing as we had never met. It start a flurry of nasty letters between until we both came to the conclusion that this was not about us. We ended on a friendly note.
At a Court hearing later on I approached him. I asked him if he had had any domestic violence training. He said yes, that it was required to become certified as a guardian ad litem. Another chapter for The Second Set of Books that I never managed to acquire.. So men, if you were thinking about getting a guardian ad litem for an unbiased assessment, then you should ask for the domestic violence material that certified the guardian. And do not worry that you are not sure what you are looking for. It will stand right out.
There are more sections of The Second Set of Books. Medical personnel are supposed to report suspected domestic violence. The college professor Angela Davis has a story of a Latino couple in California getting in trouble feeding the dog his liver for dinner. Mental health employees are also required. Think of Wendy threatening our kids with foster care. Teachers, day care providers, the list just goes on and on. The East German secret police, the Stazi, had 25% of the population on record as informers. The United States is not that high yet, but we are still growing.
These people-police, prosecutors and judges-are suppose to protect us. They are checks and balances to prevent injustice. That is why we spend so much money of police training. But if the police screw it up, the prosecutor can catch it. If the prosecutor misses it then the judge can step in to fix it. But if all three have been compromised, then what does one need to do to get justice? Go to the appeals court or the Supreme Court? That seem a little ridiculous particularly when the zero tolerance has arrests for something as trivial as touching.
On one hand we have the law. On the other hand we have what we are really going to do-the policies, procedures and protocols. The rule of law is dead. Now we have 50 states with legal systems as good as any third world banana republic. Men are demonized and the women and children end up as suffering as well.
So boys, we need to start burning down police stations and courthouses. The Second Set of Books originated in Washington. But the dirty deeds are being carried out by our local police, prosecutors and judges. These are the people we pay good money to protect us and our families. And what do we get for our tax money? Collaborators who are no different than the Vichy of France or the Quislings of Norway during the Second World War. All because they go along to get along. They are an embarrassment, the whole lot of them. And they need to be held accountable. So burn them out.
In the last 25 years they have arrested one in six adults in this country and forced 25% of the men, women and children into homelessness. In 50 years it will be one in three adults arrested and 50% of the men, women and children ending up homeless. Most of our kids will live to the age of 68 years old. As bad as it was for you, your children will have twice the odds of it happening to them.
Some of you will say that 50% homelessness sounds absurd. But 25% is absurd and that is already here. There is no evidence that the police, courts, or government is planning to do anything different in the immediate future. And they will not do anything different until we make it so uncomfortable that they must change. Bureaucracy at its worst. So burn them out. This is too important to be using that touchy-feeling coaching that is so popular with business these days. You need to flatten them, like Wile E. Coyote. They need to be taught never to replace the rule of law. BURN-THEM-OUT!
Most of the police stations built in New England over the last 20 years are stone or brick. Fortunately, the roofs are still wood. The advantage of fire on the roof is that it is above the sprinklers. But even the sprinklers going off work to our advantage. There is no way they can work in a building with six inches of water. And I am certain we will disrupt their momentum once they start working out of a FEMA trailers. If they still do not get the message, then burn down the trailers.
The easiest way of burning a building is with the Molotov cocktail. It was invented by the Finns when the Soviets invaded in 1939. You fill a bottle with gasoline and stuff a rag in the end for a wick. You light the wick and throw bottle, It shatters on impact spraying gas everywhere and the wick ignites the gas. Simple, readily available, and effective. And only two things to remember.
First, use a glass bottle. Thinner glass is better than thicker glass. You want it to shatter on impact. When I was teaching a kid at the high school on the West Side Worcester, MA. threw a Molotov cocktail into his school. Fortunately, he used a plastic bottle. It burned about three square inches of carpeting. I had to laugh when I said to myself, "Thank God for dumb kids."
Second, you need to tie the rag to the bottle. Nothing worse that throwing a Molotov cocktail, landing where you wanted it, and having it shatter perfectly. Then you noticed the wick had fallen out on the way to the target. No wick-no fire.
Some of these building will have brick faces and metal roofs. Just break a window and throw the Molotov cocktail inside. Carpets, furniture, computer plastic, even paint on the walls will burn. It is okay if the sprinkler goes off. I wonder if you can get hip waders over a gun belt?
We had a kid in my hometown that burned down the old junior high school. He walked up to the front door one night with a can of lighter fluid. The applicator on the end squirts the lighter fluid out. He squirted under the door and along the seams and lit a match. The kid took out the entire old part of the building. Why are kids so competent when it is something they should not be doing?
There will be some casualties in this war. Some killed, some wounded, some captured. Some of them will be theirs. Some of the casualties will be ours.
Now, nobody wants to get killed. But let us look at your life. You are broke after paying child support. She and the kids are not doing any better. None of you are middle class any more. You have no say in the kids education, their health treatment, you may not even have visitation with your sons and daughters. And everything you thought you knew to be true-the rule of law, the sanctity of the of the family, the belief that government was there to nurture your brood-all turned out to be a lie. Face it boys, we are no longer fathers. We are just piggy banks.
So you are not losing anything by picking up the Molotov cocktail. It may be too late for us. But without something changing, your kids will have double the odds of it happening to them. That will knock them out of the middle class again, providing they ever get back in. And their kids, your grandchildren, will end up damaged goods before it is over. So it is okay to run. You just need to turn around and run at them. They are no way as imposing as they seem. They only do what they do for a paycheck.
Television would make us believe that people get arrested because of fingerprints, DNA, facial recognition, and instruments that can tell where a substance was made and here is the local distributors. It is Hollywood crap. Most of the people in prison are there for one key reason. They could not keep their mouths shut. They told someone. That someone told others. The cops hear it and start looking at them for a suspect. That how it works in real life.
This need to confess seems to be primeval. Just human nature. But if you cannot keep a secret, do not expect the one you tell to keep their mouth shut. There is only three people I know for certain they will keep their mouths shut. That would be Jesus, Mary and Joseph.
I only managed to get the main door of the Cheshire County Courthouse in Keene, NH. I would appreciate it if some of you boys would finish the job for me. They harmed my children. The place is evil. So take it out
Some where along the line I picked up the crazy notion that it is better to be dead as a free man than to live as a serf. The government needs to be a little more careful about what they teach in our schools.
And bring a can of spray paint to these fires. Paint the word COLLABORATORS ( two L's with an S on the end) on the building before you burn it. Maybe we can shame them back to the rule of law. And we do want the police to know exactly who burned the building. Then the police can start interviewing the usually suspects, all 36 million of us.
We have covered the do-bies. Now let us look at the bureaucrats that say-ers.
The Second Set of Books originated in Office of Violence Against Women (OVW) which is part of the United States Department of Justice. Some of these policies, procedures and protocol were developed locally. But the local results would be sent up to OVW and, if approved, would disperse it out to all 50 states. They are smart, clever, bigoted and able to lie as well as any politician that ever called Washington home. In other words, they have now become Washington insiders.
But what makes them so uniques is their anger towards men, any man. They are so twisted in their hatred of men that they are positively scary. And it is not what they are doing to men that makes them frightening. You would expect that. No, it is what they are doing to the women and children that makes them so twisted.
When the Pentagon drops a bomb on innocent civilians the military calls it Collateral Damage. It sounds better than, "Yeah, we killed a bunch of women and children." Those poor, innocent, stupid civilians have always been caught in the middle since the time we were fighting with rocks.. Your wife and kids are Collateral Damage in the war against you, the man in the family. For 25 years these feminists at OVAW have been willing to sacrifice the women and children to get you. And they cannot claim ignorance about what they are doing. Under the VAWA the federal government is funding at least 1,800 homeless shelters. As long as the Office for Violence Against Women exists in the U.S. Department Justice , no American man, women or child will be safe in their own home.
If you ask these feminists why are the shelters all full, they will not say because of all the arrests. The shelters are full because of men. But they knew from the beginning that this was not man bad-woman good thing. The year was 1976. Two things would happen that year.
First, someone at the U.S. Dept of Justice decided to count the dead bodies. In 1975 there were 1522 women killed in domestic violence. And for men killed in 1975? The dead for men was 1506. Statistically equal a friend tells me so.
If you had asked me before the study, I would have assumed that women were getting the worst of it. But I would be looking at it by genders. What I should have been looking at was species, homo-sapiens, human beings. Men are human-women are human. Being the same species you would expect the same results from both genders. And that is exactly what the dead bodies told us.
The second thing that happened in 1976 was the first domestic violence survey was released. It was so new the time that they called it family violence. Murray Straus of UNH and Richard Gellars from a school in RI were the researchers. They did not find two perpetrators of domestic violence, but three. Men initiated violence 25.7% of the time: women 25.2%, and the other 49.1% was the two going after each at the same time. These two people going after each other at the same time is well recognized in law. The law in NH calls that mutual combat. Men are human. Women are human. And once again we found both genders acting the same manner.
So how did we end up with the theory of man bad-woman good that the government at all levels is using? The feminist writer Susan Brownmiller wrote In Our Time that," the way you get funding and church donations is to talk about the pure victims. If you talk about the impurity of the victim, the sympathy vanishes." If women get to be good then men get what is left-bad. Man bad-woman good was originally a funding raising technique. After 35 years, it has turned into official government dogma at all levels, from the local cop on the beat to the White House. Men need to be punished, restrained and retrained. Your wives and children are, unfortunately, just collateral damage in this effort to punish men. So you were not dreaming it. There really is a government pogrom against men.
When a man batters or kills, there is no excuse. When a woman commits the same act, there is nothing but excuses. Simple though inaccurate. But there is one redeeming aspect to men being demonized. Now we men can act like devils. And we do not even need to apologize for it. Men are going to start acting just like they made us out to be. As an old high school semi-punk I can assure you boys of one thing. This is going to be fun. You guys are going to end up laughing like hyenas.
The money funded under the VAWA is split in two when it leaves the Treasury. Part goes the Health and Human Services for fund these domestic violence homeless shelters. If that 36 million number is correct, and it is all that we have, then the 1.44 million arrests a year will be made producing 2.88 million homeless Americans each year. Women and children constitute 60% of these homeless people, 1.7 million Americans a year. Shutting down these shelters would be cruel. What would these women and children do then? Go live under a bridge. No, we are stuck with these shelters for a while. But there is one thing that Congress needs to fix when they fund them again.
These shelters do not allow men on the property let alone inside the residences. Why is it against the law to use federal money on organizations that discriminate against black, Jews, gays or even women but it is okay to do so against men? Men contributed half that tax money. Eight years ago a man in California fled with his children after the police warned him to get out after they had arrested the wife and mother. None of the shelters would take him and the kids in because he was a man. I wonder if this would survive a legal gender discrimination challenge in a federal court?
A society without men is freakier than a world without blacks or Jews. That is not to say blacks or Jews are any less worthy. It just that there are more men in the world than blacks or Jews even if you combined them. If these feminist had to deal with men on a regular basis, then maybe the country would not be in the pickle we are in now.
There is a third reason to end this discrimination, something of a more practical nature. Apparently, some women like to have sex with men. But men are barred from the property. Suddenly, that 15 year boy two doors down starts looking real good. It might even be fun breaking in this new meat. So this woman driven into insolvency by the push for domestic violence arrests now finds herself charged as a pedophile because someone barred men from her world. With domestic violence advocates as friends, who needs enemies.
This shelters came up with a novel approach to fixing the pedophile problem. Male children over the age of thirteen are barred from staying there. Too troublesome. The family broke up when the father was thrown out of the house. Now a second break up is happening with the teenage boys. Perhaps a relative has one bed available. Maybe the family of a high school friend would take him in their home. If neither option works then that is okay. He can move in with his father. Then they will both be sleeping in the car down by the river.
Children of these parents also suffer. They used to have their own bedroom in a safe town with good schools. First they have a shelter, then Section 8 public housing. An urban school. Maybe good-maybe not. Kids learn how to be tough in an urban environment. The kids might go bad or they could come out just fine. But there will be no clunky car as a teenager. There will be no saving fund for college. There will be no monetary gift to use as a down payment for a starter home. This tradition of the older generation giving the younger generation a financial leg up has been ruin due to the older generation's lack of money. Financially, the older generation is merely treading water. It will take generations after these present two generations to repair the economic damage to these families.
So we are stuck with funding these shelters for a while. These women and children have no place left to go. Some of you guys may think that these feminist caused the problem and then created the solution. But homeless shelters are not a solution. They are just barely a band aid.
The remaining money under VAWA goes to the United States Department of Justice for the Office of Violence Against Women (OVW). As long as OVW exists then the government is at war with men. As long as there is a pogrom against men, then women and children are going to end up as collateral damage. So there is no need for discussion about OVW going. The only thing we need to figure out is which of the two ways we can use to get rid of them-the easy way or the hard way.
And boys, do not try to burn down Washington's Dept. of Justice Building in an effort to get rid of the Office of Violence Against Women. Their offices are over at N Street.
The easy way is using Congress. The VAWA comes up for funding every five to seven years. Next time it comes up, Congress votes no and everyone at the OVW gets a pink slip in late September. Nice and simple except nothing is simple in Washington. We, the people out here in the sticks, do not always know what the dynamics are in Washington. There might be one method of getting Congress on course. Have Congress demand that the Attorney General get, and release the arrests figures. Or have the President order it. He is usually fearless after he makes up his mind. And this is too large and too well known to continue the Washington plausible deniable routine. Then they will know how much trouble they are in because of these arrests.
There are 220 million adults 18 or older in this country of both sexes. If my figure of 36 million is correct, then that is 16.4% of the adults have been arrested. It could be as high as 55 million or 25%. It might be as low as 22 million or 10%. Whatever the number there are two things that Congress should know. First, is the fellow who discovered the arrests in Minneapolis back in 1992 said do not use it because it does not work. And second, the people arrested now constitute a Fifth Column here in the United States. Our loyalty to Washington is gone. But what did these genuises on the Potomac expect? They have harmed our children. If they think Al Qaeda is a pain in the ass, wait to they see what Americans can do once their fuse is lit.
I am certain the Attorney General will sit for months on the request for the number of domestic violence arrests. Then he will explain that they do not readily have the number and that some sort of Manhattan Project effort will be needed in time and money. Nonsense. When Washington started these arrests in 1984 over 6.3 personal computers were sold here in the U.S. That figure does not include all the mini's, midi's and mainframe computers sold that year. There is no way they can pretend that this data does not exist in electronic storage. A request to Ohio for the arrests 1984-2010 would tie up a state clerk for an hour, including their 15 minute coffee break. Time for the truth boys and girls. Because this is not going away.
The hard way is more time consuming, cost more money and is full of headaches. Because the only way of removing a department from the federal government without the consent of Congress is to take out the entire federal government.
The first time I heard that, I said that is ridiculous. We cannot run this country without a federal government. But we will replace the old government with something new and improved. The new government would honor the debts incurred by the old government. There are a lot of useful reasons for starting with a clean slate.
The bipartisan debt commission released their recommendation for cleaning up the $14 trillion we have borrowed over the years. Convention wisdom has it that Congress has no stomach for any of the recommendations.
But a new government could install those recommendation on day one. Three years later, most Americans will not remember that anything is different. The old government laid off its employees when it closed. The new government is hiring. But instead of 65,000 employees at the Dept. of Education, the new government is only hiring 45,000. Instead of an average federal wage of $70,000 a year, the new average will be $52,000. The new government will have to write a tax code. Everyone pays 15% with no deductions. How many IRS employees could you get rid of if there were no more deductions? Any thing is possible with a new government.
Normally over-throwing a elected government is considered treason. Treason is punishable by death here in the United States. But there is one way of over throwing the government. That is through the ballot box. Then it is not treason but democracy. Allegedly, Washington is in favor of democracy, particularly if their candidate wins.
There is no legal mechanism in the Constitution or the Federal code of the United States for dissolving the government of the United States. So that is what we need first. Congress would need to write it. We get them to do it through the ballot initiative.
A ballot initiative is when enough registered voters sign a petition to get a question on the ballot for the next election. The following would be a sample of what the question would look like in New Hampshire.

That all elected representatives from the state of New Hampshire to both houses of the United States Congress are to propose and advance a bill that would set up a legal mechanism to dissolve the United States government should the people decide to do so in a general election by a simple majority.
If this initiative passes in all 50 states then Congress will be stuck. They will have to write the law to dissolve. If they do not I suspect within ten years they will be standing in a stairwell at the British or French embassy with a suitcase in hand waiting to get to a rooftop helicopter. I doubt if they will be thinking about the humiliation of being thrown out of the country. They will be far too busy worrying about what will happen if the mob gets their hands on them.
Washington has not got a friend in the world. Even the British and Israelis loath them now. Kind of a bad time to be losing domestic support. And what they done over the last 25 years? They have wiped out the middle class pandering to a special interest group of bigots. And in typical Washington fashion, they did not even know they did it.
This Ivy League inbreeding in Washington has produced an elite that knows what best. Everyone else-husbands, wives, police officers, prosecutors, judges, attorney generals and guardian ad litems-are to shut up and do what they are told. The rule of law is gone, replaced by the policies, procedures and protocols of The Second Set of Books. Which means the federal government will be going shortly. For the government being unable to deliver the rule of law is like an auto mechanic who claims he does not know how to change the engine oil. A certain minimum competency is required. So it looks like the parents of the Washington elite were right. One can be too smart for their own good.
Betty Friedan wrote that the feminist revolution, like any revolution, would have its excesses. Losing the rule of law is too great to call it a mere excess. It is a catastrophe. It is the heart, mind and soul between the people and their government. These feelings of betrayal by losing it may be permanent. I have 21 years of Army service going back to the Vietnam War. My loyalty to the government should be a given. It is gone. I am certain it will never return regardless of how long I might have lived.
It was another woman that lead us in to this decision to clean house inside the beltway. Something she taught us fifty years ago. You simply look at those folks in Washington and then ask yourself the old Ann Landers question, "Am I better off with them, or without them? Are my children better off with them, or without them?" They are sinking like stones.
Washington, DC was chose as the capital because it was the geographical center or the old Colonies. Today, the geographical center of the country is just west of St. Louis Missouri. The new government can set the capital anywhere in the United States it wants. Imagine how many rodents, insects and parasites they could lose by moving 1500 miles west.
Whether you replace the federal government or not, men are still going to need a legal defense center for men. Something like the NAACP used to get black people their rights. The only checks and balances in the Second Set of Books is the First Set of Books. Which means lawsuits. Now I know you guys are broke. Some of you have had your wives and kids thrown into homelessness. So I completely understand when you tell me that you are broke. But if everyone who has been arrested throws in $10.00 a year then the legal defense center will have a war chest of $360 million. You can buy a whole bunch of lawsuit with that kind of money.
The Ball family has been supplying sergeants to the Army since at least the Revolutionary War. Elijah served as a sergeant in Cushing's Regiment at the Battle of Bennington. His commanding officer was a general from NH with a name of John Stark. General Start was a clever warrior. He was responsible for the bulk of the heavy casualties the British suffer at their victory at Bunker Hill. His orderly, fighting withdrawal allowed the other units on the hill to not only retreat but collect their wounded on the way out.
General Stark would repeat this performance on three hill tops outside the village of Bennington VT one hot August day in 1777. At the end of the battle, the British lost over 900 men killed or captured. The Colonists suffered 30 dead. Two months later, the depleted British army would surrender at Saratoga. That victory at Saratoga would bring the French into the war. John Stark was the most competent general this country ever produced. For that reason alone his men loved him.
But as brilliant as he was on the battlefield, General Stark would become even more famous for something he said. In 1809 the veterans of Bennington decided to have one last reunion. A delegation called on the General with his invitation. But the General was old and frail. He could not attend. But he did send a message, "You tell the boys I said live free or die. That death is not the worst of evil." Since 1945 the State of New Hampshire has stamped Live Free or Die on every pen, coffee mug, license plate and highway sign that they have gotten their hands on.
I think the General and his sergeant would be please that his words have elevated from the novelties and bric-a-brac to something more dignified like a courthouse door. Neither of them would give a second thought to the mess left over after the fire was extinguished. War has always been a grim business. Civil wars are usually worse.
But they would be trouble by the new enemy. Oh, they understood when a government betrays it people. They took up arms against the super power of their day to get relief for their grievances. But the enemy we face now is the government that these men birthed at places like Bennington, Saratoga and Bunker Hill. Government is no different than the food in a refrigerator. Given enough time both will go bad.
The smartest person I knew in this life was my mother. Perhaps that is true of all of us. Maybe I just got lucky. She was a nurse by trade. She worked in a time when Western medicine made that final transition from butchery to science. But it would not be her nursing skills that made her extraordinary. No, it would be this one incredible knack she had that I had only modest success at mimicking in my life. If she had something important to say to you, she would say and then never mention it again. She would talk about it if you raised the issue. But she never mentioned it twice on her own. And, oddly, you always heard her.
But she did have one favorite saying. I must have heard in a thousand times in the eighteen years I lived under her roof. It always came at the end of the conversation as she peeled away to see if it was time for Perry Mason or Lawrence Welk. She would turn her head to the side, and over her shoulder she would say, "And the only thing you really have in this world is your family." Now, thanks to the United States Government, neither we nor our children have that.
. I have three things to say to my children. First, Daddy loves you. Second, you are my three most favorite people in the world. And last, that you are to stick together no matter how old you get or how far apart you live. Because it is like Grandma always said. The only thing you really have in this world is your family.

Rights for 'Wrong'

2011-06-24T14:14:00.000+01:00

By Dulantha

The human civilization did not originate all of a sudden. And after being created, human beings were not civilized all of a sudden either. Today we can speak languages, but the definitions of words which we are using in any language can be identified within specific social backgrounds which are created by human beings.

Without a human society nobody can say whether something is right or wrong, good or bad, fair or unfair. Reason is the relativity of these things to the society. If we considered the word of rights, we cannot talk about human rights without human society. As I have mentioned within my previous blog when people are adding more requirements to their lives in addition to major requirements they become selfish too.

Because when people have more requirements, they have to earn more and they need more resources. And they need to spend more time to manage and utilize more resources too. Allowing all the people to become equal in status within a community may not be practical. But when the resources are distributed equally within a community, people can aggregate with common requirements. And also they can spend more time accomplishing the social responsibilities. Social responsibilities are more important than the rights for them too. Within a situation like that the expectations of people are common, but the way of handling resources can be different person to person. However the way of transforming human activities is common.

When people become more selfish, they need more rights for their privacy. On the other hand when the privacy becomes important, social responsibilities become unimportant to them. They are struggling with responsibilities and co-operation of the society. Finally they are trying to get rid of them by using the rights. As a result of that different groups of people can be arise with different expectations in the society. Some times they can be exactly opposite the expectations of one person to another person. Growing up a situation like that can lead only to a huge conflict. Some people do not like to live with more responsibilities, but they want to utilize the common resources. On the other hand, they may not participate to build the society. Some times they do not agree with the formation of the society, but they never explain what should be the alternative.

Some groups of people think that there should be rights for them to go beyond cultural and moral bounds. Finally, these things are destroying the long time existence of human kind.

Tell the World How You Feel

2011-06-22T20:00:00.000+01:00

Have you had a bad experience with feminism or women? Have you had kids taken from you? Been falsely accused? Been discriminated against in court or at work? Been abused by women? Have strong feelings about the subject and want a platform to tell people? Why not write an article and get it published here?

Anything will be considered. If you have a story to tell then I’d love to hear it, so would the readers here I’m sure. Even if you think you aren’t a great writer or have poor grammar/spelling don’t worry… I can help you with that when you send it to me. If you can describe how you feel then we could put something very provocative together… and being provocative is what this site is all about.

Maybe you have something to say that you think might be too ‘extreme’ for more reputable sites. WE are the ‘fringe loonies’, as it were (ie: showing no restraint, much like feminists). Maybe you often leave comments at other sites but would like to write something bigger that stays around longer, with your name tagged to it. Maybe you would like to start your own blog but don’t have the time/energy and would still like to be heard. Maybe you just want to say a big FUCK YOU to the world.

If that is the case then perfect! It would have to be pretty darn bad if I were to deem it too ‘extreme’ for this site, or too poor to improve. Like I say any and all applications will be very much considered. Do not worry about swearing or appearing angry, just show us how you feel. You would get called a misogynist anyway… Does it really bother you that someone might say it here? If you really do 'hate' women, then let us know, and explain why you feel that way. Something must have made you feel like that and your experience is as valid as anybody's.

One thing to remember though…

Your views are yours and yours alone, and anything you submit will always be attributed to your name (pseudonym if you wish) here in the sidebar of the site. I don’t plan on taking the site down anytime soon so you can rest assured that your piece(s) will be searchable online for many years to come. You will always be able to say that you contributed to the downfall of feminism!

So if you have been reading about these issues and/or have been affected by them at all… Let the world know about it! I don’t think the enemy, or the general public for that matter, quite realize how angry men are about this stuff. I think it is time to show them.

Simply leave a comment here and I will send you an e-mail to discuss any articles, stories, or any ideas you have. What could be easier?

You can also contact me through twitter or youtube if you wish.

Happy writing!

STFU You Misogynist!

2011-06-22T13:07:00.000+01:00

Just as an example of how people react when they hear something about RAYYYPE that questions the status quo or women’s perpetual victim status. Here is a conversation I had today on twitter:

heathen_chick Caroline

@Theevilpenis (Re: my post on false rape allegations) Where are you getting the information for this article and your views on the subject?

(ED: This was sent in March, to my embarrassment I didn’t figure out how to read any tweets @you until today , lol)

Theevilpenis The Evil Penis

@heathen_chick The citation is in the article

heathen_chick Caroline

@Theevilpenis you are responding from March?

Theevilpenis The Evil Penis

@heathen_chick Yes :)

heathen_chick Caroline

@Theevilpenis what info do you have about pedophiles raping children? Do you think that is false too? Children just lie about that?

(ED: This woman DIDN’T EVEN READ THE ARTICLE. She just saw the headline and took off on her moral quest to silence the misogynist. Just for extra spice, she projects her fantastic ideas about paedophilia onto me)

Theevilpenis The Evil Penis

@heathen_chick Do not mischaracterise my words. I state very clearly what I think, without any mention of paedophilia.

Theevilpenis The Evil Penis

@heathen_chick This.Time.Read.The.Article.One.Word.At.A.Time.

heathen_chick Caroline

@Theevilpenis rape is rape. What in your eyes would make you happy? With regards to what you are fighting for. What would be perfect?

(ED: She is Joe Biden in disguise! I think the article is pretty clear on this point too)

heathen_chick Caroline

@Theevilpenis if you are willing to have an honest conversation. I would strongly suggest that you refrain from condescending me.

(ED: Get that? This silly cow thinks that her coming to my twitter account to call me pedophile by deliberately mischaracterizing what I wrote IS OK. While my calling her out on not actually having read/understood the article IS NOT OK. Hypocrisy, anyone?)

Theevilpenis The Evil Penis

@heathen_chick Who is condescending? You self righteous indignant #bitch, I make a statement of fact and you try to twist my words.

(ED: No messing around)

Theevilpenis The Evil Penis

@heathen_chick "I suppose you think kids just lie too", talk about having a serious conversation #feminazi

(ED: what I really meant to say here was '...and YOU talk to me about having an HONEST conversation')

Theevilpenis The Evil Penis

@heathen_chick What is #rape? human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/s…

(ED: Another article, in response to her Bidenesque ‘rape is rape’, that she didn’t read/understand)

heathen_chick Caroline

@Theevilpenis Thanks for coming out. I honesty wanted to know what you are fighting for. I can see now it is to promote hate. Good luck.

(ED: more shaming and trying to get around any real debate)

Theevilpenis The Evil Penis

@heathen_chick And how is it to promote hate exactly? give me one example. I promote justice and fairness under the law.

(ED: needless to say but she refrained from actually explaining her comment, and saying specifically how I am promoting hate)

heathen_chick Caroline

@Theevilpenis Good day to you sir. I am done with you.

(ED: now she is trying to act civil. What is civil about calling a man a paedophile with absolutely ZERO justification? Clue: hating men is ok)

Theevilpenis The Evil Penis

@heathen_chick #epicfail, #feminists can't answer one simple question, rather just tries to shame #men

heathen_chick Caroline

@Theevilpenis Look! You are looking for a fight. You are in a bad mood. Take it somewhere else. I am not interested #feminists #men

Theevilpenis The Evil Penis

@heathen_chick Au contraire! you implied that I'm a pedophile, how do you expect me to respond? I think it is you looking for a fight!

heathen_chick Caroline

@Theevilpenis Go get some help. There is something wrong with you. I am requesting that you leave me alone. Don't contact me again

(ED: Is this bitch serious? She contacts me to have a hissyfit about paedophilia, then makes out as if I’m harassing her because I stood up to her!)

Theevilpenis The Evil Penis

@heathen_chick You contacted me... stop trying to shame me and other men. Read my blog and learn all you want about me.

See what men have to put up with sometimes? Defend men and criticize women, no matter how convincing or true your stance is, and you are a hateful misogynist!!

THEY DON’T EVEN NEED TO ACTUALLY READ WHAT YOU’VE SAID.

How Desperate Must You Be?

2011-06-22T09:50:00.000+01:00

I'm sure you have heard about this...

A man BURNS HIMSELF because of the injustice of the family courts.

How many women have done this for being 'raped' or 'abused'?

Do you think men are angry? Do you think men are upset?

No obviously they are just pissy about losing their privilege!

Be prepared for more like this, along with murder, arson, kidnap and more.

Until men get equality, they will keep fighting.

Absurd UK Rape Laws

2011-06-20T21:48:00.000+01:00

The laws regarding rape in the UK are completely unjustified. I am worried that more and more men are being victimised by women. The laws themselves are dripping with misandry, making women think it is OK to rape men in our rape culture.

Rape

(1)A person (A) commits an offence if—

(a)she intentionally envelops or covers the penis, anus or mouth of another person (B) with her vagina,

(b)B does not consent to the covering, and

(c)A does not reasonably believe that B consents.

(2)Whether a belief is reasonable is to be determined having regard to all the circumstances, including any steps A has taken to ascertain whether B consents.

(3)Sections 75 and 76 apply to an offence under this section.

(4)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for life.

These laws are so sexist it is unbelievable, especially when you consider the long term implications of being victimised in such a way. We all know that men don’t lie about rape, so the standard of proof needs to be lowered. Too many women are getting away with this horrible, disgusting crime. Men have taken to the streets giving out bottle stops to other men to stop them from being ‘date-raped’. This must have been a success because there hasn’t been a case of drugs being found in a man’s blood stream after being raped. Good job guys.

I’m also sick of all these ‘egalitarians’ saying that men who make false accusations of rape should get more severe punishments. If the man feels like he has been raped then she must’ve done something wrong. Most likely, radical Masculist Ivor Biggun suggests, “following a well known pattern of female privilege and oppression”. If she was trying to maintain her power then she is guilty, in my eyes. The poor man deserves to be recognised as a victim, not charged with a crime.

The amount of compensation that the man receives is unacceptable too. £12, 000 in exchange for having your life destroyed? These silly egalitarian extremists think that the accused woman should be given anonymity… what a joke! If the woman is paraded on national news, maybe more male victims will come forward.

We demand that the laws be strengthened to make more men feel safe.

Imagine this was real and the laws were like this. Imagine that men were campaigning incessantly to make the law more unfair to women.

Then consider that IT IS TRUE, BUT WITH THE GENDER ROLES REVERSED.

All thanks to feminism.

Rape vs Rape Rape

2011-06-19T04:10:00.000+01:00

Another post by the inimitable Dr Capt. Stownwhal Jaxson...

Last year in the United States the case of Phoebe Prince was a regularly mentioned story in the

media, followed from the start until it’s finish. Phoebe Prince was 15-year old Irish immigrant high

school girl who committed suicide after months of being harassed and assaulted by her classmates.

How does this story fit into this blog? Well, it involved “rape.” No, not forcible, criminal, stranger, scary

rape, but “statutory rape” as it’s called here in the United Sates. Often referred to as “not rape rape.”

What is statutory rape? Well it’s an offense where a male over the age of 18 has consensual sex with

a female under the age of 18. Notice the gender roles in this law. I’ve NEVER heard of a female being

prosecuted for this law, ever. Now most people would agree with a statutory rape law because a

significantly older male engaging in sexual relations with a female under the age of 18, both ordinary

people and courts (except some Islamic courts) would say is criminally indictable. However, a vast,

vast majority of the “offenders” this law snags are males in their late teens and early twenties being

prosecuted by a vengeful girlfriend or an angry mom or dad, angry that their daughter is sexually

active with an older man. Some states make exceptions for men in their late teens and early twenties

under this law, however, most do not. So I hope you get the picture, statutory “rape” is mostly

statutory bullshit. Oh and remember since it’s “rape” ALL cases of it are reported and included in

rape crime statistics, so think about that next time you look at any rape statistics. There are probably

hundreds, if not thousands of these vengeful girlfriend/angry mom and dad prosecutions included in

there next to actual forcible, violent, traumatic rape.

In the case of Phoebe Prince, two of the men that eventually harassed her along with a group of

females, Ms. Prince had consensual sex with in the months leading up to her suicide. Both of the

men were 18 years old. So in the aftermath of the suicide, there was a criminal prosecution of the

predominantly female group of harassers of Phoebe Prince and of course, both men in the case were

indicted with statutory rape. I want to make it clear to everyone reading this that I am not in favor of

the men in this case in any way, they are unsavory persons in general, they did harass her, they are

guilty of that. However, to parade them around in the press and have headlines screaming, “RAPE

CHARGES FILED IN PRINCE CASE” when in reality Phoebe Prince was squirming with delight as

an 18-year old penis penetrated her is misleading as all hell and flagrantly ludicrous beyond the point

of writing almost. The charges and press coverage were purely dramatic theatrics designed to get

everyone up in a rape hysteria about the case. Rape hysteria, you know that always leads to positive

things in society and people! I think the prosecution filed for “rape charges” because they wanted to

really punish the male harassers of Ms. Prince and for the attention it would bring in the courtroom

and elsewhere. However, their strategy ultimately failed completely. The “rape charges” were

dropped in a plea deal and ALL of Phoebe Prince’s harassers got no sentence other than probation.

Great job jerks. I’m pretty sure the prosecuting lawyer was an overzealous female attorney too, as if

you couldn’t guess. Honestly, this whole “rape charge” thing and the fact that Ms. Prince slept around

destroyed the case for me. People around the world associate US schools with mass shootings,

when there hasn’t been a mass shooting in a US school in years, yet every year untold numbers are

harassed till they kill themselves and no one gets in any sort of trouble at all. Pardon my language,

but what fucking shit.

One last thing, there was an outrageously preposterous article by a radical (oh wait most/all of them

are radical) feminist linking the stupidly mindless slutwalks with the Phoebe Prince case. How you

ask? She claimed they the males Phoebe Prince was sexually involved with encouraged and ordered

the female suspects in the case to call her a slut and a whore. Sure. I believe that! Considering 9/

10 people I hear using the word slut on a daily basis are women describing other women, sure, it’s

the men telling all of them to say that! Here’s the truth and you can even fucking look this up, the

girls in the case were the main harassers and assaulters of Phoebe Prince and they relentlessly

called her a slut and whore on their own violation. She further added that slut was a term invented by

men to make women police themselves. Yeah, yeah, it’s all a conspiracy. Maybe you should police

yourselves instead of supporting each other when one of you is 100% wrong in a situation. See the

post on here, “Another Abused Man” for more on that.

You are a thought statutory rapist, you bastard!

This next anecdote is a personal one of mine that is still hard for me to admit and talk about what

happened, but it shows just how strong, rigid and insane the rape hysteria/culture/gotcha-rape (ex:

statutory, I don’t like you now so that consensual sex we had is now “rape,” etc.) hysteria is here in

the United States.

In the spring of last year I was seeing a therapist at my university and I was running a humor/satire/

funny-because-it-didn’t-happen-to-you blog, two seemingly unrelated events. The biggest fan of

my blog was a 16-year old Mexican girl, she thought everything I wrote was, in her words, “fucking

hilarious.” So, naturally I mentioned my blog and her to my therapist during one of our final sessions

because it was a positive thing for me. Of the many things I said about my biggest fan I told my

therapist she was attractive and that “I wouldn’t say no to her.” That, right there, tipped off an

argument/firestorm that ultimately destroyed the relationship between my therapist and I which we

had been building the past four months and seriously hurt a lot of the progress we made. You see, to

my therapist (a woman in her late twenties), I had just become an offender by saying that. She turned

on me and we spent the majority of our last two sessions together arguing about what I felt about my

16-year old Mexican fan. My therapist in one corner calling me inappropriate and wrong and blah,

blah, and saying I “need to stop.” Myself in the other corner saying that the fan of mine was a friend

who lived in another country who I would never see (my therapist retorted that I might see her one

day), and me saying she looked good means literally nothing in the scope of things. My therapist said

extremely offensive things to me, like “oh what if she was ten, would it be okay then hmm?” and even

uttered the word “pedophilia” at one point. That fucking killed me. It was a disaster. It cancelled out

the months of sessions we had put in together. I still can’t believe something so minor, caused such a

big cock-up. Ironically enough when I told my biggest fan about all this garbage even SHE hated my

therapist and thought she was an idiot for saying such wildly accusatory, downright insulting things.

What happened eventually? Well contrary to my therapist’s predictions, I still haven’t ever seen

(not even on video) my biggest fan at all, we don’t talk anymore at all, and I don’t even do my blog

anymore. All true.

And now for yet another painful personal anecdote, for those of you who think all this rape hysteria/

culture is a right-wing/conservative thing exclusively. A few years back I was working on an

environmental conversation corps. One of my co-workers was an attractive blonde named Dorrie.

We were interested in each other and started talking. She was 17 years, 8 months old, I was 21. Can

you see where this is going? So I wisely decided to tell my one friend, a huge left wing ideologue,

about how I wanted to hang out with Dorrie. He thought it was all cool and even encouraged me until

I told him how old she was. Keep in mind my friend here is soft as all hell on crime, he rarely gets

mad even at real criminals (he does get quite mad at guns though, even though they are inanimate

objects), and is socially very liberal and anything goes. With that said, here’s how I got him mad at

old “criminal offender” Stownwhal. After I told him Dorrie’s age, he was like my therapist, flipping on

me completely, saying I was wrong and that I was going to be arrested and brought to trial and all

that noise. He said he didn’t want to be dragged in and have to testify at my trial. He wasn’t joking;

this extreme reaction of his was genuine. He ended our conversation by angrily, high-and-mightily

saying, “It’s your life man.” Much like my therapist his insane overreaction was all for naught in

the end. Dorrie and I lost interest in each other, never hung out, and have never talked since that

one season on the conservation corps. Left-wing, right-wing, it doesn’t matter, everyone’s been

brainwashed by ridiculous ideology and everyone suffers as a result. Think, that is all I ask. Look at

things from a different perspective. There’s more than one right answer to most things, remember

that.

Until next time,

Stownwhal Jaxson

All Real Inequity is Faced by Men

2011-06-17T11:51:00.000+01:00

I stumbled across this website the other day. The organization is called PARITY. They are a registered charity, and as you can see their mission is to fight for equal rights for people in the UK. Here is an excerpt from their homepage:

PARITY was first formed in 1986 as the Campaign for Equal State Pension Ages, a wholly voluntary organisation concerned with the equal rights of men and women. It gained charitable status in January 2005

Objects
The Objects of PARITY are those set out in the current PARITY constitution, namely:
- to promote and protect the equal rights of men and women to the enjoyment of all civil, political, economic social and cultural rights under the law;
- to institute proceedings in the UK or appropriate European Courts for the purpose of establishing or protecting any such equal rights.

Registered charity 1107795.

Seems like they mean business, no? They are certainly the real deal. Now take a look at their page for current objectives:

equal liability of men and women over 60 in respect of National Insurance contributions (NICs);
mitigation, and no further aggravation, of the present inequality as between men and women in state pension provision due to the continuing unequal state pension ages (lasting until year 2020);
substantially equal public funding for medical research into and treatment of male and female specific diseases;
funding for research into the reasons for and means of reducing the persistent difference in life expectancy between men and women;
equal status for separated parents and more rigorous enforcement of child contact and of maintenance orders;
equal treatment of victims of domestic violence, both male and female, and their children;
effective Government policies to encourage a more even balance between men and women in primary school teaching;
equal anonymity for defendants and complainants in sex offence cases until conviction;
equal provisions for men and women in all statutory and public policies and benefits.

Notice anything here? Remember that this is a charity that fights for legal parity between the sexes, and that they are inclusive of both genders.

The only REAL cases of sex discrimination that they can find, where one sex has actual, demonstrable legal advantage over the other, ARE THOSE WHERE MEN ARE DISCRIMINATED AGAINST.

This doesn't surprise me, but I bet it will some feminists. Look throughout their site, there are literally two lines dedicated to the 'discrimination' that women 'may' face, and the rest of the place is about the real discrimination of men.

If you do want 'equality', and you live in the UK, then show your support for these people. Make a donation, become a member.

Lion Goodman - Lying Mangina, Radical Feminist?

2011-06-15T10:19:00.000+01:00

Exhibit A:

Lion Goodman - "tough nuts" to false rape victims.

Exhibit B:

Lion Goodman Lyin'

Exhibit C:

His website.

I thought the conscious men were bad.

– AN OPEN APOLOGY TO WOMEN –
from One Man
On behalf of myself, and on behalf of many of my brothers, I want to apologize to you. This apology is for you, specifically, and secondarily for all women. I wish I could speak on behalf of all men, but sadly, most men have not yet awakened to the truth of the damage we have done to women.   My hope is that this apology will lighten the burden you have carried throughout your life. This process is a part of my own healing journey, and I sincerely hope that it supports you in your healing process.
I am sorry. I’m sorry for all of the things I’ve done to hurt you in the past. As I have grown into mature manhood, I have come to realize just how badly I’ve treated you.
I make this apology as a representative of the men in your life – the men who were your father, you brothers, cousins, uncles, grandfathers, relatives, neighbors, friends, boyfriends, lovers, and strangers who have ever done harm to you. I want you to know how sorry I am for the things they did to hurt you. They were wrong to have hurt you.
I am sorry for any abuse you suffered as a young girl, whether that abuse was physical, verbal, emotional, or mental. If your father abused you, I am deeply sorry that he did that. It shouldn’t have happened to you. If your father wasn’t around, I am sorry that he abandoned you (ED: or had you stolen from him and was forced to pay support for you which your mother didn't give to you). He should have been there to support and protect you, to teach you and hold you, and to love you in a good way when you were sad or frightened or hurt. He should have seen your perfect divine spark and loved you for who you are. He should have loved you perfectly – you deserve that – but he wasn’t able to. I’m sorry that he wasn’t able to be the good, supportive and loving father you wanted and deserved.
I am sorry that the boys and I called you names when you were young. We picked on you, hit you, or bullied you. If I had known better at the time, or if I could have been there as the adult I am now, I would have stopped them. I would have shown those boys that respect begins with respecting themselves, and extends to you, and to all beings, for all beings are precious. But I wasn’t able to be there for you, and I am truly sorry that they hurt your feelings, and made you feel ashamed and embarrassed. They were wrong to do so.
I apologize for all the times I stared at you, along with those other adolescent boys and men, looking at your body as if you were an object. We may have looked at you with lust, desire, greed, or aversion, dislike, or judgment. We didn’t see your inner beauty, and I’m truly sorry for that. I am sorry we taunted you about your breasts, and made sexual comments to embarrass you. My brothers and I have objectified you – ignored your nature as a sacred Goddess, and saw you as an object to use instead of a human being to love. I know you have felt this much of your life. From the time you began to shine your light, men have wanted to feed off of you, taking your light and beauty for themselves. We have sinned against you, and I apologize. It was wrong.
You had to protect yourself from these our invasions. You may have slumped your shoulders, trying to hide your beautiful breasts (ED: or displayed them without modesty only to berate men who look) , or built a hard shell around yourself, as most of your sisters did. You may have shut down your essential light, hiding it from the eyes of men. I am so sorry that this happened.   I want to take it away, and start over with these words: You are safe. I cherish you. I will never hurt you, and I will never let anyone else hurt you.
I am sorry for those men and boys who have touched you in ways you didn’t want to be touched, invading your privacy and your body. I am embarrassed knowing that I have done these things. As a young man, I sexualized girls and tried to push them into doing things I wanted them to do – without the slightest awareness of their needs or desires. Like most young men, I was an insensitive blockhead. I hurt many girls I actually wanted to love, and those I wanted to love me (ED:and no women ever hurt men).
I wanted to be friends with you and the other girls. I wanted to learn how to love and be loved, but I was never taught how to do so. I didn’t have a mentor, an older boy or a man who could teach me how to respect and honor you and the other girls. I was so full of my own shame and uncertainty that I couldn’t see anyone else’s needs. I’m sorry I labeled you and judged you. I’m sorry that I didn’t see your light – the beautiful light that you are – worthy of honor and care and protection (ED: You deserve it just because you are a female).   I’m sorry that I was crude, rude, and hurtful. I feel terrible about the things I’ve done, and even more terrible about the things that my brothers did to you. I am truly sorry.
I am sorry for the clumsy way I introduced you to sex and had sex with you repeatedly – even when you didn’t want to (ED: serial rapist?). I apologize for the crude groping and the pushy way I forced myself on you (ED: LOL). I wish I had known what I know now – how precious you are, and how slowly I need to move to ensure your comfort, your pleasure, and your “yes.”   I pushed through many “no’s,” uncaring about your feelings and needs.
My own needs and desire for sex were so strong that they blinded me. They turned me into an insensitive lunatic with only one priority – getting you into bed, and having sex with you. And I’m especially sorry that life’s beautiful gift of sexuality was cheapened and made mundane by my actions, and the actions of the other boys and men. We lost the sacredness of our sensual nature somewhere along the way. Our fathers and uncles never taught us (ED: no, feminists did). Sex became a crude and unconscious attempt to numb our own pain. I am sorry for all those men who clumsily tried to get their own needs met, ignoring your needs, your wants and your desires.
If I knew then what I know now about sexual love, I would have met you gently, gingerly, softly, and carefully. I would have slowly and playfully moved forward one step at a time, waiting for your agreement and assent. I would have waited patiently for your desire to rise, for you to want me. I have learned much in these intervening years, but unfortunately, most of my brothers are still clumsily ripping your clothes off and making their own orgasm and release the only thing of importance, using you to get themselves off instead of sharing love. I am so sorry that your own sacred sex has been abused, and that you have been used by men as an object for their own egotistical drives. I wish I could be there to gently kiss away your pain. I would hold you strongly in my arms, and let you cry out about all the times when you only wanted a little tenderness, a little loving kindness, when you only wanted to be cherished (ED: and about the time that she just wanted a good hard fucking, and you couldn't do it for her). But that man, that adolescent boy in man’s clothing, could not offer anything but his own pushy needs, and once satisfied, he abandoned you.
And I am sorry for abandoning you, and all the times and all the men who have abandoned you, left you with hurt feelings, or confusion, or horror. Sometimes I just didn’t know what to say, or how to say it. And sometimes I didn’t understand my own feelings enough to say anything. I’m sorry you were left alone and confused. You may have even wondered whether you deserved to be left behind. But no – you deserve to be cherished, held, honored, and praised for the great being that you are.
You deserve to be told the truth. You are part of the Goddess, from whom we all come. The Goddess gave birth to the world and to us all. She is the one who knows how to make a human being – each one completely unique in the world. She knew how to make your unique body, your unique spirit, your unique mind. You are part of her precious body, as I am, but I did not know this during most of my life. I apologize for my ignorance, and for the harm I have caused without that knowledge.   I apologize for all those men throughout history who have stripped this knowledge from your sisters, your mothers, your grandmothers, and from all of our ancestors who knew that life is sacred, and that it is our duty to protect and care for it.
You have been designed, biologically and socially, to shine your light, to make yourself beautiful, to be attractive. You want to attract the attention that you deserve – the kind of attention from men that honors and cherishes you. You deserve a man who takes care of you, supports you, and empowers you as a woman. But in this adolescent culture, mostly you attract the attention of boys and men who are frozen in their adolescent state (ED: MAN UP YOU LITTLE BOYS!). Our culture has not educated us to be generous with our love. We want for ourselves. We want to fulfill our own pleasure instead of serving and honoring yours (ED: AH! Like women honor and serve ours). We (ED: again lyin, you do not represent me) are programmed to want a girlfriend or lover or wife as a possession instead of a partner. I am sorry we have been so ignorant, so young, so poisoned by testosterone and by our popular culture.
We are biologically driven to spread our seeds, and you are the biological depository, the factory for our future genes. This “use” of women is built into our bodies and reinforced by magazines, movies, and television. Although we have the capacity to grow up and move past these base desires, most men never mature into wholeness. We can become men of integrity, truth, goodness and beauty. It is possible. My friends and I are hard at work learning to become real men – men of presence, passion, purpose and power (ED: conscious men?). Not power over others – that’s the old story – but sharing power with our women partners for the benefit of all living things, for a future that works for everyone.
You are my sister, my daughter, my mother, my cousin, my wife, my niece, my aunt, my grandmother, my partner, my lover. You have given the best of your energy and your life to nurture life, to bear and raise children, and to support the men in your life (ED: HA! WHO, WHEN, HOW?). And you have borne the brunt of our crass and greedy culture that values things instead of people.   Throughout history, men have stripped you of your connection to the Goddess, your heritage as leaders and carriers of cultural wisdom. We have taken away your right to your pleasure and choice, and placed the shackles of religious morality on you, making you ashamed of your own sexual power and love. I am sorry for this. I apologize deeply. My heart is breaking for you, and I wish I could right the wrongs of the past 5,000 years. (ED: fuck you, you lying feminist cunt)
I ask only that you hear this apology in the deepest part of your heart, and to know that it is sincere. In my personal life, I have already begun to make amends to the women I have hurt in my life. I can only hope that the men in your life will come to this same understanding of our collective culpability and responsibility, and to begin to make it right. It is my hope that they find their own remorse, recognize what we have done to you, beg for forgiveness, and get to work making amends and making a new life. It is what you deserve. It is what is needed to heal the past.
And then, if you can find it in your heart to forgive us (and I know that it may take time), I invite you to become a full partner – equal in stature and equal in contribution. I ask that you free yourself and speak your truth and come into your own power. I ask that you band together as women and take hold of the wheels of power in this culture. We need your wisdom and your strength, your beauty and your clarity. We need what you value at the forefront of our civilization. We need you to lead the way, not walk behind us (ED: with Lion safely attached to your chain). We are ignorant men who believe we are superior. It is the height of pride, hubris, and folly. Without you at our sides, we are nothing, and life has no meaning.
As men, we have much to learn from you as women. And women have much to learn from us as men. We can heal the past, heal ourselves, and heal together. Many wrongs have been committed throughout history. May we awaken to the wrongs we have done – both those we have participated in and those we have let happen. May this apology be the first of many, and may it result in deep healing.
As co-equal partners, we can create a new world.
There isn’t a moment to lose.
Will you take my hand?
With love and hope in my heart,
One Good Man

Exhibit D:

An article he wrote for a website called Women Waking the World

During the past five decades, since the earliest years of the Feminist movement, there has been an increasing awareness and interest in the Divine Feminine. This website is just one example of active exploration into all aspects of the feminine, including the Goddess, and how she appears in all of her forms and guises.
But what of the Divine Masculine?
After 5,000 years of masculine domination and control, patriarchy and imperialism, the Masculine looks like a problem to be solved rather than a subject to study or an energetic force to embody.

Do you really think this man is serving men's interests?

I don't.

Lion Goodman - "Tough Nuts" to false rape victims

2011-06-14T12:43:00.001+01:00

I got a response from Lion Goodman about my previous article and I just had to re-post this here...

I notice that I'm the first to comment. This may mean that your audience is so small that you're a lone voice in the wind, whining about not being heard, when in fact, there's no one listening. Or maybe your minions will come to defend your vitriol after I respond. I have no problem being attacked by you, or being called a feminist. I am, if anything, an equalist. Equal treatment for both men and women. No advantage to either one. We should be all equal under the law.

I understand that you've been hurt by feminism, you poor thing. Well, tough nuts. Stand up for something constructive. Do something constructive. Say something constructive. Go out and heal something, starting with yourself. Instead of whining like a little boy "Those bad feminists hurt me! Whaaah!"

When will you take responsibility for your own life and do something creative instead of being a reactionary whiner? I'm giving voice to more than 90 people who have something constructive to say, who have studied themselves and society through the sciences, psychology, spirituality, sociology, gender issues, politics, and the principles of success - of making something of yourself. What are you doing other than complaining and protesting all those bad people who hurt you? You can call me a lying feminist cunt all you want. It's like pissing into the wind. It just flies back into your face. As soon as you have something constructive to say, that actually adds to the conversation, you'll have my ear and my interest. So far, all you've gotten is my disdain.

Want to stay angry and pissy? Good. Enjoy yourself. Contact me when you get over yourself and can offer the intelligence (which I'm sure you have) to the betterment of the situation.

Lion Goodman

My response?

LOL and you talk of diatribe. Thank you for your (non)response/rant.

I'll let you in on a little secret now Lion. Fighting feminism is doing something constructive. Standing against misandry, like that spewed by the 'men' and women at your summit, is the most constructive thing I can do right now (seeing as I have no job or career anymore, thanks to feminism).

Trying to call me a little boy and a whiner won't stop me. Your self righteous indignation about doing something constructive is one of the most naive and hypocritical things I have ever heard. The sick rape and domestic violence laws need to be changed, (but you have no idea about them, do you? having ONLY JUST heard of the MRM)it's a massive shame that more people don't put their time into doing something THAT positive, instead of putting man hating feminists on a global platform to hurt men even more.

You had my disdain, and that of many others as you well know, the second you announced the summit and its feminist lineup. You clearly have no interest in conversation as you came here simply to try and insult me rather than answer any questions. I guess that's what you do when you can't censor dissenting opinion eh?

You liar.

This comment tells you everything you need to know about Lion Goodman. If you oppose feminism you are a 'reactionary whiner', or an 'angry and pissy' 'little boy'. I guess all victims of false rape accusations should just STFU and stop whinging, eh Lion? Their fault, eh Lion? So much for being 'inclusive'. I'm sure all the readers over at false rape society (you remember the guys that you didn't invite to talk at your shindig) will be thrilled to hear your attitude towards them. I bet Vladek Filler is going to send you a friend request on facebook after he has listened to your summit and 'learned' something.

Does that count as doing something constructive?

Masculist Manifesto

2011-06-14T12:41:00.000+01:00

I read this excellent post on In Mala Fide written by Human Stupidity. It covers the same ideas I have been having in a much more eloquent and comprehensive way. Here is on excerpt called A Radical Masculist Manifesto:

Paternity fraud and birth control lies should be felonies. Hard to prove? Invert the burden of proof: “Men never lie about birth control.”
Drinking, smoking, and overeating during pregnancy should be felony reckless endangerment of a fetus.
Gender quotas in prison are urgently needed to get 51% female prisoners. We recommend stricter punishment for female felons and special mercy for male criminals. Gender is socially constructed: if there are 7 times more men in jail then women, then this clear gender discrimination needs to be remedied.
Domestic violence against men is 98% underreported (Tiger Woods, Bill Clinton): “Has a women ever slapped you, shoved you, or thrown an object at you?”
Raise men’s awareness of rape: “Have you ever said ‘Stop, I’m tired,’ or ‘Not now’ and the woman did not stop that exact second?” Then you are a rape victim! 3 out of 5 men have been raped and are not even aware that they were victims of a crime.
An infant cannot consent to eating unhealthy food. Feeding health-damaging food to an overweight non-consenting infant thus is felony “child poisoning.”
Sexual innuendo, bantering should be protected free speech.
Disdainful female rejections and typical put-downs (“loser”, “nerd”, “small dick”) create a hostile work environment and are harassment.
Freedom to buy and sell sexual services should be a universal human right.
Like priests and psychologists, prostitutes should have the professional duty to keep their clients secret. Spilling the beans about infidelity destroys families and thus is bad for the children. The press should be held to the same secrecy standards, as was custome during John F. Kennedy’s tenure and still is in France.
Find an equally offensive motto equivalent to the feminist war cry: “all men are rapists.” “All women are gold diggers” is not good enough because gold digging is not a felony. Maybe “all women are bank robbers”. Just re-define “bank robbery” like feminists re-defined “rape”, “consent”, “child”, and “pedophilia.”

A must read article and writer.

I am a Masculist

2011-06-13T21:47:00.000+01:00

I have been asking myself these very questions for a while now, so it was strange to see them come up in the stats.

What is the opposite of feminism? Is there an opposite?

If there is, then I’d be willing to bet that I’m about as close as you could find. You could call me an anti-feminist, and be correct – I do indeed oppose feminism. You could also call me a Men’s Rights Activist, because I am being active about men’s rights. You could call me a PUA, because I ‘pick up’ women.

In my mind, however, I am not an MRA. I am not a PUA. I am not any kind of Greek letter. I stand for men, for the greatness of masculinity. That which is divine, which created the world, civilization. I am a Masculist.

I say this because I think that in a lot of ways I think I'm scarily like a feminist. Like feminists I can resort to profanity or shaming language. Like feminists I can even seem harsh. Like feminists I won’t deviate from my ideology. Like feminists I think that my gender should not be dominated. Like feminists I place much blame on one specific group. Like feminists I see my group as being victimized. Like feminists I don't believe in equality.

Unlike feminists I don’t need to parade around in my underwear to get attention. Unlike feminists, I don’t advocate the wrongful imprisonment of people. Unlike feminists, I don’t advocate murder. Unlike feminists, I don’t try to make my group unaccountable for crimes. Unlike feminists, I take into account the interests of people other than myself or my gender. Unlike feminists, I actually have reality on my side and can back up my ideology with REAL facts.

Like this FACT:

Men are better than women at just about everything.

I don’t need bogus statistics to prove that one! Thus it seems to qualify any claim I make about male superiority heretofore. That’s the thing, and as much as you feminist folk don’t want to hear it, it won’t change. You must at some point sit down and face the cold hard facts. The truth can be painful when the sun comes up and it is the only thing left, I know. I had to face the fact that feminism is so large and pervasive that I might have had to spend many years in prison for a false accusation of the false crime of marital rape.

Another FACT:

It is not in men’s nature to harm women or children.

The opposite is true. In fact, men instinctively cannot do enough for women. Look how far we let your silly emotional tantrum called feminism go on for. The extent of feminism’s reach is the perfect example of chivalry. If fact one wasn’t reason enough for a totally patriarchal society (but a real one this time, not the strawman feminist patriarchy), then fact two should be.

It is time to get serious children. Think of me not as a person, but as a weapon. Perhaps a crude weapon, but as a knife that is well crafted and sharp may help you to cut cleanly, one with a rough edge always gets more purchase. This is a gender war, and you feminists started it. We are going to end it. The Evil Penis is a tool of masculism, and it is going to fuck you into submission.

And I forgot the lube :).

Another Message to Lion Goodman

2011-06-13T14:42:00.000+01:00

I left a comment on the following article at AVfM called A Message to Lion Goodman. The article left me so angry I had to go for a sit down. Here is the comment from Mr Goodman:

I’m the one who invited Paul to be on the Summit, and I’ll be interviewing him. I’ve read all or your comments, and I have a few of my own in response. First, the reason Paul is on at 10 am is because we had very few slots left when I contacted him. There’s no reason to “bury” his talk any more than the other 50 people who are speaking during the work day. Most people will be listening to the recordings, not the live calls anyway. Paul’s interview will be available to everyone, free, for months, just like all the others.
Second: I resent being called a mangina, or any of the other epithets you’ve used to demean me, or anyone else in our Summit. We are providing a comprehensive look at men’s issues – all of them – at our own cost, for free. Without trying to sell anything or promote any particular point of view. Here we are, working on behalf of all men, providing deep and significant conversations from a wide range of points of view, to educate men and free them from social programming – and some of you accuse us of having an evil feminist agenda. It’s shocking to me – there’s all this value offered for free, and your own anger prevents you from seeing what’s available.
Third, I invited Paul into the program because I believe the Men’s Rights movement has a very important point of view that needs to be represented. The truth is, I wasn’t aware of the movement until recently, but as soon as I discovered it, I knew it had to be included, and Paul was the most obvious spokesperson. There is no hidden agenda, no bad intent, and no need to demean Paul or MRA movement. I expect to have a clean and open conversation with Paul, and honor his point of view in the same way I’ve honored each speakers’ point of view. This is a way to expand Paul’s audience, to bring more people into the realization that men have been oppressed as much as women. Why accuse and demean our intention in advance? Why not listen to some of the programming with an open mind and learn something?
I request an open-minded approach to what we’re trying to do. We’re doing the best we can to expand the conversation about ALL of the issues that effect men, from the sociopolitical to the personal. Join us in that dialog, without diatribe.

Firstly, "we had very few slots left when I contacted him", why is this? You want to discuss men's issues then the most notorious MRA is one of the last people you cantact? That makes no sense at all.

Next, " I resent being called a mangina, or any of the other epithets you’ve used to demean me, or anyone else in our Summit", now if this is offensive then try being called a misogynist for simply defending YOUR INNOCENCE. If you are going to defend Michael Kimmel then YOU ARE A FUCKING MANGINA.

"We are providing a comprehensive look at men’s issues" Really? Comprehensive you say? Where are all of the radical masculists? Where are all of the false rape victims to share their 'issues'? (not an issue for you?)

"Here we are, working on behalf of all men, providing deep and significant conversations from a wide range of points of view" Enter Paul Elam, your very own 'loony from the fringe'. Or at least that is what your pal Michael likes to call him. This is the extent of your 'range'. The 'range' of conversation you clearly claim to represent falls VERY far short of what I would call even or fair. Paul Elam does not represent the fringes of anything. Paul Elam is an 'equality' chaser (whatever that means to you), just like you presumably. If you want to ACTUALLY have representation of ALL men's issues then why not invite me to speak? Or the guys from Manhood Academy? You have attempted to hijack the discourse and present it as being comprehensive... FROM A FEMINIST VIEWPOINT. You do not work on behalf of me, one iota.

"to educate men and free them from social programming – and some of you accuse us of having an evil feminist agenda" When you say 'free them from social programming' it is strange but you sound remarkably like a feminist. Do you think gender is a social construct? If you do not have a feminist agenda then...
1. Why are there feminists there? Kimmel, Ardagh
2. Why do you recognize feminist myths as fact? '5,000 years of domination'?
3. Why do you use feminist terminology? Oppression etc.

"The truth is, I wasn’t aware of the movement until recently, but as soon as I discovered it, I knew it had to be included, and Paul was the most obvious spokesperson"
I am part of the MRM, and Paul Elam is NOT A SPOKESPERSON FOR ME. How the hell can you claim to have all of the viewpoints of AN ENTIRE MOVEMENT just by interviewing one single person WHOSE VIEWS ARE VERY DIFFERENT TO MINE AND MANY OTHER PEOPLE'S. How the hell can you claim to have any interest in men's issues whatsoever, when you haven't until recently heard about THE MEN'S RIGHTS MOVEMENT, I think they are men, and I think they have issues, where have you been?

"the realization that men have been oppressed as much as women" And you claim to not be a feminist? NEWSFLASH DIMMO>>>

Protection and provision does not equate to oppression.

If you think that men, as a group, have oppressed women as a group then I'm sorry to let you in on this but...
YOU ARE A FEMINIST!

DO NOT EVEN DARE TO CLAIM THAT YOU REPRESENT ALL MEN OR EVEN THAT YOU ARE TRYING TO COVER ALL OF THE ISSUES THAT MEN FACE.

YOU LYING FEMINIST CUNT.

Are You a Feminist? Really?

2011-06-13T12:10:00.000+01:00

After my short discussion with Morgan (in the comments here and here) I realize that most women who use the term feminist don't actually know what feminism even is.

Here is a short post and video from objectify chicks to educate you somewhat:

You are delusional or stupid or dishonest if you maintain that feminism is about:

1) Equality.
2) The protection of women.
3) Proper care for children.
4) A stronger, more vibrant society.

Rather, feminism is about:

1) Socialism.
2) The destruction of marriage.
3) The wholesale slaughter of children.
4) The hatred of men.
5) Covetousness.
6) Placing women, children, men, and all of society at risk.

Read the quotes below. Enjoy.

Real Domestic Violence

2011-06-12T10:24:00.000+01:00

Another excellent post from our very special guest writer Capt. Dr. Stownwhal Jaxson. It's really great to see others wanting to share their experiences. Please note this post is related to the previous post, “Another Abused Man.” Reading that previous post would help one better understand this one, but overall it’s not necessary to read one to get the message of the other...

Sara, the young English girl whom I communicated with for months, who became dangerously
obsessed with me, and ultimately hell bent on harming me, shaming me, guilting me, and making me
look bad, had some pretty poor parents (if you can call them that, keep reading and you will see why).
Although that doesn’t excuse her cruel intentioned behavior, it does help explain it a little. As I’ve said
previously, Sara represents the worst kind of offender, one who refuses to change in the slightest,
one who is remorseless, one who goes to extreme (and very low down) lengths to achieve their aims,
one who rallies the support of uninvolved others through lies to attack innocent people, etc. and so
obviously no one factor is ever responsible for the creation of such a person, nor is any one factor an
explanation to their wild, erratic, hard to forgive behavior. Anyway on with the story.

Sara’s step-dad was a domestic abuser. From all she told me about him, his behavior, his habits, and
taking into account her honesty level, motivation to lie, and her reactions to what I had to say about
him, I have formed the opinion that her step-dad was indeed a domestic abuser and was not among
the untold numbers of men falsely accused of domestic abuse.

Now before feminists, alarmists, and manginas alike reading this shout, “Aha, see what an evil
man!” Let me explain him to you first. Firstly, unlike the portrayals of domestic abusers in the media
(such as in the movie, Enough) this man was not white-collar or educated or sober and he was not
your typical everyday man. Instead he was blue collar, uneducated, an avid illegal drug user, and
obsessed with physical hand-to-hand combat. He would hit and has hit Sara’s “mom” (I’ll get to why
mom is in quotes in a minute) on several occasions when his anger would take over, which according
to Sara, was quite frequently. At the time I was talking to Sara, her step-dad still would get angry
often, but would force himself to leave the house so he wouldn’t hit the “mom” yet again. He probably
went off and smoked hashish, which he did despite Sara’s pleas to stop. Like any “good parent” he
ignored her and went on his way. Pardon me if this offends (sarcasm), but a parent should not be
doing drugs and especially someone as volatile as Sara’s stepdad here, should not be taking mind
altering substances. A mature, responsible parent/person would recognize this, but not old step dad
here or the “mother.” Additionally he also verbally abused and demeaned Sara and her siblings. For
his behavior I called this man, Mr. Moat, after the British bully, criminal, and murderer Raoul Moat. Mr.
Moat was obsessed with physical combat too, constantly working out, constantly practicing martial
arts, and from what Sara told me he was a Black Belt and champion fighter, however, judging by
his behavior it seems to have gone to his head. Being a former student of the martial arts myself,
I was taught (as all students of this art form are) that you do not misuse your skills or bully or pick
fights. Apparently, Mr. Moat missed that lesson. He also missed the lesson where they say, don’t take
steroids, because he did that too. “Only once,” Sara told me defiantly. Sure, I believe that (sarcasm),
I believe a man with control problems; can take a drug that furthers his obsession with physical
combat and working out, “only once.” Mr. Moat’s steroid use is an incredibly significant fact, here is
a substance known for making people violent and aggressive in a phenomenon called, “roid rage.” I
think this shows it wasn’t Mr. Moat’s maleness that made him the way he was, but his own, defective
personality and his own personal habits. Mr. Moat was a domestic abuser and a dangerous person,
I’d say the same thing if he were a woman. Oh wait, read on.

The Mom did it too
Yes, you read that correctly, there is more to this domestic abuse story as Sara’s mother (if you can
call someone who blatantly, unashamedly, and publicly states she would rather be partying, raving,
and “off her head” than taking care of her own children, a mother, than yes she was a mother) also
was a domestic abuser. A little background on this woman, she many times abandoned her own
children when they were young to go party, rave, and “go off her head” (a term for ingesting an
unsafe, illegal mind altering substance). She openly admits two of her three children (including Sara)
were “accidents.” She frequently reminisces of her party days, longing to return to them, wishing she
wasn’t “burdened” with motherhood. Nauseating enough? I personally found Sara’s “mom” to be so
repulsive, so despicable, and such a low down person, as most decent people would. Her attitude on
things was just mind boggling to me and probably to anyone who believes in responsibility, honor,
duty, decency, etc. Her domestic abuse was, like Mr. Moat’s, mostly demeaning and degrading
comments (psychological warfare in other words) aimed at Sara and her siblings (two brothers,
might I add). However, from time to time, she would also “lose it” and hit Sara. While it was rare, it
did happen. This is all I was told about by Sara, there may be more (make that probably). I think a
testament to how horrid of an environment the Mr. Moat/”Mom” combination made Sara’s household,
is how her 7/8 year old brother had a foul mouth like a sailor. There’s a good sign! Rest assured
dear reader; Sara’s “mom” was just as guilty of abuse and neglect as old Mr. Moat was. People often
gloss over female perpetrated domestic violence, when it’s just as prevalent and has just as real
consequences as male perpetrated domestic violence. Sara’s “mom” persists in my mind as someone
who represents the “worst” of people and the absolute epitome of the “bad parent.” I just can’t get
over how some people act.

Sara defended Him
The huge irony in all this is that for all the pain, whining, moaning, complaining, and crying from
Sara over Mr. Moat (and mum), she consistently, ardently defended him in nearly every single
conversation we ever had about him. Read that again feminists, she defended his domestic violence.
She was always telling me what a “nice guy” Mr. Moat was and all the nice things he did like buying them ice cream when he wasn’t flipping out and such. She’d also tell me that her “mother” was a
psychic and could heal people. Whatever. Sara defended domestic violence, end of story. She would
defend Mr. Moat to the point of outrage and say I was judgmental, hyper critical, and an asshole
for ragging on Mr. Moat and her “mom” for their reprehensible behavior. I understand the natural
inclination to defend one’s own parents (“parents” in this case), but she would always be talking
of running away (to nowhere in particular) and how they mistreated her, it seemed the only time
she would speak kind of them is when I expressed disgust over their criminally indictable behavior.
Utter garbage. Then again, the whole situation was incredible lunacy. Women defending domestic
violence, don’t think it happens? Think again, read this paragraph over.

I’m a bad guy, because I’m against violence
In the last letter I ever wrote Sara on April 6th of this year, I merely asked that she recognize and
remember all the effort I put out on her, all the time I spent, all the things I put off, all the care,
the pink scarf I got her for Christmas (regretting that a lot now), etc. I didn’t make any argument
against her behavior because I knew it was futile, I didn’t insult or name call or anything. In return
she sent me a very nasty, spiteful message calling me a liar, a cheat, disgusting, a loner, bound to
end up alone, and insinuated I was a pervert because I “liked teens” (which conveniently enough
is completely unfounded and the only teen I’ve touched in the past 6 years was a 19-year old girl I
had an affair with when I was also 19). She also called me extremely judgmental because I had the
audacity to call out the bad (understatement) behavior of her “parents,” of her friends who harassed
me even though they knew nothing about me, and of her guy friend and cousin who threatened to
physically assault me to the point of injury and accused me of being a misogynist. She said of her
step-dad’s domestic abuse, “you made fun of my step-dad, just because of the domestic violence
issue.” You hear that everyone? Just because of that. Just that. It’s a woman saying this remember
now. Domestic abuse, it’s just that. I don’t know what else to say.

The final bit of tragic irony to this story is that Mr. Moat and old “mom” are guilty of domestic violence,
but likely will never be held accountable for their actions, arrested, or sentenced in a criminal court. And yet, each year, untold numbers of completely innocent men are booked, sentenced, and punished for domestic violence they never even did. Such is the way things are, but they don’t need to stay that way. Keep the faith, keep the fight.

Capt. Dr. Stownwhal Jaxson

Feminism is Futile

2011-06-08T11:10:00.000+01:00

Go on all of the slutwalks you want, organize as many mangina summits as you want. Destroy innocent, decent men even further with your feminist laws. There is one thing that you must realize, and whether you realize it now or in ten years, it was always true and ALWAYS WILL BE. Some things will never change. Ever. Funnily enough these things are the things that feminists and their mangina friends want to stop the most...

Men are at the top of society. They always have been and always will be. Get used to this idea. Why do you think men got to run the world in the first place? Apart from the fact that THEY FUCKING BUILT IT, which is in itself good enough reason. Do you think that these elite men are just going to suddenly say 'ah ok, this is unfair that we have power, you women take some'?

Men are built to strive for dominance, this is instinct not choice. Even if this wasn't the case, women are built to react to dominance (again instinctively), meaning men would strive for dominance to secure mates because they would be able to see that it was what women wanted.

The world IS one big competition. The most capable competitor always wins a competition in the long run. Men are more capable and more driven to compete, THEY ALWAYS WILL BE.

Men want to have sex with women. There are many reasons for this, some silly sluts with a megaphone and some lingerie aren't going to change it. It is biologically built into men to react to fertile women. You idiots. The 'objectifying gaze' isn't something that you can stop, nor is it even bad. The human race needs to procreate, and mother nature has made it so that men feel attracted to women, attempt to mate with women, then get accepted or rejected by the woman, in order for this to happen.

A very simple yet effective method. You think telling the world how histrionic you are and how little your minds can apply logic by ranting about how you 'should' be allowed to do ANYTHING you want without facing the same accountability as men will change that? You fucking idiots.

Do you not think you have done enough damage?

You are banging your head against a brick wall, and getting blood over everyone else in the playground.

Just stop trying and we'll all feel better.

Ultimate Feminist Summit

2011-06-08T09:55:00.000+01:00

http://ultimatemenssummit.com/

Is this some kind of joke?

Why the Hell are Michael Kimmell and the conscious (wo)men invited to anything to do with men?

Check out this statement (emphasis mine):

We are living through one of history’s great transitions - a major shift in social and cultural consciousness where institutions and structures of the past have been turned on their heads.
The 5,500-year history of domination and control is coming to an end, and it’s clear we need a new model to replace it. Men seem to be caught between these two worlds: the old culture for which we’ve been trained, and the emerging culture we have yet to be prepared for. The truth is that even while men often wielded more power in the last era, it was often a harsh, isolating and punishing world for us. The opportunity is now before us to create something far more life-affirming, free and alive.
So how do men fit into and lead in this brave, new uncertain world? How do we live a life of purposeful fulfillment, and make the greatest impact possible? And how do we relate to women and to rising feminine leadership and wisdom?
Our answer is to bring together as many men as possible into deep conversation with experts and each other to engage in this emerging model of 21st Century Masculinity, which builds upon the masculine virtues of the past to create a higher synthesis. These leaders will come together in the largest virtual global gathering for men - all for free - with the Ultimate Men’s Summit.
Join us and you’ll learn from top transformational leaders such as Robert Bly, Sam Keen, Herb Goldberg, Neale Donald Walsch, Dan Millman, Jack Canfield, Andrew Harvey, and more than 65 other luminaries. The Ultimate Men’s Summit is hosted by the Founder of The Shift Network, Stephen Dinan, and by Lion Goodman, Shift’s Director of Men’s Programs.
Our goal with the Ultimate Men’s Summit is to empower each one of you to take a stand for what we are co-creating together. We must help our culture re-balance itself, clear outdated stories and create a more harmonious relationship with the earth and with one other.

We respect your privacy. Your information will never be sold nor shared without your permission.
As we each free ourselves, we can create a life of joy and service to humanity. But we must grow ourselves first, heal the damage of the past, then reach out and serve others. We are all in this together, and we need to support our brothers, and the young men that are growing up in this emerging world.
So, join us - just enter your name and email in the box to the right, and you’ll gain access to every session of the Ultimate Men’s Summit.

In other words,
How to twist men into accepting the feminist agenda.

. FUCK YOU!

Feminism Causes Domestic Violence

2011-06-06T23:37:00.000+01:00

After considering the previous article a little more, and reading Scarecrow's comment, it occurred to me that if, as Feminists have us believe, all domestic violence is about power and control, then feminism IS the root cause of it all.

In this modern feminist world men have no power. That is the problem. Backed into a corner like a hungry wolf by anti-male laws, a man can be dangerous. Every man knows (or should know) that if they hit their woman they will lose their house, job, freedom, children and money. The last thing you want to do at that point is attack him. Attack him, however, is exactly what feminism teaches women to do. Feminism, in fact, has empowered women to be able to do this with complete impunity. The fact that women only make up 5% of convictions yet cause half of all domestic violence is testament to this. 'You can do anything you want'! Begging for mercy is not the same as trying to be a tyrant. Yet women are told that they should NEVER let a man tell them what to do, and that they should be punished for ever trying to. Look on any feminist website and they will all say 'control is abuse'. Women are constantly given this message. If men don't do what women want it is ok to call them misogynists. Female violence against men is encouraged and celebrated.

Ironically, and tragically, women only choose in men those worthy of their admiration... someone who is capable of being a leader. All of the things women look for in a man are indicators of dominance. This means that because of this social pressure to not submit to men in any way, a conflict for power is always going to develop. Why choose someone who is dominant then try to dominate them?

See, before feminism there was no fight for power between the sexes. Men and women had their places and worked together to uphold their family values. All of this violence to establish or defend power was completely unnecessary.

More Violent Feminists

2011-06-06T12:31:00.000+01:00

Article from Daily Mail:

ManKind chairman Mark Brooks said the increase in the number of women being convicted of domestic violence was due to a combination of three factors.

‘More men are coming forward, the police are taking a more balanced approach to domestic abuse and, unfortunately, there has been an increase in the number of violent women in our society,’ he said.

‘All domestic abuse is about power and control and with both female and male perpetrators the abuser wants to totally control their partner.

‘We need the Government to invest in more services targeted specifically at men rather than just sweeping this issue under the carpet.’

In fact, official figures show that the number of women convicted of perpetrating domestic abuse has quadrupled in the past six years, from 806 in 2004-2005 to 3,494 in 2009-2010.

And although women are twice as likely to be victims of domestic abuse, men are much less likely to come forward.
Embarrassed: Men are unlikely to report domestic violence against them because they feel ashamed

Embarrassed: Men are usually unlikely to report domestic violence against them because they feel ashamed

Twice as many male victims (41 per cent) as women (19 per cent) do not tell anyone about the domestic abuse they are suffering, according to the British Crime Survey.

The CPS and ManKind figures also show that the number of men convicted of domestic violence rose in the same time period.

More than 55,000 men were prosecuted in 2010, compared with around 28,700 five years earlier.

A CPS spokesman said the service does support male victims of domestic violence.

He added: ‘There is no bias or lack of concern on the part of the CPS when dealing with cases involving male victims.’

The figures will add to a growing body of evidence that women are becoming more violent.

In 2009, official figures revealed that the number of women found guilty of murder, vicious assault and other attacks had risen by 81 per cent since 1998.

Since we have known that feminism makes women more violent for a long time, the real issue is why the hell is the total number so low compared to men?

Some good comments on the article too.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1394711/More-women-convicted-battering-men-domestic-violence-soars-years.html#ixzz1OUfDK1a0

Another Abused Man

2011-05-30T12:05:00.000+01:00

A young man named Stownwhal Jaxson wrote this. A reminder that abusive women can abuse you even if they have never met you.

INTRO

If you saw her walking down the street, you’d never guess in a million years her true nature. At 4’11 with pale snow white skin, sunshine blonde hair, and a cute little voice, she seems harmless. Seems being the keyword there. For the purpose of this story we’ll call her Sara. From 10/27/10 to 4/6/11 I spent hundreds upon hundreds of hours talking to Sara, thousands of emails, hundreds of texts, countless hours on Skype video chat, just an enormous amount of time overall. More time then I spent on almost any other single thing in my entire life. Yet I received no compensation in any way, shape, or form for all the time and effort I poured into Sara (I’m still not okay with myself/the situation for so much effort leading to nothing). She lives in England, I live in the US, we might as well have been in different universes. Despite that, at different points over those months we talked and on multiple occasions she said I was her everything, her reason for living, that I did more for her than anyone else ever had, that I had saved her life, and that I was the best thing in her life. So how did I then did I find myself on 4/6/11 writing a final tell-off email to her after yet another round of her insanely erratic behavior and incredibly malicious abuse? How is it that if you talked to her now she’d tell you that wire-to-wire I was a terrible, evil asshole who did nothing but make her suffer? How did it all come to be?

Well, it all started when I met Sara on a website for people with depression, because I myself have had major depression for almost a decade. Initially she struck me as an uncaring person (an ultimately correct first impression). I’d write her an email describing my problems, about my life, etc. and she’d write back talking about her problems, but not even saying one word on mine. A day or two after we started talking she was having a “breakdown” and I tried to comfort her. I’m a physically affectionate person, so that is one of the ways I’d told her I’d comfort her. Now, I had no idea of this at the time, but that made her almost instantly become super unhealthily obsessed with me. We spent like 6 hours talking that first day. I put off everything (as I would countless times) to talk to her. Not good. Not good at all. This was the sowing of the seeds of destruction.

MISSED EARLY WARNING SIGNS

Looking back there were some huge warning signs early on that Sara was obsessive, mentally ill to the point where she should be committed, malevolent beyond rationality, and ultimately destructive to herself and others. I didn’t take them seriously enough, but then again neither did her friends, parents, teachers, relatives or even she.

--Begging to come back. Early on, in the beginning of November 2010, we had an argument and she suggested we not speak for a week. I was resistant at first, but then accepted it. Literally within an hour, she was contacting me through multiple mediums literally begging me to talk to her again, saying she wouldn’t last a week (the first of literally hundreds suicide threats from her). I overlooked this, not seeing that she was becoming dangerously obsessed with me. After all, most people aren’t completely, totally psychotic as I later found out Sara is. (That’s not an official clinical impression or diagnosis, that’s my impression from her utter remorselessness, inability to know that she is doing wrong, extreme mood swings, mile wide cruelty streak, and persistence to the point of it ludicrousness).

--Wanting a baby. Literally, no exaggeration, within less than 48 hours of Sara and I having our first conversation she said she would like to have a child with me someday. Think about that. She knew so little about me at this point, it’s comical, I could have been anyone at that point, she knew just about nothing about me! This stunned me when I heard her say this, I thought she couldn’t have meant it, no sane girl would. I know now that it was a huge sign that she was desperate, needy, and dangerously (I mean that literally) clingy.

--Her friend warned me. Sometime in December of 2010, her friend Liz, Sara, and I were arguing about something. Liz told me in a Facebook message that Sara had many times cried suicide for attention and did such things as threaten suicide for attention. She also told me Sara intentionally non-fatally overdosed on webcam in front of her last boyfriend and then didn’t talk to him for 3 days to make it appear as if she had killed herself. I didn’t take this information seriously enough, little did I know in the not-too-distant future Sara would be once again faking suicide only this time to me. I didn’t think someone would go that low. There’s a first time for everything, however.

--She thought we were in a relationship. This is a huge one cause it sets up her whole absurd mentality. She thought we were in a relationship from day one. As crazy as that sounds and despite an ocean and thousands of miles separating us, she thought we were in a relationship. All her actions were based off this “fact,” she’d get super upset and threaten suicide when I’d mention other women in any way, she’d get upset when I told her we weren’t in a relationship at all, she’d get upset when things didn’t go her way for one split second. She was one of those types. The worst part is, her friends supported her lunacy and believed we were in a relationship too! What insanity! In a world of insane people, what do you do? To this day, Sara still believes we were in a relationship. Ponder that for second.

I should have bailed on Sara early on; instead I got too deeply involved and fed her flames. Some people can’t be saved or helped. This eventually led to massive loss of time (spent talking to her and not on other far more important things), money (on phone bills from international texting), and sanity/strength. I expended so much energy on helping someone who couldn’t be helped, didn’t appreciate it, and was abusive and spiteful at the end of the day, it literally sucked the fucking life out of me at times, it’s hard to even write and admit all this, but it’s true. Every word.

BAD THINGS HAPPEN TO GOOD PEOPLE

In the time I talked to Sara she did some of the lowest things I’ve ever seen anyone do ever. I studied criminology for 4 years, interned at a police department, visited a prison, and have read case after case of criminal and civil trials, even with all that, Sara still ranks as doing some of the most low down, desperate, and bat shit crazy things I’ve ever seen anyone do. There was no bar low enough for her, it never ceased to stun me just how far she’d go to try to force me to bend to her will or make me feel bad.

--Rally the troops. Sara intentionally got at least 4 people (her friends and relatives) to either threaten, harass, pressure, guilt, or shame me on numerous occasions. They also, all wrote untrue and slanderous comments about me online, such as that I liked picking on women. Sara, her cousin, and a guy friend of hers threatened to physically assault me to the point of serious injury, if they ever got close enough. Sara’s female friends supported her insanity 100%. They’d harass me with messages saying, “Stop being horrible to Sara,” “Stop torturing Sara,” “Care about Sara more,” “Sara just attempted suicide because of you,” and the lowest, “Sara just killed herself, ya know that right?” Of course there was no “torture,” there was no suicide, no was no “attempt,” and I obviously cared enough to waste a ton of my time talking to Sara, so all of what they said was false, bullshit, and just a malicious effort, inspired by Sara to get at me, to hurt me, to make me do what she wanted. My independent thoughts and actions contrary to what Sara wanted, that was the “torture” they were speaking of. My efforts to try to get her to improve her life, that was also “torture.” Oh and let’s not forget, my refusal to accept her crazily erratic, deceitful, and wicked behavior, that was “torture” too. I could go on for an hour about all the damn times her friends had a go at me, but you get the point. Her close friend still continues to contact me occasionally still pulling for Sara, trying to rile me up, break me down, the whole damn game. For those of you out there reading this, yes I’ve blocked them all off from every avenue and yes, I ignore them 100%, regardless they persist still. They won’t let go, it’s unbelievable.

--Threatening suicide. Sara countless times threatened to kill herself to me, because of me/my actions. This was so common occurrence it became like Peter and the Wolf, she’d cry suicide, and I would take it with grain of salt (this probably happened several times before with other people in her life as per one of her friend’s testimony). A few times she said she “attempted suicide” because of me and told all her friends that too. However, these were total lies as well. One time she said took ten sleeping pills. Just ten. That’s not enough to kill anyone and Sara allegedly had several pill suicide attempts under her belt. She told me that and she told me she knew the right combination of pills for suicide. My point is she knew ten sleeping pills wouldn’t do it and did this gesture just to make me feel responsible and cave to her demands. Sara was also not very bright at all. I bring this up because she told me she “attempted suicide” by smoking 6 cigarettes a day for two months. I thought she was joking, she wasn’t she assured me. That remains on my list of the dumbest things I’ve ever heard.

--Falsifying self-harm. Sara also told me dozens of times that she was cutting her wrists, taking pills, and bleeding out when I was talking to her in an effort to guilt me, shame me, and make me feel responsible for HER actions. Again, this was another thing Sara did when I “upset” her (meaning I did something she didn’t like such as say, “wow that actress in that movie is really attractive or talk to a girl on Facebook). None of her claims of self-harm were ever true, she never cut her wrists, she never mutilated herself, she never did a damn thing! I know because her friends never mentioned it, when I saw her on video chat she never had any scars on her, she never went to the hospital, and there simply is no evidence other than her distorted, unhinged words to show that she ever harmed herself “because of me.” That was one thing I really feared from all her lying about self-harm and suicide attempts, that if she ever did do something, it would be blamed on me. She had the supporting testimony of her friends that I was an evil man and all the writing on her computer would tell a similar story. A big, mean old American boy made her cut herself. That got me real worried a few times and 1 or times it even worked on me, I caved. However, thankfully, everything she ever said was completely false

--Fabricating stories. Sara completely fabricated a story that she and her friend were coming to my state in the US the very next week once, just to get me to talk to her again. I fell for it. I had stopping talking to her for almost a week at the time, I told her I wouldn’t talk to her again until she shaped up, sought mental help, did better in school, looked for a job, etc. She did none of those and made up this story. Oh and me telling her to shape up in life or I wouldn’t talk to her was “punishment” apparently. This is just one of many stories she completely made up, some others include, she and her friend starting a record company, her running away from home, her marrying of a Prussian Prince (yes, really, read that again), she and her mother having psychic powers (yes, really again), and her getting a job as a backing singer for a pop star (yes, really, yet again). It’s not an exaggeration to say that most of everything she said to me ever, was a falsity.

--Faking suicide. Yep, she even went as far to fake her own death just to make me feel bad. Think about that for a minute, who is somebody you’d fake your own death to, to shame? During yet another one of our innumerable arguments in the beginning of 2011, she told me she was going to “kill herself”….again. She wrote me a long email saying how bad her whole life was and how I was a terrible person, blah, blah, blah (she’d done this many times before, some even had subject lines like “farewell”). She told all her friends she was killing herself too AND she told them to all tell me that. Her one friend contacted me and in an angry, yet nonchalant and completely unbelievable tone said, “You know Sara just killed herself right?” Funnily enough her message arrived before Sara’s message saying she was “killing herself.” Guess she was psychic. Conclusion, it was a massive hoax. Sara didn’t even harm a hair on her head and contacted me a few days later when she realized her ruse failed. Well, I don’t know about you, but Sara’s actions (faking attempting suicide and crying wolf), really degrade and demean people who are actually in crisis. Many people don’t take people in crisis seriously because of attention seeking and manipulative people like Sara. Keep that in mind as you read this, her stupid, reckless, cruel intentioned actions have larger consequences.

--Disrespecting the dead. In March, a true women, a girl who DID actually love and care for me was tragically killed by a drunk driver. I was internally very upset about it. Sara offered no sympathy and called this girl I so adored a “freak” because she committed the cardinal sin in Sara’s book of liking me (remember Sara thought I was her boyfriend). She called my dead friend a freak and essentially said good riddance. I was stunned you don’t disrespect the dead like this ever in my book. I flipped out on her, I lost it, I couldn’t believe someone could be so low, this poor girl had been killed by a drunk driver at just 19 and Sara was glad she was dead for no other reason than this girl treated me well. Sara is, was, and always was/will be, an unbelievably controlling person. No one and no-thing could ever step out of the narrowly defined bounds she put on the universe. She was just that domineering.

--Persistent to the point of insanity. Even after I wrote her that final tell off on April 6th, Sara and her close friend continued to contact me occasionally still trying to guilt me, shame me, and make me feel bad in every way possible. They keep on doing this, even though I have ignored them for months now. They keep on doing this, in a combined effort, to get at me. Sara’s friend messaged me once, “I know you don’t care, but Sara is missing.” A totally false claim, apparently not logging into Facebook counts as “being missing in action.” Another time Sara messaged me saying, “I’ve found someone who doesn’t lie or cheat or treat me like an object, he treats me like a lady.” Good, that guy is a mangina if he exists and I don’t do any of the aforementioned things anyway, so go fuck yourself. Finally, recently, and most ridiculously, Sara’s friend messaged me saying, “Sara is getting married.” I was bored to the point of tears at my job, so I asked, “Who is the “lucky” guy?” Sara’s friend told me she is getting married to the Prince of Prussia. Yes, really, read that statement again if it doesn’t sink in the first time. The Prince of fucking Prussia. Despite the fact that it makes no sense at all for a billionaire prince to marry a random, completely psychotic girl in England, Sara’s friend and later Sara when she messaged me yet again, said the Prince of Prussia was marrying her. I hope this incident, if none others have convinced you dear reader, just how totally, completely, unabashedly insane and malicious Sara is and by extension her friends, who saw me as the evil enemy and played along with Sara 100% against evil, old me. (As of 5/27/11, Sara and her close friend STILL contact me occasionally with harassing messages).

--She didn’t want to get better. Many of you out there right now may be feeling a lot of sympathy for Sara. What a poor severely mentally ill girl with dead beat parents (both drug heads and assholes) and a traumatic childhood (ex: divorce of her parents). However, before you go feeling any sympathy for Sara, take into account that she didn’t want to get better. She didn’t want to improve, she didn’t want to change, and she didn’t want to get help. At all, ever.

Despite my telling her to go to a psychologist and her telling me mental health services were free in the UK, she never went. In fact, she refused to go. She refused to take any steps beyond “talking with me” to improve her mental well-being. By her own admission she said she was “really fucked up,” but flat-out refused to do anything about it. She thought none of it would work. How can you help someone who doesn’t want to be helped? Someone who is completely remorseless, living in her own distorted world, and operating on a system of “right and wrong” far different from any rational construct?

She’d also complain that her school grades were poor, yet never got extra help with it or stayed after class (despite my repeated urging), and she consistently, deliberately, completely blew off doing her homework. She made pithy efforts at school and then acted surprised when she failed everything. It was ludicrous, when you don’t pay attention, don’t do the work, and don’t seek any tutoring, who is to blame, but you?

“I can’t get a job,” Sara cried to me over and over again. She told me it was because of her poor school grades (which were due to her pathetic efforts). I didn’t buy that though; people with poor grades can get jobs. Did that mean everyone in the UK had good grades? I don’t know much about the English labor or educational system, but that seemed off to me. Either way, she barely made any effort to search for employment and then it appears she gave up. She gave up and remained unemployed for months, all while telling me of her alleged grand plans like starting a company with her dead beat friend and taking a trip to Rome. In another bit of lazy ridiculousness, she told that in the future her husband would do all the working for her while she just stayed home and “did stuff.” What “lucky” a guy! Her employment situation was, much like her school grades, very much her own doing.

I hope you can see how hard it is it to have any sympathy for someone who is totally remorseless and doesn’t want to get better in any way and won’t even make the most token efforts at improvement. As of the last time she sent me a harassing message on 5/27/11, she apparently still hasn’t improved in attitude and is still set on harmful efforts aimed at me. It is in my opinion, as it has been since the month I met Sara, that she should be involuntarily committed to a mental hospital, force-fed medication (because she’d never take it voluntarily), and kept locked up for a long, long time. That is the only way to change behavior in severe cases. Sara represents the worst kind of offender, one who is remorseless, won’t change, refuses to self-improve, and lives in a world created by her disturbed mind. I wonder what it will take or how long it will take for her to change, or give up on her grudge against me….if ever.

What Will Women Do When the World Collapses?

2011-05-29T23:12:00.000+01:00

Holidays make me happy! :)

Anyway...

There are a growing number of people that are predicting a major financial collapse in the west within our lifetimes. These aren't crackpots or doomsdayers or scaremongers (although these labels could be applied to some people making these predictions) but intelligent people making a very considered observation about our current fiat monetary system. I won't get in to the financial or mathematical side of things as to why I believe that these are true, there are plenty of other people who can do that better than I ever could. But consider this, what would YOU do, as a man, if that eventuality did actually transpire?

If you are anything at all like me then you would gather your family together, gather your resources and defend them with your life.

Quick thought... How many single mothers are there that live on benefits or handouts from the government or their ex-partner? How many women have bent over and shagged their ex-partners in the courts via false rape, custody, alimony etc? How on Earth would these women manage to survive if these handouts suddenly stopped?

The short answer is, they wouldn't. There is no way these 'independent' (read: totally dependent) women would have any chance of survival alone. The first man that walked past would be totally free to take whatever he wanted.

So what would they do? The way I see it they would have very few options. They could either seek the father of their children and hope that he still has the motivation to support her after all she put him through in the family court system (good luck with that one). They could quite possibly form some small groups of mothers that try to help each other and share their resources with one another. Of course this would be easier if they had any resources or the means to defend them. What about a feminist militia? How long would they last?

The truth is that they would hide behind the strongest man willing to help them... every single one of them.

A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle? Yeah right, only until the shit hits the fan!

Masculism vs Feminism

2011-05-11T16:51:00.000+01:00

I saw this article on antimisandry.com and it made me realise something quite important about the distinctions being made, and what I think we need to do.

Here is an excerpt from the original article by Pelle Billing:

Feminism is a well established movement that’s been around for more than 200 years; perhaps the starting point can be said to be when Mary Wollstonecraft wrote A Vindication of the Rights of Woman in 1792. Masculism (a k a men’s rights activism), on the other hand, has been around for a few decades at best, while only gaining some traction in the 2000s. Apart from the fact that feminism is a movement which is much older and stronger than masculism, is it possible to compare these two movements, and can men’s rights activists (MRAs), learn something from feminism’s strategies and theories?

First of all, what does feminism contain, what are its different components? The way I see it, the major components are:

A desire to work with women’s issues
A political conviction that women as a group are oppressed by men as a group, and therefore need to be liberated
Performing the same kind of overview of masculism, yields these results:
A desire to work with men’s issues
A political conviction that feminism does not fit with the facts, and needlessly vilifies men
The key difference here is that feminism paints men as a group as a problem in society, while MRAs paint feminism as a theory (and its vocal proponents) as a problem in society. As I see it, it is crucial for any and all masculists around the world to keep differentiating between feminism and women, since it is only as long as masculism takes a step into the future and learns from the past mistakes of feminism that it can reasonably be said to take the moral high ground in the discussion on gender issues.

Now, my main problem with this article is that it seems to pit MRAs and feminists as the opposite ends of the spectrum. Quite ironically because the article's intention is quite the opposite. Is a masculist the same thing as an MRA? I would argue that it isn't, nor should it be.

If we are to have balance I think the picture should look more like this:

Feminism = female supremacist group that believes women are superior to men and should be in control of society.

Masculism = male supremacist group that believes men are superior to women and should be in control of society.

See how the two are both extremes of the spectrum? The difference is that feminism has, like Mr Billing says, been around for over 200 years and masculism barely exists at all. MRAs do not believe such things. They simply, as MR Billing also says, oppose feminism. This doesn't, however, make them the opposite of feminism. There are many people that oppose feminism, that doesn't make them masculists.

I often read rubbish that tries to characterise MRAs as extremists that are akin to radical feminists. This simply isn't true and is very detrimental to the MRM. Most MRAs aren't male supremacists and simply call for 'equality', without the underlying ideology that men are better or deserve more. Society, and moreover this insane politically correct environment we live in, has this habit of trying to find the middle ground to make things as fair as possible. Like this:

Do you not think this is true? Feminism has been allowed to go so far because of this exact reason, and it's lack of meaningful opposition. See, defining MRAs as the antithesis of feminists shifts this middle ground closer to the feminists. Like this:

What desperately needs to happen is for there to be a real masculist movement. I've written before about ifeminists, and I think they are far closer to MRAs and where the line should be that many people may assume. I think if we did have a real masculist polarity then the picture would look a lot more like this:

See what I'm getting at? MRAs are not masculists, because they don't believe men are superior, like ifeminists are not feminists because they believe in equal rights for men. This is just about the fairest way of resolving the whole gender issue, IMO.

So, what exactly is masculism, if not MRAs? I would say look up The Manhood Academy.

Feminism is Obsolete

2011-05-11T14:32:00.000+01:00

Why does feminism even exist anymore? Honestly think about that for a second.

Read any feminist literature and what they complain about boils down to pretty much 3 things:

1. Men earn more

2. Men commit domestic violence and rape

3. Women are under represented at the top level of society because of 'discrimination' or 'oppression'

All of these things are easily, and have been repeatedly rebuked. Watch how easy it is!

1. Read 'Why Men Earn More' by Warren Farrell. Or watch the youtube video.

2. Read most domestic violence is reciprocal, and the home office stats about rape. Then watch Paul Elam's film 'Domestic Violence: women are half the problem'.

3. Watch manwomanmyth's film about 'the glass ceiling' or read this article on The Spearhead

That's right, now they only exist to attack men. That's it!

Anti-Male Shaming Tactics in the Media

2011-05-11T14:05:00.000+01:00

If you haven't read the catalogue of male shaming tactics then I suggest you run your evil ass over there sharpish. It certainly helps when dealing with feminists or manginas. If you have any doubts that these tactics are actually employed, large scale, then I'm going to quickly prove it to you now!

Here is one example on fox news of the charges of irascibility and instability. The interview is with top lawyer Roy Den Hollander about feminism at his old university.

Notice Neil Cavuto saying "You have issues don't you" and "Roy, you're angry. You're very angry". As if sticking up for men means any of those things. Cavuto you are an emasculated, pussy whipped mangina. And you know it!

This feminist reactionary article about Tory MP Dominic Raab's critique of feminism also uses two charges to shame Mr Raab. The charges of puerility and hypersensitivity. Notice the name of the article doesn't even try to hide the shaming egenda, 'English Tory MP Throws his toys out of the pram', then goes on to describe his excellent article about feminist bigotry as 'a bit of a strop'. Labour MP Nia Griffith then went on record to tell Mr Raab 'to get real and stop being so self-pitying'! Classic example of the charges of fanaticism and hypersensitivity.

Notice how these charges often come in multiples.

Read this article in reaction to Tory councillor James Williams' critique of sexist 'go' orders. The charming writer swiftly utilizes the charge of misogyny. Calling him and manwomanmyth 'misogynists' and also stating that he 'has a bug up his arse'.

Beware that if you take issue with feminists or their rants, these tactics WILL be used against you. Memorise the catalogue and be prepared, this MRA business can be tough and you will face opposition. Fortunately the people who oppose you are very easily disposed of if you don't accept this nonsense, which they all employ. If you be vigilant they will expose themselves as hysterical bigots... you don't even need to try!

All Men are Abused

2011-05-09T21:03:00.000+01:00

This is a film remake (gotta love xtranormal) of my post 99% of men are the victims of abuse... are you?.
I've changed the title to reflect the fact that I've yet to meet a man who can answer no to every question.

Remember ladies, when you have 'equality' you won't be able to do any of these things any more than men can!

See you in jail bitch! LOLOLOL!

Equality!

2011-05-09T16:23:00.000+01:00

Feminist idiots (under this banner include anyone who actually uses the word ‘equality’ while not taking the mickey mouse or attacking feminism) screaming ‘eeekwoleeteeeeeeeeeeeeee!’ is a very common background noise to life nowadays. Annoying as it is, it seems to have captivated most women, and a very large number of manginas (the people formally known as men). What is so intoxicating about this word? You do realise that it is a semantic fallacy, don’t you?

NOBODY WANTS ‘EQUALITY’!

That’s right, nobody. I really can’t even bring myself to write it without inverted commas without feeling like I’m conning an old man out of the last fiver of his war pension. If you think they do then you are ignorant, blind, stupid and quite possibly another form of lower class mammal that somehow resembles a human and you’ve managed to fluke your way out of being sussed. Think monkeys throwing turds at people… ‘equality’ turds. He threw more turds than me… I must be oppressed!

WTF is ‘equality’ anyway?

Is it…

We all love each other and respect each other and accept the masculine and feminine energies inside us to work together. Everyone is happy and men are all sorry for the thousands of years of oppression of women.

????

If you think this is ‘equality’, go and give the conscious men a rimjob you idealistic fool. You have been sold the feminist lie, and you paid for it too! Like an Eskimo buying ice, you should feel duped. Seriously, if you are on this blog and actually still think this after reading anything here then there is something wrong with you that *hopefully* medicine has a cure for. Don’t get all defensive either, I drank from the feminist kool-aid bottle before too, and there is no shame in being tricked… just educate yourself and don’t let it happen again!

‘EQUALITY’ MEANS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

Why anybody actually wastes any more of their time even thinking about a concept that is :

fraudulent
impossible to achieve
stupid
irrational and illogical
completely detached from reality
a sociological disaster
destroying families and lives
making everyone miserable
causing crime
killing people

is completely and utterly beyond me.

People talk about ‘equality of opportunity’ vs ‘equality of outcomes’, this is also nonsense. Men and women are not, have never been and will never be equal! Barring some seriously advanced technology, a woman will never have a penis (I love mine by the way, even if it makes me evil!) that works and a man will never give birth. What feminists actually mean when they are talking about ‘equality’ is more akin to what I would term ‘penis envy’. They see men in bars being confident or at the game being rowdy and want a piece of the action. They see men in boardrooms making tough decisions and kicking ass on the battlefield and THEY ARE JEALOUS. I dare say that they’ve never had a good hard shag either, yet they know the man ALWAYS COMES. Men have achieved almost everything that has been achieved over the entire course of history. EVEN THE FEMINIST MOVEMENT WAS DOWN TO MEN! (not sure whether to laugh or cry about that one)

Stop being so pissy about it and just accept who and what you are, LIKE EVERY MAN IN THE WORLD HAS TO. There are many weak, short, poor, ugly, stupid and otherwise ‘inferior’ men out there. There always has been, yet you don’t hear them crying foul and ‘oppression’ or ‘patriarchy’ (unless they are a mangina). As men, you may have neglected to notice, NOBODY DOES ANYTHING FOR YOU AND YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR OWN ACTIONS AND WELLBEING.

No feminist wants that for women, and any man that says he wants that for a woman he cares about is a liar.

BallWalk: We've Had Enough!

2011-05-05T12:02:00.000+01:00

A representative of the Gotham City Police gave shocking insight into the Force’s view of sexual assault by stating: “Men should avoid walking around with their balls hanging out so they don’t get victimized”
As the city’s major protective service, the Gotham City Police have perpetuated the myth and stereotype of ‘the ball exposer’, and in doing so have failed us. With sexual assault already a significantly under-reported crime, survivors have now been given even less of a reason to go to the Police, for fear that they could be blamed. Being assaulted isn’t about what you wear; it’s not even about sex; but using a pejorative term to rationalize inexcusable behaviour creates an environment in which it’s okay to blame the victim.
Historically, the term ‘ball exposer’ has carried a predominantly negative connotation. Aimed at those who are sexually promiscuous, be it for work or pleasure, it has primarily been men who have suffered under the burden of this label. And whether dished out as a serious indictment of one’s character or merely as a flippant insult, the intent behind the word is always to wound, so we’re taking it back. “baller” is being re-appropriated.

Gotham City Policeman

We are tired of being oppressed by ball-shaming; of being judged by our sexuality and feeling unsafe as a result. Being in charge of our sexual lives should not mean that we are opening ourselves to an expectation of violence, regardless if we participate in sex for pleasure or work. No one should equate enjoying sex with attracting sexual assault.
We are a movement demanding that our voices be heard. We are here to call foul on our Police Force and demand change. We want Gotham City Police Services to take serious steps to regain our trust. We want to feel that we will be respected and protected should we ever need them, but more importantly be certain that those charged with our safety have a true understanding of what it is to be a survivor of sexual assault — balls or otherwise.
We are tired of speeches filled with lip service and the non-apologies that accompany them. What we want is meaningful dialogue and we are doing something about it: WE ARE COMING TOGETHER. Not only as men, but as people from all gender expressions and orientations, all walks of life, levels of employment and education, all races, ages, abilities, and backgrounds, from all points of this city and elsewhere.
We are asking you to join us for BallWalk, to make a unified statement about sexual assault and victims’ rights and to demand respect for all. Whether a fellow ball wearer or simply an ally, you don’t have to wear your sexual proclivities on your sleeve, we just ask that you come. Any gender-identification, any age. Singles, couples, parents, sisters, brothers, children, friends. Come walk or roll or strut or holler or stomp with us. This has become a global movement, with Satellites happening all over the world.
Join us in our mission to spread the word that those who experience sexual assault are not the ones at fault, without exception.

Bollocks to discrimination!

What do you mean this is stupid?

http://www.slutwalktoronto.com/

Women Hate White Knight Manginas, Bruno!

2011-05-03T02:22:00.000+01:00

I'm sure you have heard that irritatingly puke-worthy song by Bruno Mars, 'Grenade'. Here is a small selection of the lyrics, just in case you haven't:

I’d catch a grenade for ya (yeah, yeah)
Throw my hand on a blade for ya (yeah, yeah)
I’d jump in front of a train for ya (yeah, yeah)
You know I’d do anything for ya (yeah, yeah)
Oh, oh, I would go through all of this pain,
Take a bullet straight through my brain!
Yes, I would die for ya, baby,
But you won’t do the same.

And if the last line of that chorus doesn't explain to you how this behaviour would make women respond, or if you think 'it's romantic' or still have a delusion that women like this type of white knighting...

Watch this parody!

&lt;p&gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;N&amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;

The girl has a really good voice doesn't she? I hope it isn't her in the picture!

Needless to say, I think this video summarises quite nicely how she feels about Mr Mars and his excruciatingly needy and self defeating chivalry.

Take heed to the last line, any white knight wannabes!

I'm concerned for you baby, you just might be insane!!

It's Evil Time!

2011-05-03T01:28:00.000+01:00

If you follow this blog you may have noticed that a lot of the recent posts have been somewhat limited, basic or cursory in nature. You may have also noticed that I've added an introduction section. The recent posts are meant to be part of that and their simplicity is no accident, nor is it because of a lack of invention or inspiration. I wanted to have somewhere that a person who isn't up on the MRA/anti-feminist cause could learn about these issues as quickly as possible and get a general feel for the ideas that the men's movement promotes.

My original intention with this blog was first to inform and to challenge people's perception of the status quo, then to gather support and generate more interest in these things. Many MRA blogs and sites seem to be quite complex or fragmented and I know that when I first started reading them it took me a while to actually get the whole message. I wanted to express these ideas is as succinct a way as I possibly could, so I hope the introduction section and the links provided therein achieve that. I also wanted to make it relatively palatable for a newbie so I have shown a significant amount of restraint in both my language and the tone of the posts.

I think I'm just about done with that side of things now, so what you'll be getting from me as of now is more like what I think the name of this blog suggests. From now on this blog is an all out assault on feminism, political correctness, manginas, misandry and any other crap that negatively affects men. Really, a no holds barred assault in whichever tone takes my fancy at the time of writing; be it humorous, angry, sad or otherwise - although it certainly won't be apologetic or insipid... hopefully anyway.

The focus will be current affairs and things I find in the media rather than writing philosophical namby-pamby articles that are aimed at MRAs, why preach to the converted? Not that I don't want other MRAs to read this blog, of course I do, you are all my friends and hopefully you can take something from the content here. In fact, anyone that opposes feminism is a friend in my eyes and I wish said intelligent person all the luck in the world in fighting our common enemy.

Ciao for now!

Misandry

2011-05-02T16:07:00.000+01:00

What is Misandry? Most people don’t even know what the word means. In fact, spellcheckers don’t even recognise it as a word, check! It would seem obvious that it is the equivalent of misogyny, except if you look at the dictionary definitions of the two words then you will see a distinct difference:

Misogyny

A hatred, dislike or mistrust of women.

Misandry

Hatred of males.

Why is it different? Mistrust of women is misogyny, but mistrust of men isn’t misandry, apparently. Well do you know what I say to this? BS!

I’ve decided to adopt the definition of misogyny and simply graft it onto misandry. Therefore, from hereon after, the definition of misandry is ‘a hatred, dislike or mistrust of men’.

Feminists would have us believe that our society is completely saturated with misogyny. This is complete nonsense. The vast majority of men I know seem to worship women as if they were some kind of divine species sent from heaven to enrich their lives. The reality is that they say this to shame men into doing as they are told, and accepting the female supremacist agenda that they are built upon.

Misandry, however, is so prevalent that it almost seems normal. We literally see it everywhere. If anyone dare speak out about it they are again shamed and called wimps or whiners. If you think this isn’t true, then here come some examples, starting with some of the most obvious and downright disgusting.

Have you heard of ‘The SCUM Manifesto’? Valerie Solanas suggests we cut the population of men down to 10% of its current number! Here are just a couple of quotes:

He [the male] is trapped in a twilight zone halfway between humans and apes, and is far worse off than the apes because, unlike the apes, he is capable of a large array of negative feelings - hate, jealousy, contempt, disgust, guilt, shame, doubt - and moreover he is aware of what he is and isn't.

The male is a biological accident: the Y (male) gene is an incomplete X (female) gene, that is, has an incomplete set of chromosomes. In other words, the male is an incomplete female, a walking abortion, aborted at the gene stage. To be male is to be deficient, emotionally limited; maleness is a deficiency disease and males are emotional cripples.

This piece is obviously written by a crackpot, although it is very well known. This is just the very start of our journey into misandry. Learn about Mary Kellett, the prosecutor in Maine and about how the police and legal professionals are indoctrinated by misandrists (feminists).

This article would become far too long if I included all of the examples I found of misandry that a simple google search uncovers. To make things more palatable, watch the following video which is the first in a series on misandry, then if you are interested watch all of his other films, you might just be enlightened. Here is the introduction...

Got Game?

2011-04-28T13:11:00.000+01:00

It seems as though everyone is discussing ‘Game’, or ‘pickup’ or ‘Venusian arts’ or whatever you want to call it. Everybody in the manosphere has a conflicting view about it. Some say that it is the way for men to emancipate themselves from sexual subjugation. Others say that it is simply a feminist construct to attack men. Either love it or hate it, you simply cannot ignore it. I am mixed. There are some aspects of it that I truly think are rotten to the core. However there definitely are aspects of Game that I think are very much beneficial to both men in general and to any individual man’s quality of life. What I personally can’t escape from is the fact that I am naturally a very outgoing and sociable person. I also really enjoy the company of women, and even if I didn’t it is quite hard to ignore them, so which is the best way forward?

The first time I came across it was when the book ‘The Game’ by Neil ‘I’m the worst mangina sellout in the world’ Strauss came out. I was certainly intrigued, to put it mildly. Before then I thought that meeting and seducing women was something that men just had to figure out on their own. The only advice I’d had before that was from my parents saying ‘be confident’ and ‘be yourself’. All of a sudden there were hundreds if not thousands of men running around dressed like Mystery doing magic tricks and going out ‘sarging’. Internet forums popped up about it all over the place and it became really big, really quickly. Why wouldn’t it? What guy doesn’t want to sleep with beautiful women? That was what Game promised and it really captivated lots of people.

That was a while ago now and the whole scene has changed quite a lot since then, I think in a positive way overall. The general theme of Game has changed from being about tricks and methods of getting women into bed to being about self-improvement. This is, I think, a good thing. Now far more ‘gurus’ are talking about being ‘natural’ and designing programs to help men transform themselves into attractive men. Focusing on oneself as opposed to women is the best way to look at these matters, in my opinion. If you are focusing on them then surely you are merely supplicating? More on that later…

I was one of the people that got into it from the get-go. Not in a massive way, but I was certainly interested in it and read about it quite a lot. I had some success from it too. For example, between splitting up with my ex and getting with my ex-wife (a period of about 8 months) I slept with over 30 different women. I slept with 3 girls in one day (one of which was a virgin). I kissed/got off with/made out with 10 girls in a night. I invited 6 girls on a ‘date’ with me in the same bar at the same time (and didn’t get slapped lol) just for a laugh and to see what would happen. I then got married to a real life 10 (think a mix between Megan Fox, Eva Mendes and Queen Cleopatra), and although that turned out to be the biggest mistake of my entire life it doesn’t change the fact that she was a very beautiful girl that I really don’t think I would’ve had a chance with before I learnt about Game. This leaves me in what I think is quite a unique position when it comes to Game. I don’t recall reading any articles about the dangers of women and sex when trying to tell people how to get it (please comment if you know of any that do, I would be very interested in reading them).

I want to talk next about what I believe are the positive and negative aspects of Game, and how I think we should implement it as men. Again, because this stuff is so popular I believe we can't ignore it, the only thing we can really do is accept it and use it wisely. There may be many dissenting views about this, and like I always say, please leave a comment f you feel anything I say isn’t true or if you disagree. I want to help improve the lives of men both in their personal lives and politically, so if you think you can show me that I’m wrong then I’ll reconsider my position.

The Bad Side.

Some of the ‘tactics’ I have read about strike me as being extremely dangerous, never mind utterly stupid and humiliating. I personally would never go around for days on end approaching random women in the street. Do you want to get arrested for sexual harassment? A friend of mine was telling me about a time when, upon instruction of some ‘guru’, he approached literally hundreds of girls over the course of a week in London. Each time he used the same direct opener: ‘I saw you and thought you were really cute, I just had to come over and say hi’. Now he did this, he told me, over 200 times before he got a positive response (one time the woman shouted at him ‘not you again!’ and ran off! LOL!). Now I don’t know about you but I really don’t fancy walking up to hundreds if not thousands of random women and getting rejected over and over and over. Add to that the very real risk of getting arrested for harassment and this method is a definite no-go for me, and I would advise all other men the same.

Have you ever read about something called ‘LMR’ or ‘Last Minute Resistance’? This is a situation where you have got the girl all the way back to your room and she suddenly says ‘No’. I’ve read a few articles on how to ‘blast through’ it! Honestly, I cannot stress how much I think this concept is severely retarded. I obviously am in a unique position but, for crying out loud, DO YOU WANT TO END UP IN PRISON ON A RAPE CHARGE OR WHAT?

Another thing I don’t appreciate about (some people’s version of) Game is the idea that you have to do the chasing and that it is encouraged to approach 1,000 girls before you ‘get your technique down’. So what have you just done to the (already inflated and super entitled) egos of these thousand women? It is also fuel for the enemy. If this kind of behaviour continues the feminazis will make it illegal for a man to speak to a woman in the street. In fact, they are already trying

Another thing that makes Game dangerous is the fact that if you do manage to get good (and this is not an easy feat for most men) you are likely to be sleeping with lots of women. Some of them will naturally get pissed off at you for ‘cheating’ and/or lying. Many false rape claims result from a woman being scorn, you know the saying – Hell hath no fury!

Most of the materials you come across are produced by charlatans with no real credentials or experience and are just looking to make a quick buck. A lot of the things you read are completely contradictory, and furthermore some of the things that are written are just completely unnecessary or flat out wrong. This can make learning a frustrating and confusing experience.

The Good Side

Feminazis mostly hate it! This fact is worth a paragraph on its own.

It is quite ironic that with this preference now of ‘natural’ Game, you can pretty much summarise the entire message you will get from spending hundreds of pounds on some product that promises to be ‘the next level’ or something similar in two short sentences….

Be yourself.

Be confident.

That’s exactly what my parents said!

That said this is an oversimplification of what you can learn, and actually being yourself and being confident aren’t easy things to achieve (I can’t help you with that, but some of the products out there can and are specifically tailored to). However it is this notion of ‘being yourself’ that I think is the most helpful for men. It is true that if you behave like this, women will naturally feel a certain way towards you. That is also true of men. How is being totally calm and centered going to have any negative impact on your life at all?

This ‘natural’ concept can really do you a lot of favours in your social life. That is, if you have or indeed want one (there’s nothing wrong with you if you don’t!). The way I implement this in my life isn’t to ‘pick up chicks’, nor do I have any real interest in pursuing women for sex. It does, on the other hand, make your life a lot easier if you can make women feel attracted to you. I can honestly say that I think most of the women I know have or do feel some level of attraction for me on some level and at some point. Not that I’m saying ‘all women love me’ or something else ridiculous like that, I’d be a rich man if they did. Conveying your value as a person (to men and women) is a positive thing, and also something I would advise anyone to do. You don’t have to have sex with anybody if you don’t want to!

In this sense I would equate Game with women wearing make-up or sexy clothes. I would certainly say that being confident in a way that you know makes people attracted to you is something that can make your life both easier and more enjoyable. I would prefer to improve myself that way than try to do it in superficial ways like nice clothes or plastic surgery. Game also encourages, nay demands, that you become a leader, particularly with women so it therefore means that you aren’t pandering to them or putting them on a pedestal. Just remember that it is about YOU. Be safe and have fun, we’re only here once so try to get the most out of life, nobody could criticise you for that.

What about Game and the Men's Movement? There are many people that think gamers are poison and are dragging the men's movement backwards. This is, I think, true in many ways. The thing is, as far as I'm concerned, you cannot escape the popularity of this stuff. There are many gamers in the community, and I don't envisage them leaving. What I suggest is for these men to follow my example. Do not 'try' to have sex with anyone. Honestly I can't remember the last time I 'tried it on' with anyone. I think a good way to progress the Men's Movement would be to tap into this platform, to educate gamers about real issues men face and the dangers they face when dealing with women. Let's face facts, there are thousands upon thousands of men who have read about Game but have no idea about the Men's Movement, why not target these men? I'm sure that like this we can get a lot more attention. More voices = more power to change things.

Beyonce Sings The New Female Supremacist Anthem!

2011-04-22T19:14:00.000+01:00

Have you heard the new song from Beyonce?

Here is the 'song', if you can stand listening to the whole thing...

Apart from the whole track being truly awful, for those of you who might say 'What is wrong with that?' here are the lyrics...

"Girls, we run this mutha ****** (yeah) x4
Who run the world? Girls! x4
(Repeat)

Some of them men think they freak this like we do but they don't
Make your cheques come at they neck, disrespect us no they won't
Boy don't even try to take us boy this beat is crazy
This is how they made me used to take us baby
This goes out to all my girls
That's in the club rocking the latest
Who will buy it for themselves and get more money later
I think I need a barber
None of these **** can fade me
I'm so good with this
I remind you I'm so hood with this
Boy I'm just playing, come here baby
Hope you still like me, if you hate me
My persuasion can build a nation
In this hour, our love we can devour
You'll do anything for me

Who run the world? Girls! x4
Who run this mutha ****** girls! x4

It's hot up in here DJ don't be scared
To run this, run this back
I'm rapping for the girls who taking over the world
Have me raise a glass for the college grads
Anyone rolling I'll let you know what time it is
You can't hold me
I broke my 9 to 5 and copped my check
This goes out to all the women getting it on get on your grind
To the other men that respect what I do please accept my shine
Boy you know you love it how we're smart enough to make these millions
Strong enough to bare the children then get back to business
See you better not play me don't come here baby
Hope you still like me, if you hate me
My persuasion can build a nation
In this hour, our love we can devour
You'll do anything for me

Who run the world? Girls! x4
Who run this mutha ****** girls! x4
Who run the world? Girls! x4
We, we run, the world, we run this mutha ****** girls! x 4"

Now replace the words 'boys', 'men', 'women' and 'girls' with 'blacks' and 'whites' in any way you wish.

Is this hate speech or not?

I'm just waiting for Oprah and the feminist gang to declare this tosh... the best song ever!

Take Action

2011-04-21T22:07:00.000+01:00

So what can we do? Is it too late? Are all men doomed to a life of servitude and castigation at the whim of women?

My answer to this… God I hope not.

More optimistically, I highly doubt it. That is, if we all come together to fight. There is a possibility that some countries, including this one (and definitely Sweden), are too far gone but it is a big wide world and there are always other places you could go. Anywhere that operates under sharia law, for example, would be difficult to succumb to the feminist agenda of female supremacy.

But I don’t want to live in Saudi Arabia. I like my friends, my family and my life here. So what do we do?

I read a recent article by the futurist called ‘It’s Time to Expose Misandry’, and it gave me a lot of food for thought. Therein it provides if not a solution, then a catalyst for change (by the way, if you haven’t read his article ‘The Misandry Bubble’, I highly recommend it).

The article suggests that men embark on a campaign to raise awareness of these issues by distributing flyers at locations that have lots and lots of men. Places like public urinals in conference centres, universities, sports stadiums and military bases.

Imagine the impact it could have if practically every man in the country realised that he was in fact a second class citizen, his liberty existing only at the discretion of any woman he knows. Almost every man (and woman) I’ve spoken to about these issues agrees with me completely. The problem is that men are all too willing to accept difficulty and discrimination. ‘It is what it is, and we just have to get along in life’ is something that I often hear.

Well, we don’t have to accept anything. It is wrong and I, for one, will never accept this rubbish. I value myself as highly as any woman, and any fair thinking person would too.

If you cannot afford to print out flyers, or do not have the time or resources to do something on that scale, then I suggest the following (which I feel could have just as much of an impact).

Get a pen, preferably a permanent marker (although it isn’t necessary), and write the following in any public toilet you use, or any other public place you think men will use often:

‘Misandry?’

‘The Evil Penis’

‘Manwomanmyth’

or
the name of any other men's site such as the spearhead, a voice for men or false rape society
or
an 'ink flyer' of the type mentioned in the futurist article
or
all of the above.

If you aren’t familiar with Manwomanmyth, I would describe it as THE number one resource for men’s issues currently online, and I cannot iterate to you how much I think you should sit and watch his films. They are, and I’m sure you’ll agree, a comprehensive look at all of the issues I cover here, and so much more.

Make yourself visible also. Sign up to twitter and follow any and every men's site you can find. Follow them on facebook. Subscribe to the blogs. People can see how much traffic we are pulling, the more they see the more the impact. When you see articles in the main stream media, leave a comment. When you see examples of misandry in your life, point them out to people and make your feelings clear to them about it. Write letters of complaint to television networks when you see misandry on television. Call in to television and radio shows whenever you see a chance to spread the message. Think about starting your own group to discuss activism. Connect with other people online in forums. Write to your local MP to tell them about your concerns. Make legal challenges to discrimination.

We can win and we will win, because it is for the good of everyone. So go forth and spread our message!

Happy activism!

Debating Feminism

2011-04-21T17:44:00.000+01:00

This page is dedicated to listing links to places where I have debated feminism. My motivation for this was to show anyone who has any doubts about this material that it does actually stand up to debate. I am not some professional debater or anything, as you'll probably see, but it isn't hard to win arguments against feminists! This page will be updated every time I do this and a new link added.

Check them out, join in or just have fun at the expense of some of the people I debate (some of them are hilarious).

If you see one where you think I have lost, or where there have been more posts since the last time I went there, please tell me and I will go back to try and finish the job. Maybe if you think I am struggling you could even lend a supportive hand!

I don’t go to feminist sites, I really want to spread this message to people that may not be aware of the true colours of feminism, so the predominant sites will be those within the main stream media that allow comments. If you come across an article like this, and feel it would be a good opportunity to raise awareness, again let me know via a comment here and I'll get involved.

Sometimes there is a filter on the word 'penis' so I comment under other, similar names.

Enjoy!

http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/news/feminism-group-set-start-Gloucester/article-3454661-detail/article.html?

http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=Z9cfnqSFJn4
He blocked me!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/apr/30/suzanne-moore-david-cameron-feminism
This one I was too late, but I read most of the comments and the lads did me proud.

http://evilpenis.blogspot.com/2011/06/stfu-you-misogynist.html

Introduction

2011-04-21T17:21:00.000+01:00

If you have seen 'The Evil Penis' written somewhere, and wondered what it was about, then you are at the right place... It was me!

This blog is about men’s issues, of which there are many.The main stream media ignores them however, which is why I have had to 'go underground' to get this message to people.

If you are a man, or if you have a father, brother, son, nephew, uncle, husband, boyfriend, male cousin, grandfather or any male friends that you care about at all then you might be very interested in what I have to say.

If you disagree with any of the content here then I actively encourage you to leave a comment, if you prove me wrong about anything then I will change the thing you showed me was incorrect. I am not afraid of debate.

My experience of a false rape accusation taught me many things about how the system operates when it comes to men.

Feminism is, I believe, the main cause of many of the things that I discuss and is something that I am vehemently opposed to. Feminism and women are not the same thing, so if you think my critique of that particular ideology makes me a misogynist then please look up the word misogyny before you comment.

Unfortunately there are very few people willing to discuss these types of things in public, for many different reasons. I however, am one of these few. You can use all of the shaming language you want, I will not stop trying to educate people and trying to protect all men from the nasty fate that awaits them if they are ignorant to these facts.

There are plenty of men who need help, and I want to help them. That is all, and there aren’t that many people that do.

Ending misandry has become the main focus of my life, and I sincerely hope you come with me on this journey to make the world a better place.

A Message to Women

2011-04-19T15:25:00.000+01:00

I put up a link in my post about male suicide to an article on foxnews written by Wendy McElroy. I saw her site ifeminists.com and found their stance on gender issues completely refreshing. I know many women may feel as if they are traitors or defectors if they join the men's movement, but what other ways can you help women without hurting men?

This is the FAQ section from their introduction section.

What is ifeminism? Individualist feminism, or ifeminism, advocates the equal treatment of men and women as individuals under just law. The core principle of individualist feminism is that all human beings have a moral and legal claim to their own persons and property. It is sometimes called libertarian feminism. (back to top)
What is 'just' law? Just laws are those that protect the person and property of peaceful individuals -- for example, laws against rape. Unjust laws are those that infringe upon the freedom of peaceful individuals -- for example, laws against consensual adult sex acts. (back to top)
Why call yourself a 'feminist?' Why not just call yourself an individualist? Being a feminist is a form of specialization. In fighting for individual rights, some people focus upon injustice to women just as others focus upon injustice to gays or children. (back to top)
Sometimes the inequality works to women's advantage, as in affirmative action laws. Do you oppose them as well? Absolutely. Equality means neither privilege nor oppression. Besides which, it hardly benefits women to have a paternalistic state treat them as children or "lesser" human beings who need state assistance to become equal. (back to top)
Isn't government trying to help women? Governments have been the greatest violators of women's rights for centuries. In the 18th and 19th centuries in America, government denied to women the most basic rights of controlling their own bodies (e.g., birth control) and their own property (e.g., wives did not have an uncontested claim to their own wages). By the late 20th century, government cemented gender hostility into society by assuming a paternalistic role that advantaged women at the expense of men (e.g., affirmative action). Whether through privilege or oppression, governments seem unwilling to respect the full and equal individual rights of women. (back to top)
Opposing affirmative action and defending property rights is generally associated with conservatives. Isn't ifeminism just conservative feminism? Many conservatives are uncomfortable with the way ifeminism embraces radical civil liberties. For example, ifeminism calls for the decriminalization of prostitution and pornography. To an ifeminist, there is no schism between economic and civil liberties. They are both expressions of an individual's right to use her own body and property in any peaceful manner she chooses. (back to top)
Does this mean ifeminism supports abortion rights? This is a controversy within ifeminism. The majority of opinion is pro-choice on the grounds of a woman's self-ownership. A vocal minority within ifeminism, however, oppose abortion. They believe that the developing fetus can rightfully claim the same human rights as a newborn baby. (back to top)
This sounds like a new feminism. Where does it come from? ifeminism is enjoying a new revival, but its roots go back to the anti-slavery movement of the 19th century. In working for the equal rights of slaves, female abolitionists asked themselves "do we not have a claim to such rights ourselves?" When these women began to lecture and write on their own behalf, individualist feminism (as a movement in America) was born. Click here for more on the roots of ifeminism. (back to top)
What is the ifeminist position on date rape? First, let's distinguish between rape and consensual sex. When a person has sex with another person consensually and later regrets it, that does not constitute rape in an reasonable sense, and nobody should be punished for another person changing her or his mind about a choice she or he made.
That said, ifeminists repudiate the use of force by people of either gender to coerce sexual acts by people of either gender. Abhorrent as it is, however, it has become evident that the solution to such problems is not more government intervention. Governments have demonstrated their utter incompetence at dealing with rape cases. For example, Los Angeles County law enforcement officials lost or destroyed evidence in 1000+ rape and sex murder cases. ABC News reports that hundreds of thousands of rape kits- with the potential to put away criminals or exonerate wrongly accused persons- have sat for years on government shelves unanalyzed. (back to top)
Mainstream feminism tells us that girls are in constant danger of being sexually abused by their fathers, that women face the same from their husbands, etc. Ifeminism says to get the state out of personal issues. Wouldn't your individualist stance would leave all these victims without protection? First, we must recognize that the alarmism of mainstream feminism often blows problems way out of proportion and reports them out of context. It is true that some men abuse. However, the vast majority of men do not abuse, and most women are not at risk of abuse by the men in their family. Furthermore, studies also show that this is not a problem of male violence as portrayed by mainstream feminism. Rather, women perpetrate violence against their children and spouses at rates that are at least comparable to those of men. This is not to say that abuse is not a significant problem. It just isn't the problem that mainstream feminism portrays it to be.
It is also important to recognize that governments in their quest for power have an incentive to create- not solve- problems and to disempower- not empower- those who would solve them. For example, governments discourage access to firearms which have been shown to be an effective means of deterring and defending against violence. They offer instead the false protection of protective orders (a piece of paper) and police officers (who can't be everywhere at once). This leaves those who are targeted by abusers with less ability to protect themselves than they would have were individual rights respected instead. (back to top)
What is the ifeminist position on midwifery? Individuals are more likely than anyone else to do what is best for themselves and their families because individuals- not governments or other busybody special interest groups- have the most invested in a successful outcome. Midwifery is a tradition with a proven track record of quality care. Ifeminism supports the right of individuals to practice and to utilize the services of midwifery and opposes efforts by the American Medical Association or any other individual or organization to ban this competing service. Competition of a variety of birthing services in the free market offer individuals and their families the best chance to get superior care in form they are comfortable with and at an affordable price. (back to top)
What is the ifeminist position on gun ownership? Ifeminism supports the right of individuals to defend against violence. Firearms are a legitimate tool of self-defense. Firearms have been widely referred to as "the great equalizer" because they give individuals who would otherwise make attractive targets the ability to defend themselves against more powerful attackers. Many women (as well as men) have successfully used firearms to ward off attacks against themselves and others, sometimes without ever discharging the weapon. (back to top)
What about all the research supporting the contentions of mainstream feminism? Is it wrong? Biased? Much of the "research" cited in support of the claims of mainstream feminists is politically rather than factually based. The only way to really judge a scholarly work is to look at it critically. (back to top)
Why are so many ifeminists libertarians? What is the relationship? Individualist feminism and libertarianism are similar in that both philosophies uphold individual freedom and personal responsibility as core values. It is natural that libertarians interested in issues that affect women are drawn to ifeminism. (back to top)
What is the ifeminist position on domestic violence? Violence, except as used in a defensive capacity, is abhorrent, especially within the bounds of family or other intimate relationships. Ifeminists oppose the use of non-defensive violence by any person regardless of gender. We recognize that the conventional wisdom- that men are the perpetrators while women are the victims- is based on politics rather than on fact. Because governments are controlled by power-seeking special interest groups and because they impose blanket solutions on very diverse individualized problems lumped into a single category, ifeminism recognizes that governments offer little in the way of solutions to domestic violence. We support the private development of solutions that take into account and respect the rights of those individuals involved in or accused of being involved in domestic violence situations. (back to top)
There seem to be quite a few men involved in ifeminists.com. Aren't men and feminism contradictory? No. The original goal of the feminist movement was to achieve equal rights for women and men. By ignoring or supporting injustices to men, mainstream feminists have abandoned that goal. Ifeminism embraces men as partners in the struggle to eliminate injustice against women, and we support them and join them in the struggle to eliminate injustice against men as well. (back to top)
What is your position on the "men's movement"- fathers' rights and other movements generally thought to be masculine/masculist? Inasmuch as these movements promote equal rights for men and women, we stand together with them. However, we stand opposed to extremism in these movements (just as we oppose extremism in feminism) which detracts from that goal. (back to top)
Are equal rights and respect for both men and women good for women, or do women need more than that? Wouldn't it be better for women if they had total control over all aspects of society? People generally do not thrive when they have little or no control over their lives. This is as true of men as it is of women. Were men to be systematically controlled in such a manner, we would see a dramatic decline in the technical, artistic, social and other accomplishments and advances that men have contributed to human civilization since the birth of humanity. Moreover, women would lose any claim to moral decency as well as the respect of men. While it might satisfy a few power-hungry monsters, stifling the creativity and intellect of half the population would not be beneficial for the vast majority of women. (back to top)
What is the ifeminist position on having women's studies programs at public universities? Women's studies programs are a good example of why universities should not be publicly funded. Many people find that their tax dollars are funding poor scholarship and dissemination of offensive and inaccurate information in the name of women's studies. It is likely that such disinformation would have a hard time taking hold in a marketplace of ideas. Yet they are easily propped up when we are forced to support them against our will through taxes. The ifeminist position is that women's studies programs should compete in the free market. Let those who choose to fund them voluntarily do so, but it is inappropriate to force those who would otherwise not choose to fund them to "contribute" through taxation. (back to top)
Doesn't lack of identical representation in all fields imply that someone is attempting to prevent women's participation? Why aren't women found equally in all fields? Lack of identical representation of men and women in all fields may be caused by a number of factors, of which intentional exclusion is only one possibility. Unequal representation might instead indicate that fewer women than men are interested in a given field or that fewer women than men are economically competitive or qualified in a given field. By the same token, there are a number of fields in which men are in the minority. There aren't a lot of male quilters or midwives, for example. Again unequal representation in these fields does not necessarily indicate that someone is trying to prevent men's participation. Given the diversity of professions, hobbies, etc. to choose from, there simply isn't a blanket answer for why women and men do not always participate in equal numbers in all fields. (back to top)
Under what laws are women and men not treated equally? There are two ways women and men are not treated equally under the laws of today's governments. The first is fairly straightforward- some laws explicitly spell out that women and men will be treated differently. For example, the Women, Infants, and Children program- in spite of the claim of non-discrimination posted on its website- explicitly excludes adult males from eligibility (though their tax dollars are used to support the program). Many communities allow men to remove their shirts in public while it is an imprisonable offense for women to do so.
The second way is less straightforward- some laws which purport to treat men and women equally are, in fact, enforced disproportionately to the disadvantage of one gender or the other. For example, the increased "security" in airports following the 9/11 attacks in the United States has resulted in a barrage of complaints from women who have been fondled by the "security" guards who are reportedly targeting women for such abuse. In the area of child custody and support, women are much more likely to get custody of the children based on inaccurate assumptions about the nature of women/mothers and men/fathers. Men who are behind on child support payments are much more likely to be jailed than are women who are behind on their payments.
These are just a couple of brief examples of the gender inequities that are imposed upon us by governments. There are plenty of other examples, and there is still much work to be done to correct them. (back to top)
Isn't ifeminism really anti-feminism? Are you opposed to mainstream feminism? While ifeminism often stands in opposition to mainstream feminism, it is not a goal of ifeminism to oppose feminism. Where mainstream feminism stands in support of the original goals of the feminist movement, the two philosophies are in agreement. (back to top)

Is this not a million times better then feminism?

So my point is this... If you are a woman, or man interested in helping women, and you aren't a misandrist, there are alternatives to feminism. If you are interested in equality, even as an MRA - check out her site, and think about whether you are agree.